"full auto" kit.

Around here, anyway, there are enough Fudds and nosy "responsible citizen" sorts that anything that resembles full auto will get immediate attention from the RCMP. Bump firing included. Even if you could convince the responding officer that what you are doing is legal, is it really worth the hassle? Especially with the cost of ammunition and only 5 and 10 round magazines.
 
Around here, anyway, there are enough Fudds and nosy "responsible citizen" sorts that anything that resembles full auto will get immediate attention from the RCMP. Bump firing included. Even if you could convince the responding officer that what you are doing is legal, is it really worth the hassle? Especially with the cost of ammunition and only 5 and 10 round magazines.

A right not exercised is a right that will be taken away.
When no one exercise or it's not exercise not enough people forget about it. When they forget about it, they think otherwise and eventually laws will change.
My point is if you're willing to by all means go ahead. Kinda works only if you're the lawyer or if you have money for lawyers.
 
With a little bit of knowledge and a few of the right parts, someone could make one of these spring loaded stocks in there own garage. Now that people have scene it done, there will be alot of guys who will come up with there own homeade variations I'm sure. Seems easy enough to shoot, if grandma can do it. The only way that this sort of thing could be banned, would he if bumpfiring was banned and whats next, the weaver stance. Don't see how this sort of thing could be banned.
 
That old lady's laugh is creepy.

More than anything, I would be interested in seeing the RCMP's reasoning if this stock is prohibited (IF they would be so good as to provide an explanation without a court battle).
 
Lmfao^ 3.5seconds as usual?
That sounds about right for a 10 rounder :D

More like 0.5 seconds for a 10 rder. You can shoot off 30 rounds from a C7 on FA in less than 3 seconds.

Anyway, here's an excerpt explaining the stock:

The SSAR-15 is NOT a mechanical device. It does not perform any automatic functions, and it does not increase a rifles rate of fire.

The SSAR-15 is a rifle stock, and the muscular application of force to create forward movement of the firearm defines the will of the shooter to discharge each individual round of ammunition. Each discharge requires a separate decision by the operator to move the firearm back to a firing condition.

With the SSAR-15 installed – the firearm is still dependent on an actively engaged operator at all times; if the operator ceases to apply sufficient effort to move the firearm back to a firing condition; the firearm will immediately cease operating.

From the way that sounds, it should be legal. However some creep (liberal/NDP) or some disgruntled RCMP jerk would see it for how it's look and change the laws accordingly to make it including firearms that "simulate fully automatic function". What if someone could just tap the trigger really quick like and simulate it with their finger? Would the person's finger become a prohibited device leaving them only with their thumb to shoot?

I say ney ney...
 
Criminal code regulations
PART 4


PROHIBITED DEVICES

Former Prohibited Weapons Order, No. 9


1. Any electrical or mechanical device that is designed or adapted to operate the trigger mechanism of a semi-automatic firearm for the purpose of causing the firearm to discharge cartridges in rapid succession.
 
Criminal code regulations
PART 4
PROHIBITED DEVICES
Former Prohibited Weapons Order, No. 9
1. Any electrical or mechanical device that is designed or adapted to operate the trigger mechanism of a semi-automatic firearm for the purpose of causing the firearm to discharge cartridges in rapid succession.

Just read through the Criminal Code firearms regs. Doesn't do anything to the trigger mechanism, so should be legal, so far as I can see... looks like it would just make bumpfiring (which is legal) possible from the shoulder.

...but hey, what do I know...
 
Criminal code regulations
PART 4


PROHIBITED DEVICES

Former Prohibited Weapons Order, No. 9


1. Any electrical or mechanical device that is designed or adapted to operate the trigger mechanism of a semi-automatic firearm for the purpose of causing the firearm to discharge cartridges in rapid succession.

Well, as their discription says, it's NOT a mechanical device. Or electrical, obviously. However it is a firearm part that is, halfway, designed to "discharge cartridges in rapid succession"...

SSAR-15 is sitting on the fence.
 
My interpretation would be... it is legal... provided that it is not determined by the powers that be that the stock qualifies as a mechanical device.
 
Back
Top Bottom