The good news is for $100 and a trip to the smith you'll have a heck of a rifle. With a Savage a $1000 won't give you anything more than a Savage.
Thought it worthy of mention again.
The good news is for $100 and a trip to the smith you'll have a heck of a rifle. With a Savage a $1000 won't give you anything more than a Savage.
uh huh, what magic can be performed for $100 that would turn this into a "heck of a rifle"?
All my precision rigs are remingtons......none cost $100 to turn into a heck of a rifle....I wish that was the case.
Not knocking remington, I love my 700's but lets not get carried away.
Nice guns..very very nice..
A Savage, for any money, can't come close. Especially with the top one.![]()
LMAO![]()
why waste my time you apparently know everything......
That's about your only angle. Good move.
does Remington pay you royalties for being such a nut hugger?
I got a 700SPS and it aint anything special my friend by the time I add a trigger and action job to make it as nice as my Savage I will be well over your claimed $100 a trigger is $150 by its self....But heck my Savage came with a slick trigger and a butter smooth action and it didn't cost me a dime more then the purchase price of the rifle which was also lower then my 700SPS.
So the question is if you have to spend money on a Remington to make it as nice as a Savage to shoot and your already paying more for the Remington to begin why even bother with the Remington?....I see ZERO advantages to the Remington's over the Savage's in factory form and everything you can do to a Rem you can do to a Savage for cheaper....
My box stock bvss puts 5rnds in 5/8" at 200yds your telling me if I bought the 700 Varmint SF it would shoot better?....I beg to differ....maybe after a new trigger, stock, action work and a barrel it might but why waste the time and money when you can get the same effect for 1/2 the cost from Savage.
I don't get cought up in the which make is better crap I own them all but in this case I prefer my Savage over the Remington heck my SS Weatherby Vanguard is a nicer rifle them my 700sps. I test drove them all a few weeks back when I bought my .22-250 and if the Remington was the better rifle it would be sitting in my locker.
What is funny about all this is that the TOP rifle you barfed all over isn't even a Remington. I'll address the other nonsense later.![]()
Oh I know the top one isnt a rem I see the bolt and the bottom two look to have much more then $100 in work done to them both look to be sporting match barrels.
To clarify I wasn't barfing on your rifles as they are all very nice looking rifles I was barfing on your statement that implies no savage compairs to your mighty Remingtons which is laughable....So just throwing it out there how my stock Savage preforms beaverfur can confirm he was at the range with me last week 5 shots 5/8" 200yds how do your stock rem's shoot?........how is that nonsense? my Old Stock Savage Predator shot 1/2 MOA as well pics of the range and targets are up here somewhere....
Whats nonsense is buying a new rifle just to have to throw money at it to get it to function properly like Remington owners seem happy to do....
Wow how the hell did this go from a problem with a SPS to a Remington VS Savage thread
Its the same BS over and over no different then Ford vs Chevy
The good news is for $100 and a trip to the smith you'll have a heck of a rifle. With a Savage a $1000 won't give you anything more than a Savage
A Savage, for any money, can't come close. Especially with the top one.![]()
Ihe's all over every thread turning it into a rem vs sav match every chance he gets.