Do You Support Ownership of FA (full auto) Firearms?

[Silveragent]

As for the question about who here has fired full auto. I think everyone has the opportunity to whenever they cross the border. I fired a full auto AR in Vegas. It was an illuminating experience. First shot: on target. Every following shot, er somewhere high and to the right This is not to say one couldn't improve, obviously. It was both very fun and something I would love to do again... on someone else's dime.

And I would totally rather have mag restrictions gone and suppressors allowed first.

 

[andrew3081]

It's possible. It's possible today well. I don't think the likelihood increases or decreases.

The full auto firearm would increase the injuries and fatalities.

 

[joe-nwt]

So your logic is saying that if full auto firearm is legal.. A law aiding gun owner would not go crazy and do a mass shooting?
Can you guarantee that won't happen? Wait, you can't.. Because there are cases of mass shooting with semi auto firearms already.
And who knows what a crazy person think like? For all I know he/she probably think auto fire guns kill people faster.

There you have it. That's why the anti's want to take your guns away. Because YOU might come unglued at any momemt.

How does that make you feel?

 

[joe-nwt]

Are you stalking me? The choices are "yes" (with guidelines, because we're not in Fantasyland), "maybe" (with additional criteria/certification/qualification) or "no".

It basically comes down to are you prepared to live with the same requirements for FA that exist in the USA, would you like to see additional requirements in Canada - or do you either not see the need for, disagree with or are not prepared to 'jump through the hoops' for FA in Canada.

Are you baiting me?


Why not offer more choices instead of creating a poll fitting for the newspapers of Toronto? Because except for the hints that YOU as a firearm owner are not to be trusted, I don't have a problem with YOU having full auto. You have an RPAL, don't you? Doesn't that mean that you have passed all the criteria to own a firearm? Why would I want to impose some further caveats on you?

Are you implying that maybe you are not as sane and responsible as you claim to be? We await your response.

 

[mmattockx]

^ moron.

If you can be trusted with a bolt action, you can be trusted with a full auto. There's really no difference. I voted yes, but I don't agree with licensing of any sort.

+1. I voted yes as well, but FA needs no more restrictions than any other gun.

I never get the concept of owning a full auto firearm?
First...you can't target shot with full auto...you wont hit ****.
Second...you will be broke from all the ammo cost.




There is no difference in bolt action and full auto?
Who's the moron ... lol

Nice. Since you have no use for FA you don't think anyone else should own one either? How very communist of you, comrade. There IS no difference between a bolt action and FA, you're the moron in that case if really believe that.


Mark

 

[cote_b]

A gun is a gun and a target at the gun range knows no difference between any gun. I voted yes.

 

[lone-wolf]

The full auto firearm would increase the injuries and fatalities.

What brings you to this conclusion? What sources, data?

 

[andrew3081]

There you have it. That's why the anti's want to take your guns away. Because YOU might come unglued at any momemt.

How does that make you feel?

I am talking about other people. Since when did I mention I would become 'unglued'?
Just because you can't take the facts of life.
We have no control over other people and their actions.

What brings you to this conclusion? What sources, data?

I didnt know we have data for common sense nowadays.

In a crowded area, 5 bullets per second will do more damage than 1 bullet per second.

+1. I voted yes as well, but FA needs no more restrictions than any other gun.




Nice. Since you have no use for FA you don't think anyone else should own one either? How very communist of you, comrade. There IS no difference between a bolt action and FA, you're the moron in that case if really believe that.


Mark

Hi comrade Mark,
I am expressing my views and you are expressing yours.
If there is no difference between full auto firearm and bolt action firearm, then why do we have 2 names for it?

 

[Blessed]

I'd like to send a big ******** ! out to everyone who voted no. You are no better than the anti's. The pathetic mewling about how YOU don't see any reason to own full auto's therefore YOU don't think anyone else should be able to own one makes me want to hit you with something heavy.

Our society is not based on what YOU think other people should do with their money. Would like it for me to come into your home and decide what YOU should or should not have? Probably not, so why not pull your head out of your ass and give the rest of us the benefit of the doubt?

****, I was having a good day till I read this BS ......

Actually, your response is kind of why I would lean more towards no than I would yes.

 

[Aries-]

i voted yes, as i dont see why not, people can waste their money on all that ammo if they like, i wont. i dont have a need or reason to buy one so i wouldn't, but lots of people have the money for the gun and ammo they will use.

 

[lone-wolf]

I didnt know we have data for common sense nowadays.

In a crowded area, 5 bullets per second will do more damage than 1 bullet per second.

Common sense tells me 5 rounds of controlled aimed fire is more dangerous then uncontrolled automatic fire. Yes, data is usually needed for the cost benefit analysis that govern our lives.

 

[joe-nwt]

I am talking about other people. Since when did I mention I would become 'unglued'?
Just because you can't take the facts of life.
We have no control over other people and their actions.

I'm talking about YOU and why the anti's want YOUR guns. Do you own guns? Then that's what the anti's think.

Real crazies rarely question their sanity..........

 

[andrew3081]

Common sense tells me 5 rounds of controlled aimed fire is more dangerous then uncontrolled automatic fire. Yes, data is usually needed for the cost benefit analysis that govern our lives.

In a crowed area? I do not think so.

I'm talking about YOU and why the anti's want YOUR guns. Do you own guns? Then that's what the anti's think.

Real crazies rarely question their sanity..........

I was talking about people to start with, why are we talking about me now?
No I don't own guns..I just like posting on here................
Lol
If. I am crazy, then by would I care if other people get hurt or not?

 

[joe-nwt]

i voted yes, as i dont see why not, people can waste their money on all that ammo if they like, i wont. i dont have a need or reason to buy one so i wouldn't, but lots of people have the money for the gun and ammo they will use.

So if I had a full auto and offered to let you shoot you would decline?

 

[joe-nwt]

BTW, I would like to thank the mad polster, Blaxsun, for bringing out all the closrt liberals. I hope CGNers are taking notes.

 

[cote_b]

Anyone on here saying no obviously has never fired full auto before.

 

[Curly1]

Full Auto would be useless if you are still restricted to 5 round mag limits.

 

[cote_b]

Full Auto would be useless if you are still restricted to 5 round mag limits.

Full auto 5 rounds would be better than no full auto at all. Besides, belt feds designed and produced before 1946 would still have no belt capacity limits,full auto .22 would have no mag limits, anything that takes an LAR mag would still have a 10 round capacity and anything that takes a pistol mag would still have a 10 round capacity. That would still be alot of fun.

Id imagine we would have mag limits removed before full auto would be allowed, but id take it either way.

 

[haha49]

People already legally own full auto firearms they just can't shoot them legally anymore. New people can't get them as they're Grandfathered in. Lots of them went poof when a owner passed away because people gave them away or hide them. Making it so only few people can have it just makes people want them more and creates a black market and makes some people hide/give them away.

 

[cadgo]

BTW, I would like to thank the mad polster, Blaxsun, for bringing out all the closrt liberals. I hope CGNers are taking notes.

+1. Although I would have a worse name for them than liberals.... if that is even possible.