Dlask 20th Anniversary Edition Lower Receiver

Status
Not open for further replies.
Quote:
Originally Posted by Westicle
how can dlask inscribe full auto settings an yet ATR cannot ??



Ummmmn, whether I believe the "faux auto" markings are a good idea (I don't) or not, maybe we could avoid turning in our competitors & brothers to the man for a change.

Whether it's legitimate sour grapes or not, all this running to the authorities is like a school yard fight where the bully runs to the school yard teacher to help bully the other kids.

I realize that ATR is not trying to specificly hammer DLASK, but for crying out loud, don't we think about the consequences of our actions for a Frakin' change.

Good point!! It was never my intent to create a problem for another maker, and I think to raise this issue may in fact cause Joe some problems that no-one needs, so will leave it alone. Fortunately you PMed me before I called Ottawa. Thanks!

It would be nice if the federal laws were consistent and administered evenly.
 
Good point!! It was never my intent to create a problem for another maker, and I think to raise this issue may in fact cause Joe some problems that no-one needs, so will leave it alone. Fortunately you PMed me before I called Ottawa. Thanks!

It would be nice if the federal laws were consistent and administered evenly.


Glad you changed your mind.I know it's tough to watch someone else do what you are not allowed to and let it go. In the end we are all going to be better off for it. There is far more demand then supply so ther is plenty to go around personally I like the look of your new lower a little better.
It is on my wish list for later this year.
 
Looks great. Anyone bought a Dlask lower recently care to comment if they are now built in spec?

Last Dlask lower I built up was maybe 2 years ago. At that time, it went together like butter and was a nice and really tight fit to my Armalite M4-style upper. If these new ones are as well dimensioned as that lower 2 years ago was, it should be a great AR receiver.
 
ok, you want to play that game eh.... they look to me similar to the ones that ATR rick submitted to the RCMP and was denied permission to put on his AR15's because it would change the classification of the firearm to prohibited status.. just for the markings. similar reason why the GSG .22lr mp5 clone clone is prohibited.... because it looks evil

no rhyme or reason..... the case has been decided, I am sure the rcmp documented when ATR applied to use those markings and it was publicized here..... so the case has been set, now dlask comes out with the same "similar" markings, so you decide if the RCMP is going to go back on the ruling they made less then a month ago.

here is a picture of what it I assume he submitted since it is in his lower thread
1SELECTORS-AT.jpg

OK I lied, but I tried:D, the symbols in Rick’s receiver is also on HK’s 416, but symbols shmymbols. Reaper’s got a good point, you might want to head his words of wisdom. ;)
 
The original intention was 223 pieces,
but personally, I doubt this number will ever be reached
in this limited edition receiver.
Right now, like in the last 3 years,
production and priorities are very dynamic in Dlask Arms.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Back
Top Bottom