Garmin Xero Chrony

Reading and understanding the accuracy specifications would be a good thing for some people.

A very good point. According to Garmin, for rifles, accuracy is +/- 0.1 %, so for a round going 2750 fps the unit should be within 2.75 fps of actual. As such the decimal at the end has no real significance. It looks like a decent product to me, but other than it's compact size, it doesn't seem like a game changer to me. That said if I was in the market for a new unit, it would be high if not top of the list.
 
Last edited:
A very good point. According to Garmin, for rifles, accuracy is +/- 0.1 %, so for a round going 2750 fps the unit should be within 2.75 fps of actual. As such the decimal at the end has no real significance. It looks like a decent product to me, but other than it's compact size, it doesn't seem like a game changer to me. That said if I was in the market for a new unit, it would be high if not top of the list.

It is absolutely a game changer. For the following reasons:

Can do anything from airsoft to 220 Swift in one package with no add-ons. It does it using a MUCH simpler user interface. It does that in a MUCH more compact unit. It is also easier to position, and is much less susceptible to dropped shots from brakes or other environmental factors.

Labradar got lazy, full stop.
 
It is absolutely a game changer. For the following reasons:

Can do anything from airsoft to 220 Swift in one package with no add-ons. It does it using a MUCH simpler user interface. It does that in a MUCH more compact unit. It is also easier to position, and is much less susceptible to dropped shots from brakes or other environmental factors.

Labradar got lazy, full stop.

From my perspective(don't shoot airsoft or .204 Ruger), to be a game changer, the accuracy would need to be an order of magnitude better, which it isn't. If it had repeatability down to 0.1fps, I'd also be really impressed. I haven't seen anything in the way of specs to suggest that is the case.
 
Accuracy to 1 decimal place is pointless when natural velocity variations, at best, are in the 10-100 fps range. An accuracy of +/- 1 fps is meaningless downrange. Expecting 0.1 fps is downright silly.
 
What’s a bit silly is displaying a decimal place when the level of precision is no where near that level.

Who has proof the level of precision is no where near that level? The tolerance is for error is +/- .1% but that does not mean it is always off by that... Even though that level of precision isn't required practically by us mere mortals but just saying.

It is just like picking up a typical box of say 100 .30cal 180gr. bullets, 97 are 180.0gr. exactly, one is 179.9, and two are 180.1gr. - Should they start labelling the box weight as 179.9 to 180.1gr. weight because it is the manufacturers specified tolerance?
 
Who has proof the level of precision is no where near that level? The tolerance is for error is +/- .1% but that does not mean it is always off by that... Even though that level of precision isn't required practically by us mere mortals but just saying.

It is just like picking up a typical box of say 100 .30cal 180gr. bullets, 97 are 180.0gr. exactly, one is 179.9, and two are 180.1gr. - Should they start labelling the box weight as 179.9 to 180.1gr. weight because it is the manufacturers specified tolerance?

I should have said probably not. My point being a fourth decimal point on a set of callipers doesn’t mean you can measure accurately to that level. They don’t offer any specs on repeatability, maybe with good reason. The new Garmin unit will no doubt dominate the market and Labradar may be the next Blackberry, but game changer? Not for me.
 
I have had my Garmin Xero C1 for almost 2 weeks, taken it on several range trips, both bench and field, and there is no comparison, the Garmin has won hands down. Most significant differences...Garmin is approx 1/14 th the size/weight of the LABRADAR, setup is seconds rather than minutes, and was effortless to use, much simpler menu operation.The Garmin picks up 100% of .22LR rounds down range, even sub 800 fps (LABRADAR is finnicky with .22, required RAT, and even then was marginal), Garmin does not pick up other shooters rounds down range at the local Range. When I got my Garmin it looked approx 70% charged so I used it as was and in the several trips out in temps ranging between +5C and -3C it has gone down to approx 50% charge, have yet to charge it. Garmin seems much less sensitive with regards to orientation, approx 40 degrees grace in right left/up down alignment.
In summary...My LABRADAR is as good as it ever has been, however the Garmin Xero C1 is a superior product. I sold my LABRADAR less than 24 hrs ago for $530 shipped. I sincerely hope that LABRADAR as a corporate entity both survives and answers the call to compete, not just with Garmin...
 
My new chrony arrived.

IMG-2352.jpg


When they said this thing was small, they weren’t kidding!

IMG-2353.jpg


And I just happened to have a nice Pelican 1200 case that I repurposed from a radio case!

IMG_2351.jpg


And a large lithium battery from the old LabRadar to give it some extra juice (if needed). Can’t wait to try it out on Wednesday!
 
Eight months later and I finally got around to picking up a Garmin.

LOL on the guys looking for deals. The price is still exactly the same at $799. I got mine at Cabelas and saved the 5% veteran's discount, which was nice. ;)

Haven't had a chance to use the Garmin yet but man is it tiny compared to my previous conventional type chronographs. I'm REALLY looking forward to not being able to shoot the fricken chronograph and the setup of getting the unit on a tripod and all aligned so I an shoot the target at the same time, was really getting old as well.
 
I just picked one up as well. Took me a while to sell my magneto speed.

I’m also looking at the LabRadar LX just to do a comparison then likely sell the LabRadar 🤣 cause I don’t think it will do anything better than the Garmin for me and I’d like to compare the app alongside each other.

B
 
Used my new Garmin for the first time today. WOW, is it easy to use and reliable. Didn't drop any shots and is super easy to connect to the phone app.

Has anyone figured a way to measure velocities less than the 600 fps pistol range? There are projectiles that run way below 600 fps.
 
Used my new Garmin for the first time today. WOW, is it easy to use and reliable. Didn't drop any shots and is super easy to connect to the phone app.

Has anyone figured a way to measure velocities less than the 600 fps pistol range? There are projectiles that run way below 600 fps.

Shouldn’t be an issue I had a buddy shoot his now with one in the 200s ? Maybe just needs to be in a better spot to see the pistol stuff ?

B
 
Used mine for the first time a few days ago. So simple to use. I’ll be saying goodbye to my Caldwell. I didn’t have a table so I used a camera tripod parked up against the camera tripod I use for a shooting rest. Slick as can be.
 
Back
Top Bottom