Hey guys, I'm picking-up my new .17 HMR tomorrow 

and have been giving more thought/research to the scope I want for this rifle than I care to mention. I set-out the criteria~18x+ power, side focus, plain reticle/fine cross hairs, $300 budget, good online reviews...and came-up with the Mueller 8-32x44. Now, a TON of scope for a .17 HMR, but my goals include seeing how far away I can hit targets consistently. (and groundhogs inside of 150 yards
) So, I've read everything on the "CZ ring" saga here, and have done some digging around RFC. On this site, Talley rings seem to be the top pick, on RFC, they lean towards the 11mm to Weaver adapter opening-up the ring options. I'm a "keep it simple" kind of guy and like the idea of the Talley ones. I emailed Talley with the gun/scope specs., they responded "CZ HIGH RINGS". Are they likely to be TOO high for a 44mm objective? I've always like the aesthetic of scopes that ride as low as possible, but I have fat cheeks and seem to like the way stocks with slightly lower "combs" (right term?) feel when looking through scopes. I know that the bolt can be an issue on CZ that have low scopes, so that's a consideration too.
I'm sure you've seen these adapters, but here is some photos that show the 452 Varmint wearing the scope I'm after, and a close-up of the adapter;
I think it looks pretty good..imagine the 3" sunshade on there? lol
The mount...
So, am I complicating things...or just "go" with the Talley HIGH rings? Anybody here have a 452 Varmint with these Talleys?
Thanks,
Rob

I'm sure you've seen these adapters, but here is some photos that show the 452 Varmint wearing the scope I'm after, and a close-up of the adapter;
I think it looks pretty good..imagine the 3" sunshade on there? lol

The mount...

So, am I complicating things...or just "go" with the Talley HIGH rings? Anybody here have a 452 Varmint with these Talleys?
Thanks,
Rob