Did you know? 14 ROUNDS LEGAL

The wording of this particular law actually quite clearly allows for you to put whatever you want into whatever mag you want, and then put that mag into whatever gun it will fit.

Almost as if it were on purpose.

It is the magazine that is the prohibited item if it holds more than 10 rounds of the ammunition it was originally designed to hold.

Period.

The use is not defined, and conspicuous by it's absence.
Sounds like it was written quite well actually.
 
You do realize that the 10 round pistol mag capacity law counts for both ceterfire and rimfire right? The rimfire exemption is only for rim fire, semi auto rifles.

Well the ruger charger... takes the 10/22 mags... so the 25 rounders fit in them but they are made for the 10/22 rifle..
 
how many 9mm rounds will fit into a 33-cap Glock magazine?

Did you get an answer on this?


sadly no. it seems nobody knows. i have a feeling that the gating item is the woodchuck, actually. once we sort out the "how many 9mm rounds will fit into a woodchuck?" question, we get enough info to address the "how many 9mm rounds will fit into an original VW Beetle?", which then makes the 33-cap Glock mag question really easy to answer...

without the woodchuck, we have an enigma.






enigma. not enema.

:nest:
 
Sometimes the feed lips need a little tweaking...

It's not legal (probably) to do that, as Slavex alluded to, it must work as originally designed:

(b) any magazine that is capable of containing more than 10
cartridges of the type for which the magazine was originally designed
and that is designed or manufactured for use in a semi-automatic
handgun that is commonly available in Canada.

If you end up in court over this I guarantee that RCMP forensics will state in their report that the design of the magazine was altered if you fiddle with the feedlips, and you are in possession of a prohibited device.

Yes, you might be able to win in court, who knows, that's what courts are for but I wouldn't try it myself.

In my experience, very few .40 mags work properly unaltered with 9mm. Or any, in fact, just trying to think of one where it worked. Even if the lips hold the round they usually sit too high. If you're lucky you end up with a somewhat unreliable 12-round magazine, not worth the effort imv.
 
The problem with testing this is that woodchucks have very poor bullet retention qualities. The bullets just go straight through. Frequently the woodchuck loses structural integrity too.

worth a try, i suppose. i'm game. is the woodchuck game? :p

we ought to get 3 woodchucks - one control 'chuck, one 'chuck for determining how many (unfired) rounds can be chambered inside the woodchuck, and one 'chuck to check (fired) bullet capacity.

i have a feeling that the results will be quite shocking! moreso for the woodchuck... :D
 
I'm Gina say that the 31 round .40 for glocks are the same as the 33 round 9mm other than lips, nowhere on either does it say 33 or 31 on them that I've noticed anyhow but I never really looked. Just guessing.
 
This to me seems like a good way to end up getting your handguns taken way and having a big legal bill. Since we are only shooting at ranges why are hi cap mag's desirable anyway, if target shooting is the name of the game. Jeeze, my range only allows five rounds per mag! :(
 
Wouldn't one have a problem with the feeding? I mean, .40 S&W shells are slightly larger in diameter than 9mm, so the feed lips of the mag may have problems retaining the cartridges.
 
Back
Top Bottom