X2
Thanks
Sorry guys...My tech guy is in the midfle of a move, and also I was busy yeserday and today...I have sent the raw data to him to try and sort through. Hopefully we will have it up shortly!
Thanks for your patience!
X2
Thanks
I have always used my match deficiencies to determine what I need to practice, not what I need to suggest that match directors change.
Next week at FNH, a few of us will be taking shots at 450y. There is no way we can practice that and be proficient. That doesn't mean any one of us is about to suggest that the MD make them bonus rounds, or bring them closer.
Matches always have to have a challenge, but be doable. Most of us like that challenge. A 450y shot is doable. I plan on chronying my ammo and know my trajectories from 50 to 300y and using a calculator to make a good attempt at those ranges.
If I miss, I won't be about to say that its unfair. AFAIK, as long as guys on the AMU can make shots from 600-800y with iron sights, than anything I miss that is easier than that is entirely my fault
. If you don't belong to EESA or Guelph you're pretty much screwed.
.
Psst..............EESA membership is CHEAP!
Given that FNH is one of the big US matches, you know it's going to be tougher than hell from the get go.
Would you say that FNH is newbie friendly though? Absolutely not, and everyone knows it isn't
Newbies know not to sign up.
Some of the big matches are doing the Pro/Am thing in order to make the matches more accessible to less experienced shooters.
I'm just trying to help suggest things that would help with making the match more attractive to new shooters
making some small changes would help encourage the new shooters more.
When I've MD'ed my own local matches or designed stages, I go out of my way to ask the shooters what they like and don't like, etc.
Psst..............EESA membership is CHEAP!
Bottom line is we all took something away from the match that we can improve on to come back stronger the next time.
Whether we make the effort to improve is up to us, and our future scores will reflect it.
We all started somewhere
I respectfully suggest you don't know what you're talking about
Having shot it I'd say yes... It's very newbie friendly. Everyone helps and supports the new shooters at these matches.
I don't think new shooters need to be encouraged... If they're motivated they'll come out. If they're scared they won't.
Take it a step further and ask them what score they'd like too...![]()
I'm just bustin' yer balls man... But hey, if we can't speak freely what's the point of all this chatter.
You shouldn't have said that...next year Craig will incorporate a firewalk into one of the stages...imagine the whining then!![]()
I mean no disrespect but there really is no reason why a 200yrd shot on a 8 to 10 inch plate isn't doable.
Well, I can tell you that timing out is pretty discouraging. When that par time beeps, it's like someone holding up a big blinking red sign that says FAIL. I think the goal of the par time should be to keep the match moving, not to differentiate good shooters from bad shooters. I think the stage should be designed so that a high proportion of people won't time out. The par times have to be there, no doubt about it, or the match will drag for eternity. Someone will always time out, that is unavoidable, but I think we can probably agree it's nicer if most people get a chance to shoot at all the targets.

Hey I was using a bolt gun, Craig give me some bonus points!![]()




























