yea fake is legal
but its not a conversation you would want to have with a cop if he pulled you over.
Find out the thread of your faux suppresor, and have the bbl threaded to match. Same as for a brake, no problems. - dan
If one were to take the position of Devils advocate, one could argue that even a fake can reduces the sound level. But, like many areas of our laws, this has not been tested in court, so remains an area of debate.
Seriously...why would you want to put more weight on the barrel, potentially change your point of impact...not to mention all the problems that go with it. It is like spending the money to put mag tires and a flame paint job on a Yugo. Spend the money on ammo and go shooting...or upgrade the scope. All that effort for a non functional suppressor...just for the looks? To each his own but if precision rifle is your interest, you need to put your money aside for ammo, scopes, stocks, components and all those expensive precision toys.
Cool. Why not tape some foliage to the barrel and make it look ghillie.
Seriously...why would you want to put more weight on the barrel, potentially change your point of impact...not to mention all the problems that go with it. It is like spending the money to put mag tires and a flame paint job on a Yugo. Spend the money on ammo and go shooting...or upgrade the scope. All that effort for a non functional suppressor...just for the looks? To each his own but if precision rifle is your interest, you need to put your money aside for ammo, scopes, stocks, components and all those expensive precision toys.
Actually, if you leave significant length on your "fake can" it will act quite nicely as a noise abatement device... not reducing the overall sound level, mind you, but rather directing the blast and flash downrange. Much like the SPEX brake that ATRS puts out (which, by the way, is awesome now that I've had a chance to use mine extensively).
It basically just becomes a "cup" style flash suppressor that may not actually suppress the flash but will direct a fair bit of noise downrange. And it'll have WAY more much metal in it than it actually needs, but that's the look you want so it's your choice to pay the weight penalty.
It doesn't seem like a terrible idea to me, really. Whatever floats your boat!
-M
(Olympic shooters have barrel shrouds for that reason)
/devilsadvocate![]()
looks interesting but not exactly the look im going for.
More weight is a steadier rifle, although the barrel isn't the best place to put it. Perhaps they're shooting iron sights and want their front sight a little farther without getting a longer barrel? (Olympic shooters have barrel shrouds for that reason)
/devilsadvocate![]()
Barrel shroud??? Thats the thing that goes up! Right??![]()
Seriously...why would you want to put more weight on the barrel, potentially change your point of impact...not to mention all the problems that go with it. It is like spending the money to put mag tires and a flame paint job on a Yugo. Spend the money on ammo and go shooting...or upgrade the scope. All that effort for a non functional suppressor...just for the looks? To each his own but if precision rifle is your interest, you need to put your money aside for ammo, scopes, stocks, components and all those expensive precision toys.