The main differences; push pin take down, non slanted magwell, forward assist option, normal trigger pocket.... properly anodized![]()
This sums it up !
The main differences; push pin take down, non slanted magwell, forward assist option, normal trigger pocket.... properly anodized![]()
So the base model with proprietary parts is just over $1000 more than the "base" stag 10. Got it.
$1400 more
Stag = $1950, MH = $3350
Match grade parts aren't all they're cracked up to be and they can be replaced at any time. The Stag uses .308 pistol mags as well.
So the base model with proprietary parts is just over $1000 more than the "base" stag 10. Got it.
I agree to most , but , my Stag will come in cheaper than the MH.My MH in 6.5 feeds just fine from 308 XCR-M pistol mags
The base model for $1000 more comes with a match grade stainless barrel and a Timney trigger. I'm not knocking the Stag, I've owned Stag AR's before and they make great rifles but if you're going to compare prices try to compare rifles with similar equipment. Add a quality stainless barrel and a quality trigger to the Stag and the prices are not far off.
If the Stag uses a forged receiver then you've got another cost to overcome comparing it to the ATRS product.
They're all great products but there are reasons some cost more than others and it isn't a non restricted tax and it isn't us being bent over the table because there are no choices. We don't need these rifles, they're simply toys that we like, if you don't like the price or the manufacturer of one then don't buy that rifle.
I agree to most , but , my Stag will come in cheaper than the MH.
Stag 10 Set $570
Geiselle National match $340
Christensen Arms CFW match barrel $750
MI 15 inch hand guard $340
CTR /Buffer/spring/ tube $150
Brownells light weight BCG $550
$2700 +\_ a few.
I did catch a couple of deals, but still under $3000.
True, but what have I missed? Besides Charging Handle.Yeah, but your rifle isn't complete with that list nor will it have the same features list as a basic MH. It also wont have billit recievers, and it also won't be assembled and warrantied by a professional shop. All consideration one must remember.
True, but what have I missed? Besides Charging Handle.
Building them isn’t that difficult.
I give ya the warranty and billet??
I also get that ATRS is a much smaller company than stag and has the disadvantage of dealing in Canada.
True, but what have I missed? Besides Charging Handle.
Building them isn’t that difficult.
I give ya the warranty and billet??
I also get that ATRS is a much smaller company than stag and has the disadvantage of dealing in Canada.
Still wont have the ambi bolt release either which is my favorite feature the MH has over other designs.
Assembly is not a big deal but lots of folks dont have the time or know how, and it requires additional expense in the form of tools.
Push pins make no difference to performance or reliability.
Slanted mag well makes no difference to performance or reliability.
Forward assist is a stupid idea and anyone with a hint of knowledge knows better than to use it.
Trigger pocket accepts milspec triggers. Yes, the trigger packs won't work, get over it. Geissele is the gold standard in aftermarket triggers and theirs fit.
The anodizing is correct and is being done by some vendors as well. Choose wisely.
Small parts kits for upper and lower
Does the barrel come with gas block and tube?
Bolt lapped?
You're right, assembly is easy but having it professionally assembled and hand fit is a nice touch.
Of course a similar rifle that should perform just as well can be built for cheaper, but it will always be worth less on resale with a forged receiver set and being a Franken AR. Most of us already know from experience, a factory built rifle is easier to sell and holds more value than a Franken rifle no matter how nice the parts are.
I'm looking forward to seeing some of these builds, I will have to be strong and resist the temptation to buy the Stag set.
My next purchase will be the ATRS varmint sized receiver set since I have all the parts needed sitting here.
Yes, I like the ambi bolt release as well.
Looking for a NR AR type rifle. I haven't seen very many options. Can you fine people help me out please?
And for that price difference you get billet reciever sets, an integrated ambi bolt release, a side charging handle, match barrel and Timney trigger, as well as a local shop that will look after you.
So in reality, if those proprietary features and not so basic "basic" parts are of interest to you, the price for the MH is appropriate.
My MH in 6.5 feeds just fine from 308 XCR-M pistol mags
The base model for $1000 more comes with a match grade stainless barrel and a Timney trigger. I'm not knocking the Stag, I've owned Stag AR's before and they make great rifles but if you're going to compare prices try to compare rifles with similar equipment. Add a quality stainless barrel and a quality trigger to the Stag and the prices are not far off.
If the Stag uses a forged receiver then you've got another cost to overcome comparing it to the ATRS product.
They're all great products but there are reasons some cost more than others and it isn't a non restricted tax and it isn't us being bent over the table because there are no choices. We don't need these rifles, they're simply toys that we like, if you don't like the price or the manufacturer of one then don't buy that rifle.
I agree to most , but , my Stag will come in cheaper than the MH.
Stag 10 Set $570
Geiselle National match $340
Christensen Arms CFW match barrel $750
MI 15 inch hand guard $340
CTR /Buffer/spring/ tube $150
Brownells light weight BCG $550
Raptor CH. $120
$2800+\_ a few.
I did catch a couple of deals, but still under $3000.
Yeah, but your rifle isn't complete with that list nor will it have the same features list as a basic MH. It also wont have billit recievers, and it also won't be assembled and warrantied by a professional shop. All consideration one must remember.
CH is a big one, but in addition to that it still seems your missing a gas system, LPK and a few small upper bits.
Still wont have the ambi bolt release either which is my favorite feature the MH has over other designs.
Assembly is not a big deal but lots of folks dont have the time or know how, and it requires additional expense in the form of tools.
I didn’t say it was better, literally just listed the differences. About my last point, the first receivers had anodizing issues, I made a joke. Lighten up, I’m here for information and fun lol.
I like the ATRS offering, and you’re okay with what the SLR offers. I like to think I’m funny, always take that into consideration when reading my replies![]()
Not much point in discussing differences that make no difference.
They do make a difference to some people. Why cant you just accept that ? This is the cool part about this hobby! not everyone wants the same looking rifle as the next guy.
But saying the SLR is almost an AR is laughable.
Not much point in discussing differences that make no difference. The first runs of SLR receivers had minor issues with the anodizing and the option to wait for corrected ones was given. Offering your false narrative doesn't help those who aren't up to speed on the situation, it's simply false information. If you're here for information would you not prefer that information to be factual or are you just a connoisseur of all info??



























