canadian hunter312
CGN Ultra frequent flyer
- Location
- Brant County
They haven’t changed him anything by what’s been laid out in this thread.
VR’s first post contains such information.
Have you been following this thread at all?
They haven’t changed him anything by what’s been laid out in this thread.
Yes I have. Have you?VR’s first post contains such information.
Have you been following this thread at all?![]()
There was no restocking fees.
He 100% told me that's called a restocking fees. I'd asked him few times. That's why I was surprised and said how to restock something that's not in stock but he said that's the way it is so be it. I said ok with it and asked him nicely for the refund process.There was no restocking fees.
^^^^^At a really basic level:
If the item he ordered was shown as “in stock,” but it actually wasn’t. And when he asked for a refund, they still charged him a cancellation fee. That’s really unfair on VR’s part—the mistake was in their inventory, not the customer’s.
But maybe I'm misunderstanding the situation. No you are not misunderstanding.
I had already agreed to pay for the restocking fees which there are actually no stock to be restocked.
And that's why we never charged this restocking fee he keeps bringing up falsely.“I was just following orders”
I’ve had companies, regularly offer me 5-10% off if I picked a substitute product as an apology for not having advertised stock as purchased, let alone expecting someone to pay a fee for your mishandling? Policy or not that’s what this comes down to, you guys sold something you didn’t have, so it was never sold, so no return was possible.
I feel that $7.34 dollars cost VR alot more than that in lost business.I feel like starting this thread should cost more than $7.34.
I think your terms of service just screwed you out of a bunch of future business.It's not about the $7 it's about our terms of service and letting the customer know that it is 100% normal to charge a processing fee for refunds, regardless of the amount. These processes are largely automated and require additional inputs to override this in exceptional circumstances. While upset over the processing fee this customer is now trying to say we took too long to process the refund, even though it was end of day yesterday and we processed it before mid-day today.
The restocking fee is an automatic thing on the business web side, and requires a manual override on our part. Which we did. The next day. In less than 24hrs, probably in less than 12 hours.View attachment 1046984
This is such a great idea for a business concept:
Sell items you don't have, then charge restocking fees, when the customer cancels the order, after a lot of frustration.
Make all you money from restocking fees!
Genius!!!!!!!!
Summary from my end of the situation:Full Summary from our end of the situation:
When you first contacted our team, we advised that the only version of the stainless steel muzzle brake we had in stock at that time was the Rock-Solid model.
When the order came through online, it was for a different model than the one discussed over the phone.
As requested, we had already put the Rock-Solid brake aside under your name. When our shipping team went to process your order and noticed the mismatch, we called to let you know right away.
During that call, you mentioned you did not want the Rock-Solid model as it was “too long for competition” — however, the Rock-Solid is only 5mm longer than the Defiant, which generally does not impact competition compliance.
Because the order needed to be cancelled, our standard policy is to deduct the 5% payment processing fee — as outlined in our terms of service.
However, to ensure you are not left feeling dissatisfied, and to make up for the incorrect inventory shown, we have waived the processing fee entirely and processed a full refund back to your original method of payment (yes, it has already been processed on our end).
We are always willing to admit when we could have handled communication more clearly, and we appreciate your feedback as it helps us improve our service and online ordering clarity.
We do kindly ask that reviews accurately reflect the situation, as public comments have a real impact on small Canadian businesses and our team who work very hard to support our customers every day.
If there is anything further you would like to discuss — or if you need assistance selecting the correct part in the future — we would be happy to help. That’s what we’re here for.
-Victory Ridge Sports Management
But only one in broken English.Well, at least we have both sides of the story now.
Had tried my best if you are referring me...But only one in broken English.
It’s all good. I just sense a great deal of confusion, and a language barrier can’t make it any easier.Had tried my best if you are referring me...![]()
We appreciate the perspective - we don't judge how anyone chooses to pay for their gear...whether it is all at once or a little at a time. If Sezzle helps someone get the parts they want sooner so they can get out shooting, that's a win for both sides.Well that was entertaining. I think a bit of miscommunication on both sides. Everything seems to have been worked out besides for the arguments from the peanut gallery.
Everyone whines and complains about dealers closing complaint threads but VR has a habit of keeping them open and people still complain even when they resolve stuff. I don’t think either side is 100% right but at least VR isn’t try to hide what’s going on to the rest of the forum. No matter what you do you can please everyone.
I gotta say it. Sezzle for a muzzlebrake. Lol.




























