Diemaco C8 worth the price?

Status
Not open for further replies.
Actually, it is identical in every way. There are actually three sleeves produced: a simon sleeve, a suppressor sleeve, and an M203A1 sleeve. The CF does not use the simon sleeve. The C8A3 uses the M203A1 sleeve which is machined from pre-hardened steel to resist the recoil and counter recoil of the 40 mm LV, and phosphate to the MILSPEC. Despite the fact that commercial users will never have an M203A1, there are no "commercial" versions made from mild steel like the counterfeit copies. The only difference in the barrel assembly is the M4 extension that will allow for better use of non-NATO standard commercial ammunition. The phosphate is identical, the heavy chrome, rifling, barrel markings, cold rotary hammer forged barrel, front sight forging, flash hider and improved 5.56 mm carbine chamber are all identical to the CAF version. The proof marks and makers marks are identical to current military production.

The only differences are:

The semi-auto only parts: disconnect, hammer, selector, lower receiver pocket, and the early commercial AR15 style carrier made to the Colt's drawings from a Canadian MILSPEC carrier. The selector is a Colt commercial semi-auto. The hammer is made from a standard C7/8 hammer, and the trigger and springs (and nearly every other component) is identical.
Deletion of the CF extended cocking handle and ambi-mag release;
Black MILSPEC glass fibre filled furniture, as green is no longer in production;
The police and export sling plate as the CF plate is no longer in production;
M4 MIL-STD-1913 upper and extension to allow for commercial ammunition and non-weaver scopes. Weaver scopes will still fit, but 1913 scopes would not fit on a Weaver upper;
The commercial Diemaco markings.

Any idea when or if other bits and pieces will be avail separately?....Black C8 stocks. Old school Diemaco A1 detachable carry handle iron sights. Complete Iron sight upper?
 
Take initiative and go manufacture a Canadian AR offering the same features and quality at a more competitive price. Contracting a clone to a Chinese slave factory with a landed price point of $600 is easy. You just fire off a few emails.

Try to make something within Canada and turn a profit now with appalling things like living wages, taxes, insurance, employee pension contributions etc.

How does NEA do it and keep prices to $800 retail? Are wages lower in the US for skilled CNC operators? I guess Colt USA pays Chinese wages to their staff in order to make $1100 retail for their offerings? Must be a HUGE number of skilled labour in the US applying for Colt Canada jobs.... Cuz it's such better pay and benefits.
How about cars/trucks/ATV that are 100% made in Canada that the manufacturer has no problem selling these for thousands of dollars less in the US but, do everything in their power to keep us from buying them in the US, and like charging us 30-50% more in some cases?
It's a Canadian mindset that it's OK to get screwed at retail....I ain't a part of that.
 
For 2 grand it's a slap in the face to have to spend another hundred on the norgon that should be on it already...

(Lefty loves the norgon)

Distributor gouging, and downgrading of the feature set to make a few more bucks on a premium product... I'm sad

Will wait a year, for the shine to wear off, and see what they are going for then.

Meanwhile, the much maligned NEA is taking my money. Go Canada.

I'm with Hitzy
 
Those that want to shirk a commitment to Canada and the Canadian firearms industry will find any loophole to talk it down, like distributor markup (still a Canadian firearms industry company, champs). Common sense would indicate to anyone buying ARs built by a company with as much history as Colt Canada means ten times to our sport what a Norinco does, and it's a gun you can be rightfully proud to own. It will NEVER compete with a rifle assembled by a $7.25 an hour labourer in South Carolina. They shouldn't be expected to either. Buying Colt Canada, or PGW, or any Canadian maker means a lot more than just buying a gun. An entire generation or more has forgotten what it means to support the home team and it's not sad, it's shameful.

Just who the hell do you think you are? Seriously. Who was comparing them to Norinco? Yes, Korth is a Canadian company. They made a decision to take more than a normal pound of flesh for each rifle. That seems a bit much. Like I said, I may still buy one. Also, I am comparing the Colt Canada to KAC which is not the same as comparing it to Norinco. A KAC rifle will likely cost about the same or maybe even more. Your soapbox yelling will not affect my decision. In my opinion, the CC guns ARE worth the money but getting a$$ raped as part of the "buy Canadian" process is a bit harsh. If you are getting butt hurt by my and others reaction to that, so be it.
 
Those that want to shirk a commitment to Canada and the Canadian firearms industry will find any loophole to talk it down, like distributor markup (still a Canadian firearms industry company, champs). Common sense would indicate to anyone buying ARs built by a company with as much history as Colt Canada means ten times to our sport what a Norinco does, and it's a gun you can be rightfully proud to own. It will NEVER compete with a rifle assembled by a $7.25 an hour labourer in South Carolina. They shouldn't be expected to either. Buying Colt Canada, or PGW, or any Canadian maker means a lot more than just buying a gun. An entire generation or more has forgotten what it means to support the home team and it's not sad, it's shameful.

Why don't you buy me one then? Make that 2.

How does NEA do it and keep prices to $800 retail? Are wages lower in the US for skilled CNC operators? I guess Colt USA pays Chinese wages to their staff in order to make $1100 retail for their offerings? Must be a HUGE number of skilled labour in the US applying for Colt Canada jobs.... Cuz it's such better pay and benefits.
How about cars/trucks/ATV that are 100% made in Canada that the manufacturer has no problem selling these for thousands of dollars less in the US but, do everything in their power to keep us from buying them in the US, and like charging us 30-50% more in some cases?
It's a Canadian mindset that it's OK to get screwed at retail....I ain't a part of that.

Pretty much hit the nail on the head.
 
Yep, and you still don't get what it means to buy a Canadian product, in our small Canadian industry. Supporting Canadian workers jobs, that when the legislators seek to ban rifles that is critical. If you really think or expect a small plant in Canada, paying real wages, is going to compete with a US mass production plant or worse China (you seem to suggest US however) you've missed the point completely. This isn't about specs, this is about an excellent AR that is made HERE, by Canadians. Yes, that costs more, and rightfully so. Buy local is dead in this country, and it's like trying to talk to a Liberal about gun control; it just doesn't compute and a bunch of folks keep going back to, "But I don't see the value. I can get that cheaper…" That's not the bloody point now of a homegrown rifle, is it. There is a damn right pride of ownership in owning a Canadian product and supporting our fellow Canadians, in our little industry and group. Those that can't even recognize that and keep going back to "…but the value" are a lost cause.

That patriotic M.O. works both ways. There's no need for Canadian retailers to rape the public while trying to make a buck. You can beat your patriotic chest all you want, but its plain stupid to pay the ridiculous prices being asked for these rifles so some "patriotic" Canadian dealer and manufacturer(which CC is not!) can get rich. Your ignorance can fund their lifestyle, I'll keep my pride and intelligence and fund mine.

The problem with this argument is that we aren't supporting Colt Canada, we are supporting Korth who are charging an extra $500+ per rifle in the hopes of taking advantage of our patriotism. I would LOVE to own one of these rifles and a HUGE part of that is because it is Canadian made. But I will NOT be taken advantage of. That's the issue people are having with this rifle and the reason these threads keep popping up. We all want one. Had CC and Korth priced these appropriately they'd be flying off the shelves. Christ, they'd out sell Norincos. But most people's patriotism starts to wane when they see something is so grossly overpriced.

A lot of people refuse to go anywhere else for their coffee but Tim Horton's because they are (were?) a Canadian company. If Timmy's starting charging $10 a cup that would change in a heart beat.

With all that being said, I'm really glad to hear that CC is coming through with their mil/LEO discount. I don't qualify for it but many here do and I'm happy for them.

Well said sir.

How does NEA do it and keep prices to $800 retail? Are wages lower in the US for skilled CNC operators? I guess Colt USA pays Chinese wages to their staff in order to make $1100 retail for their offerings? Must be a HUGE number of skilled labour in the US applying for Colt Canada jobs.... Cuz it's such better pay and benefits.
How about cars/trucks/ATV that are 100% made in Canada that the manufacturer has no problem selling these for thousands of dollars less in the US but, do everything in their power to keep us from buying them in the US, and like charging us 30-50% more in some cases?
It's a Canadian mindset that it's OK to get screwed at retail....I ain't a part of that.

Good points. I see that an NEA lower is available now for $65, and there is still profit in that price for both NEA and the dealer. So why does the CC cost so much?? Colt USA as mentioned about a thousand times can be had for a little over a grand, and there's profit for both Colt and IRG before getting to my door. So why is a CC rifle so much?

Many a folk here need to open their eyes and try thinking for themselves. CC is raping the consumer and some here are happy to bend over! Then again, you can't rape the willing...

TDC
 
I think what CC should have done is to sell directly to the retailers and not a middle man who is making a buck in my eyes for doing nothing. I bet that would have knocked off $500-600 of the price. I am in favour of giving my money to canadian company's , but it's time that they drop their prices too and be more competive . Im happy that a company like IRG is here . The last AR I bought was imported from the US and I saved $1000 to my door. Yes company's need to make a profit , well how much is enough ?
 
Canada just deployed special operations teams to Iraq to help combat those head chopping psychopaths. They're bringing C8s and C7s with them; these aren't $1000 rifles ;)

I'm willing to bet most dudes who have used C7s and C8s, some of which are 20+ years old (rifles, though I suppose dudes too), will support the fact that the guns get treated like #### and keep on sending freedom down range with minimal ministrations from the weapon techs. They're amazing guns.


The first time I see one at the range I will be impressed. "Oooooo! Ahhhhhh, man. You are super duper cool and rich to have one!"

If you find yourself on a two-way range you may be a little more appreciative.
 
Canada just deployed special operations teams to Iraq to help combat those head chopping psychopaths. They're bringing C8s and C7s with them; these aren't $1000 rifles ;)

I'm willing to bet most dudes who have used C7s and C8s, some of which are 20+ years old (rifles, though I suppose dudes too), will support the fact that the guns get treated like #### and keep on sending freedom down range with minimal ministrations from the weapon techs. They're amazing guns.




If you find yourself on a two-way range you may be a little more appreciative.

so........ a 1000$ USA colt m4 is not worthy to be carried in battle??? I don't understand the argument.
 
LOL. The "if you had been in the Sh]t you'd appreciate this rifle" line. There's nothing wrong with the C7 I was issued, or the FNC1 before that. We're talking price.
 
Canada just deployed special operations teams to Iraq to help combat those head chopping psychopaths. They're bringing C8s and C7s with them; these aren't $1000 rifles ;)

I'm willing to bet most dudes who have used C7s and C8s, some of which are 20+ years old (rifles, though I suppose dudes too), will support the fact that the guns get treated like #### and keep on sending freedom down range with minimal ministrations from the weapon techs. They're amazing guns.




If you find yourself on a two-way range you may be a little more appreciative.


Ok Rambo, thanks for keeping me safe. :rolleyes:

TDC
 
One aspect that hasn't come up when comparing the prices of the Wal-Mart Colts versus the Canadian Colts is volume sold and how it affects the price. If CC were selling the tens of thousands of rifles that USA Colt does per year their price would be much closer to the USA Colts price. So it's not so much Colt Canada gouging us as it is the way supply and demand works or in this case doesn't.

I do believe we are being gouged by the middle man though (cough, Korth), isn't that all they do (the middle man I mean LOL) and therefore should be avoided whenever possible. It's to bad CC didn't see it that way and gone directly to our CGN retailers, because this may have dropped the price by $500. If so then there would be a new CC in my safe instead of the DD I went with for a $1,000 less, cold hammer forged barrel and all.
Yes I still want a Canadian made Colt (I used a C7A1 in the reserves and realize how really durable and accurate these rifles are) even though my DD is an excellent example of an AR and probably the closest comparison to a CC w/o spending more then what a CC costs. In the case of the CC at $2,140 versus the DD at $1,200 I had to calculate the value in paying a $1,000 more (with taxes in) for arguably the same (or very similar) rifle and in this case the value didn't compute.
Had the difference been only $500 there would probably be a CC in the safe by now. For those wondering why I would pay $500 more for what would seem a similar rifle, I guess the answer is 1.) I do want a rifle similar to the one I had in the Army, 2.) Knowing firsthand how much abuse these rifles can take and still shoot accurately allows me great confidence that I think would be difficult to find in any other AR and 3.) Owning a premium quality Canadian made product is something I am proud of and am willing to pay extra for; if that makes me a sucker instead of a proud Canadian it's something I can live with, just be careful saying it to my face.
So I'll wait and see if the prices come down to a more competitive level or bide my time waiting for what I really want a 14.5" IUR.
 
Last edited:
I think what CC should have done is to sell directly to the retailers and not a middle man who is making a buck in my eyes for doing nothing. I bet that would have knocked off $500-600 of the price. I am in favour of giving my money to canadian company's , but it's time that they drop their prices too and be more competive . Im happy that a company like IRG is here . The last AR I bought was imported from the US and I saved $1000 to my door. Yes company's need to make a profit , well how much is enough ?

Considering how sporting goods was one of the first to receive free trade under the North American free Trade Agreement., I have to ask myself., what happened? Tires and auto parts are other good examples!
 
so........ a 1000$ USA colt m4 is not worthy to be carried in battle??? I don't understand the argument.

because you guys keep talking about $1000 Colt LE editions. There's a difference between a C7A1 variant and a $1000 colt Ar15, same as there's a difference between a Toyota 4Runner SE and a RAV4.


Ok Rambo, thanks for keeping me safe. :rolleyes:

TDC

You're welcome kido.
 
Canada just deployed special operations teams to Iraq to help combat those head chopping psychopaths. They're bringing C8s and C7s with them; these aren't $1000 rifles ;)

I'm willing to bet most dudes who have used C7s and C8s, some of which are 20+ years old (rifles, though I suppose dudes too), will support the fact that the guns get treated like #### and keep on sending freedom down range with minimal ministrations from the weapon techs. They're amazing guns.




If you find yourself on a two-way range you may be a little more appreciative.
Not that they will need the rifles given their orders.

Canada to send special operations personnel to Iraq

STEVEN CHASE

NEWPORT, WALES — The Globe and Mail

Published Friday, Sep. 05 2014, 8:25 AM EDT

Canada is deploying Canadian Armed Forces special operations personnel to Iraq as part of a U.S.-led 10-nation coalition to battle the spread of the Islamic State militia that’s wreaking havoc across that beleaguered country.

Prime Minister Stephen Harper says his government will deploy “several dozen” military advisers to Iraq to provide strategic and tactical help for the Baghdad government as it battles the Islamic State of Iraq and the Levant (ISIL).

The “core coalition” of countries formed by the U.S. will focus on assisting Iraqi forces fighting the Islamic state and will not dispatching troops to enter in combat with ISIL.
Mr. Harper made the announcement at a NATO summit near Cardiff, Wales, where alliance leaders gathered to discuss how to beat back the threat posed by the Islamic state, which has cut a swathe of destruction from Syria to Iraq.
“The fanaticism of the ISIL terrorist group is a real threat to regional security and millions of innocent people in Iraq, Syria and beyond,” Mr. Harper said in a statement.

“Left unchecked, ISIL is also a direct threat to Canada and its allies. [This] deployment ... is a concrete measure to deter the murderous rampage of ISIL and respond to the humanitarian crisis it has caused,” Mr. Harper said.

The initial deployment will be for a period of up to 30 days. It will be reassessed after that time, Canada said.
The Canadian government said opposition leaders are being briefed on this decision and that a special meeting of the House of Commons Standing Committee on Foreign Affairs and International Development will be convened at the earliest opportunity in order for the Ministers of Foreign Affairs and National Defence to provide information to Members of Parliament.
In August, Canada dispatched heavy lift planes to assist in the delivery of critical military supplies from contributing allies to forces fighting ISIL.

In the last few days Ottawa has contributed $10-million in non-lethal military equipment to security forces combatting ISIL as well as $5-million to support regional efforts to limit the move of foreign fighters into Iraq and Syria.
It’s also distributed a second round of relief supplies to aid those affected in Iraq as well as $5-million for emergency shelters and relief equipment as well as $2-million for urgent care services in the region.

http://www.theglobeandmail.com/news/politics/canada-to-send-advisers-to-assist-coalition-battling-islamic-state/article20359102/
 
Not that they will need the rifles given their orders.

The advisers we had working with the Afghan National Army in Afghanistan routinely saw more combat than our "front line" soldiers; atleast outside of dedicated ops. Being called an adviser doesn't move them away from combat, it's actually quite the opposite.
 
[

because you guys keep talking about $1000 Colt LE editions. There's a difference between a C7A1 variant and a $1000 colt Ar15, same as there's a difference between a Toyota 4Runner SE and a RAV4.




You're welcome kido.
Yep, there is a difference between a 6390 and an M4.....actually maybe less then the difference between the C7/C8 and these civvy versions.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Back
Top Bottom