Eotech/Aimpoint On the hand-guard... Its a Canadian thing.

FTW Syntax

Regular
EE Expired
Rating - 0%
0   0   0
So I noticed all the elite JTF2/CSOR operator dudes like but there Eotechs/Aimpoints on their hand guard.

Why?

jtf2haiti57ledj4.jpg

jtf2afghanistan103cjkb3.jpg

image.jpeg
2617829325_ef16879b6d_z.jpg

jtf-2.jpg

9f3719d5.jpg



Looks like the NCO was the one with the Eotech on the hand guard. Throw back to fixed caring handle days?
 
You have a larger field of view outside the housing of the optic. Make a circle with your fingers then place that 6 inches from your eye. Look around and notice how much your hand blocks your view. Now hold it 12-18 inches from your eye, you can see more of your "environment" instead of your hand. That's how I see it anyways

Edit: only works with 1x mag that I've noticed, where no eye relief is needed
 
My understanding is that it it allows for faster target acquisition at close ranges. The 1st and 4th shot looks like close protection details (were my info was applied from), 5th pic looks like a contractor (old habits die hard?), 3rd and 6th pic looks like they would get the same advantage of the forward mounted optics. 3rd one: :confused:
 
There was a thread about this on ar15.com months ago. They had some good reasons but my peabrain can not remember.
 
One of the theories behind red dot/holo type sights was always to run them as far forward as possible. I actually tried it once on my AR just goofing around, using the carry handle and my Aimpoint out on the quad rail. Surprisingly wasn't that bad, even though it looks a little weird. I always found the dot very fast with both eyes open, actually felt pretty natural.
With JTF2 it's probably just a unit SOP that's stuck around from when they only had the fixed carry handle C8's, though it looks like now each guy has the option to set up his rifle to his personal preference from those pics at the bottom. Either way, I'm sure those fellas know what they're doing.
 
No its not in the SOP's, they are pretty free to run there kit however they please. Maybe for additional head space when running their NVG's.
 
How would the optics hold up to the heat being produced by the barrel underneath it? Would the optic hold up then or woul it fail from the heat?
 
From what I have been told my some folks in the military (not JTF themselves) is for two reasons, both stated. There average GI's though so take it for what it is

1) More room for night vision systems mounted on the helmet
2) More spatial awareness ahead of them, eyes on the target first, optic follows
 
Last edited:
When I was in, friends in CSOR said they like it because as the rifle is raised from the low ready they can pick up the dot/holosight quicker.

Most used a detachable carry handle, I would be shocked to see a unit with the funding of CSOR using fixed carry handles.

I was never a fan of forward mounting, mostly because with the M203 the last thing I needed was more weight forward on the rifle. But overseas magnified optics were essential IMO, so I used a 1-4x.
 
1. Optics are not viewed with a helmet mounted NOD, that's what a PEQ/PAQ is for.

2. The reason some of them run their EOs like that is because some guys are running older uppers with fixed carry handles. Even after switching to a flat top upper some guys keep them there because it allows you to pickup the reticle with more speed during presentation.....remember, red dots were originally designed for use on handguns. Picture a cone coming out from the rear of the optic, if your head is in the cone the sooner you can see it, the further away the optic the wider the cone......if that makes sense.

3. You'll see some morons in the regular army do this without realizing that you can't just throw it up on your handguards, these people are stupid and are not to be emulated. You need a floated rail or one that simulates freefloat, KAC/DD ext...the same goes for mounting lasers.
 
The Eotechs that the CF uses have a nightvision setting for the reticle where, I assume, you will see the dot with your NVGs on. You can also buy Aimpoints with the same nightvision setting.
 
The Eotechs that the CF uses have a nightvision setting for the reticle where, I assume, you will see the dot with your NVGs on. You can also buy Aimpoints with the same nightvision setting.

For that, I believe (WILD SPECULATION!!!) that setting is for configurations such as TV-PressPass (sorry if I screwed up the Username) has on his Tavor, with the NOD and optic mounted, co-witnessed on the same rail.
 
Last edited:
I use to run my Eotech like that before I was told not to. Apparently heat generates failures in Eotechs. Mine never did fail (doesn't get all THAT warm shooting short strings in semi only) but I ditched the Eotech way back when anyways.
 
Back
Top Bottom