Then by your logic are all .40 magazines that aren't clearly marked for .40S&W also prohibited devices?
see this is where the product gets sold for me. you are right, as far as I can see. most mags are marked .40cal only...
Then by your logic are all .40 magazines that aren't clearly marked for .40S&W also prohibited devices?
I don't see what all you naysayers are whining about.
Well, it wasn't presented to them on a silver spoon from the government & the RCMP didn't do any thinking for them. I assume that is what the whining is about - a lack of government involvement in the firearms industry.
Those magazines are proprietary to a specific firearm that is chambered in .40 S&W. The manufacturer decided to label their proprietary magazines by the general calibre by design. The big difference from this magazine and those factory ones is that the OEM magazines come with the gun and are labelled as such. What firearm is this magazine designed for? What calibre is that firearm? To date I'm not aware of a generic ".50 Calibre" naming convention for any firearm.Then by your logic are all .40 magazines that aren't clearly marked for .40S&W also prohibited devices?
All I'm saying is that it's risky buying into things that that can be easily interpreted by law enforcement as illegal.
Pinned mags have gone through the proper channels and came out as an RCMP approved magazine.
There would need to a 50 cal pistol first, then a 10 round 50 cal mag could be reviewed and possibly approved.
So when buddy pins his long lost and recently found ak magazine to 5rds so the rcmp doesn't bust down the door and start cracking skulls, is actually still at risk until he takes that magazine to the rcmp to have it properly verified as a pinned magazine with the RCMP's stamp of approval?
The very fact that the mfr went under the RCMPs noses to avoid having to get them approved like pinned mags is concerning because the RCMP do not know about them.
Go to court for what? Police failing to understand the law? The old maxim "failure to understand the law is no excuse" doesn't just apply to us. I get that court is costly and the crown has unlimited assets to make someone's life hell, but these mags aren't groundbreaking stuff, there are plenty examples already in circulation with no issue and even special bulletin 72 from the RCMP themselves.
Mags are not subject to approval by the RCMP. The firearms act just says mags designed for use in a semiauto center fire rifle must only be able to accept 5 rounds and mags designed for use in a handgun must only be able to accept 10 rounds.
May I ask how they went under the RCMPs noses?
Mags are not subject to approval by the RCMP. The firearms act just says mags designed for use in a semiauto center fire rifle must only be able to accept 5 rounds and mags designed for use in a handgun must only be able to accept 10 rounds.
You don't require approval from the government to have pinned magazines, to produce them or even to import them (CBSA will say otherwise, but there's no law saying you must). But you cannot have prohibited magazines without the proper licence. These over capacity magazines in particular appear to carry greater risk of being declared prohibited devices.Thought processes are really running low tonight. Pinned mags require RCMP approval. TrevorF stated these don't need any RCMP involvement because they are mfr'd to only hold 5 RDS.
You are correct. But which specific centrefire firearm were these magazines designed for?



























