mebiuspower said:
No way man, if you've got a suicide craft coming towards you you need to stop it cold. .50's were marginal back in early WW2, and that was with 8 of them firing all at once at unprotected Japanese planes.
For example the fate of task force Z early on made the point abundantly clear that if you have to do real life-and-death shooting you want 30mm, 40mm or more. My understanding is that small guns are popular in peace time because they're cheap, small, and easy. But they're cheap for a reason. And that's comparing to 1 and 2 pounders, let alone puny .50's.
I don't know why I care, lol, it's just that it's kind of infuriating to see history repeating itself I guess. I mean, if PomPoms aren't considered the best value for stopping suicide craft what the hell chance does a Gatling .50 have?
When the international shtf Rheinmetall and Bofors are going to have more orders then they'll know what to do with. Sure a .50 could be mounted with less disruption and cost, but the actual value is going to be slight. An actual cannon, OTOH, would be useful in many ways. Hell, if they can't spare the mass of a decent cannon, then why not a 40mm AGL? I dunno, .50 gatling just seems like eye candy and either too much or too little gun for most targets.
Not to mention the lack of protection for the gunner. The next time a vessel goes into an inlet and a swarm of Iranian speed boats charges, you can bet they'd rather have a gun suitable for stopping craft and fast. With that Gatling .50 they'd be getting shot at, trying to aim, walking the bullets on target, then having to reload. The French have a complete turret with 40mm autocannon and optics and everything that's under 1.5 tons, and the Ukrainians can make aircraft cannons light enough for a man to lift them.
It's just silly to mount a gatling firing FMJ when you can have the following: (pics are big, but blame the Germans)
http://www.rheinmetall-defence.com/img/MA-8_40S0307-66_1.jpg