they got rid of the rear tang that was rather useless anyways, so it appears shorter but has nothing to do with it's working length
believe it or not, I don't own, and have never owned a 455 model, I have a collection of 452's and the barrel change idea never appealed to me so I had no reason to own one, it will however be a staple feature of the new 457 series
^this is the reason I haven't looked at new CZs since they stopped making 452s. The 457s look beautiful and I'm keeping an open mind...but when CZ wants to start threading barrels into their receivers again, they'll have my attention.
If the 455 was less accurate than the 452. Wouldn't putting a 455 barrel on your new 457 on it make less accurate than a 452? Or is the barrel the same on all three models?
Nice rifle - except for the ugly engraving on the stock. I guess I'll struggle along with my 6 455's.![]()
I thought about getting a t1x but after realizing just how much plastic was on that rifle ( my God even the thread protector is plastic) I quickly realized the cost of relacing the palstic with wood and metal would almost double the cost of the rifle. Then I seen this CZ 457 MTR and now I realy want one. I guess I will have to waite untill they hit the market here in Canada and find one so I can have a hands on look at it. So if it looks good and the price is around a G note I may just pick one up.
![]()
but did i mention the real rubber recoil pad and metal thread protector????
yeah I agree, it's nothing special in the CZ world but compared to the new Tikka.......Tikka has a long ways to go to match the competition
If I wanted a Rifle with a wood stock I would have bought a Cooper. Maybe even an Anschutz.
If I wanted a Rifle with a wood stock I would have bought a Cooper. Maybe even an Anschutz.