Glock Transfer Rejected

Lol play it off all ya like. You wanted to steal from the guy cause you thought he’s a scumbag who doesn’t deserve his money back. Your sense of balance should have informed you long before you opened this thread that you were atop a very high horse.
 
Sounds like you gouged him on the price to begin with, that speaks to your character, so it's no surprise you don't know what to do in this situation.
 
Zortron said:
Lol play it off all ya like. You wanted to steal from the guy cause you thought he’s a scumbag who doesn’t deserve his money back. Your sense of balance should have informed you long before you opened this thread that you were atop a very high horse.
Click to expand...

Shoot! its like you're in my head and know exactly what i'm thinking, crazy.
 
cmfrd said:
I don't think it's as black and white as everyone calling you a wannabe thief. It's a weird and unprecedented situation. He has incurred a significant opportunity cost. You could've sold that to someone who isn't a ####up, and now you can't, because he attempted to buy it.

I agree that there's no other option than to return the money but I do feel for you.
Click to expand...

Pretty much my first thought on the matter but I will return the money. Thanks Dude.
 
Once you receive the letter from the RCMP - refund all his money - perhaps even email him a scanned copy of the letter. In the end it is the right thing to do in this situation. Merry Christmas
 
If the parameters of the deal were predicated on a "transfer approval" only then thats the deal, no approval = no deal = refund. If you had clearly defined specific details around the transfer "agreement" then maybe you would have reason to keep his funds. But it sounds like a refund is in order as the deal was loosely defined on the "transfer approval" only.

If there is a next time, you can be sure to add language to cover the edge cases, this could help protect both parties.
 
I may not be correct on this but…….if he had said nothing and simply let the rejection letter come through……do they say (or would you have been able to find out) the reason for the rejection? If not then you may have been in the same situation anyway, but simply not knowing the back story. Yes it still would have sucked but you probably wouldn’t have been as upset. I understand why you are but on the positive side he owned “the why” with you. I know that doesn’t do much but honestly and transparency are worth something. Not worth the conflict, step up, and if he is honourable he will probably “do something for you”, but that is on him. These type of things carry risk. All the best!
 
Bummer! I feel for you, I really do. However the right thing to do in this case is to return the funds as you still have the pistol. There are other ways to recoup some of your loss (eg. sellling all but the frame) if that is important to you, which I don't think it is. It is more abouit the missed opportunity due to the buyer's malfeasance and the inconvenience of having to return the funds. It sucks to be you right now, but you will feel good about doing the right thing at Xmas time. I'd feel like the scumbag if I tried to keep some (or all) of the guy's money, but YMMV....
 
Sell the upper and the trigger and the mags if you really don't want it... as long as you retain the lower, you're legal.. The rest could/should bring close to what you paid for it originally without the extra markup, so you're not out anything... personally, I'd keep it, can't replace it afterall
 
Appreciate the constructive replies. I am/was annoyed, his F up is costing me. But I do see the point, just return 100% and have a clean conscience, regardless of the other factors.

Thanks!
 
You mentioned you sold some gadgets and now he doesn't want or need them, that in itself is a no brainer in my opinion and not your problem but as stated unfortunately i feel the same and its crappy you still own the pistol so that part of the purchase is null and void and fully refundable
 
woodlotowner said:
A 'restocking' fee of $50 would be in order for your trouble? There should be no argument with that.
Click to expand...

That was my thoughts as well, you spent lots of time getting the transfer done, and it is his problem , not yours .
But yes the money back, a service fee is reasonable and may smarten the guy up. He maybe needs the money for lawyers.
 
shiftybullet said:
I offered a pistol he bought it. Sounds like you hate capitalism, go cry to Justin for price controls.
Click to expand...

LOL, your character is in question because you don't know the difference between right and wrong.
Capitalism is great, is gouging really capitalism ?
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top Bottom