GSG-16 Clarification of NR Status

Status
Not open for further replies.
For all you know he could have been a ####? Youza specifically stated "I had remained polite and calm throughout the call."

Well you got me, it's on the Internet so it must be true... I mean, shame on me for thinking someone might possibly tell lies or have a different recollection of events...

I'm just asking for proof of what he's claiming is all. If the recording is as he claims, then that's pretty much a nail in the coffin. Forgive me for not wanting to take someone's word over actual indisputable proof.
 
I called them this morning as well (they must have been getting a few calls) lol. It was around 9am their time. They said they had a big shipment in and they were gonna come on the board to explain when their done. I know they are probably busy but I am a business owner as well and if something like this was happening with my business along with getting calls from various people telling me about this which could ruin potential business I would be right on it with an explination. Still waiting for a response.....
 
The thing with situation like this is, they dont just come out of nowhere. If IRG fabricated this all up, then yeah whats up IRG? Here is the big BUT, IRG have better things to do then to do a malicious attack. So this definitely dont look good on bls.
 
Well you got me, it's on the Internet so it must be true... I mean, shame on me for thinking someone might possibly tell lies or have a different recollection of events...

I'm just asking for proof of what he's claiming is all. If the recording is as he claims, then that's pretty much a nail in the coffin. Forgive me for not wanting to take someone's word over actual indisputable proof.

Lol dude. I hear what youre saying but come on. If i hadnt myself told you I had recorded the call, you wouldnt even be asking for it. So ask yourself if in the situation I have ANY interest in lying and put my ownself in the spotlight without the actual recording I claim to have, after breaking down the details of the call...

I'll upload when I have time.i record all my calls.

Youza.
 
A lot of finger pointing without proof...like always hold judgement till as many facts as possible are in.

First off I would want proof in the first sentence stated....

We were notified on Oct 8th by the RCMP that another company that imports the GSG-16 had reached out to the BC CFO and inquired about prohibiting the ATI GSG-16.

Maybe that's the biggest lie that everyone is missing. RCMP states allegedly "another company that imports the GSG-16 had reached out to the BC CFO".

Prove it... Wouldn't be the first time the RCMP had stated something without proof.

How do we know the RCMP even got a call in the first place or was it from a Libtard wanna be.

Just trying to divide the ranks...(which I must say he did pdw!)


Just read Post 94....as Roseanne Roseannadanna would say....Never mind....
 
Last edited:
Well Bl dont come out to defend their self if this is true or false ...

Some call us drama queen,but we dont need another TSE,we need to stand together we have enought to fight our own gouvernment and anti guns group we certainly dont need this again.
 
Lol dude. I hear what youre saying but come on. If i hadnt myself told you I had recorded the call, you wouldnt even be asking for it. So ask yourself if in the situation I have ANY interest in lying and put my ownself in the spotlight without the actual recording I claim to have, after breaking down the details of the call...

I'll upload when I have time.i record all my calls.

Youza.

If you said you didn't record the call then I would only take your words with a grain of salt, as I am now until I hear the recording. Again, not calling you a liar or anything. In in my eyes, it's in the same vein as those whose post rants in dealers' subforum. You could be 100% correct but it's impossible for anyone else to know without anything backing it up (some sort of record, a reply from the other party, etc). As I said, if it's as you claim then it certainly doesn't look good for Blueline. But until there is something to back it up, then it's hard to form a proper opinion other than "more information is needed".
 
It may explain the wait for the Canadian model. Or was the accused just contacting the RCMP to see if they would be prohibited depending on the election results?
I read that they were inquiring about prohibiting the ati gsg16 which is the American version imported by irunguns as far as I can tell. Therefore it has nothing to do with the election
 
Can we get blame for over-reacting ? i think not,just look at the first post of BL when the rifle went NR,they act like victim and beging to use the word of Grey market to identified IRG.
 
IRG. I read your OP Immediately after you posted it. Now I've just read BL's response. You look kind of foolish (maybe?). How do you respond? What are we all missing here? You started it! Lol
 
Long story short the ATI GSG16 was a prohib, BL got a call from the RCMP asking why they were importing prohib rifles, BL shows the RCMP the FRT they worked to get approved and then the RCMP reclassifies the ATI version to NR. Seems like BL saved IRG from a lot of trouble.

The adult thing to do would have been for IRG to give BL a call to clarify the situation before starting this thread.
 
Long story short the ATI GSG16 was a prohib, BL got a call from the RCMP asking why they were importing prohib rifles, BL shows the RCMP the FRT they worked to get approved and then the RCMP reclassifies the ATI version to NR. Seems like BL saved IRG from a lot of trouble.

This is the TL;DR for the less than 24 hours this was a problem.

IRG would be in a mountain of trouble if they didn't have the ATI version reclassified.
 
Well you got me, it's on the Internet so it must be true... I mean, shame on me for thinking someone might possibly tell lies or have a different recollection of events...

I'm just asking for proof of what he's claiming is all. If the recording is as he claims, then that's pretty much a nail in the coffin. Forgive me for not wanting to take someone's word over actual indisputable proof.

Hey man call BLS yourself if your so keen on evidence.
 
Wonder how a bunch of prohib rifles slipped by CBSA when they were imported?

Could have easily with the GSG/GSG being NR and the ATI/GSG being prohib, it's a bit confusing. IRG was probably under the impression their rifle would fall under the new FRT when in fact the ATI/GSG was still a prohib.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Back
Top Bottom