redddogg69
CGN Ultra frequent flyer
- Location
- Burlington/ON
That's great, the problem is still the shooter. Shooting a slow fire tiny group at distance is great if you're into shooting tiny slow fire groups at stationary targets. Shoot those same groups while under the clock or other external pressures and now you possess a skill set that impresses. Shooting with top level folks doesn't mean he's learning anything, doesn't mean he's learning proper technique and doesn't mean he's demonstrating proper technique. You can't learn through osmosis. As for his short time with handguns. Some people are fast learners, others not so much. This isn't rocket science, its the fundamentals and there aren't that many to learn, its mastering them that takes time.
A pic of a ragged hole doesn't tell you much. Other variables are unknown and we don't know what the shooter was trying to accomplish. If tiny groups are the goal then most people have the wrong gun for the job as most autos are service pistols with coarse sights and reliability being more important than inherent accuracy.
If the shooter is looking to compete in an action shooting type discipline or defensive training, then a service pistol is more than adequate. I simply don't have any interest in tiny slow fire groups, they're boring and pointless, especially with a service pistol. No one who competes or carries for a living ever shoots for groups, which makes them pointless in the grand scheme of things.
Tdc
So true, when we shoot it is with the emphasis on shooting as fast as we can as accurately as we can, if you can cover your grouping with your hand your doing it right. When we punch tight little groups we get told to shoot faster.


















































