I know someone in the near past posted a thread about the prices that members were asking for their used SKS's but it baffles me the same how a VZ/CZ can be worth as much or more than a new rifle of the same model after they have blasted a case or less of corrosive (or non for that matter) ammo through it. Why would someone be interested in a rifle that has seen abuse and has a few scratches when you can spend the same money or 25 - 50 more and get it new? I love these platform of rifles as much as anyone and occasionally you do see a great deal or 2 but usually they aren't much cheaper than dealer prices especially if they are asking for shipping on top. I know I'll prob get flak for this post from a few people but I don't really care. People do have the right to ask what they believe the rifle is worth TO THEM but if you took the rifle to a legitimate dealer on trade in or straight up sale and got the true market value on a used rifle IMHO does anyone think you could ask near retail with no extras and quite commonly less mags than it originally came with? Just my .02 ...probably worth closer to .03 on the market LOL 



















































