Guide Outfitters Association

LEH should increase odds of success based on Postal Code. 1.4 Million people live from Horseshoe Bay to Hope, compared to 10-20 K for many interior towns. The result is that the majority of LEH draws go to people from hundreds of km away.

The government relies on hunters losing focus on the real issue and fighting among themselves over the remaining scraps. We will eventually eat all the scraps..................
 
As long as there are people willing to commercialize a public owned resource like wildlife, there will be folks willing to figure a way to exploit it. And a group of maggots to pick the bones.
 
Don't forget that in BC, you are at reduced odds for three years after a successful LEH draw, so while people are not weighed in favour when not drawn, those that are drawn do have the odds reduced for three years. If doing a group or shared hunt, all applicants move to the lowest odds of an individual .. in other words, three people in a group or shared hunt, two have never been drawn, one just got a draw within the last three years, the entire group is at the reduced odds of the one that was previously drawn.

The thing about the LEH system in BC is that it is very much "luck of the draw" and as you know, some people are very lucky and some people are very unlucky ..... but the odds are stated and it's your choice as to what hunt you want to enter for. Never get drawn? , have an honest look at the odds for that hunt, maybe it's time to pick a different one ... It's human nature (but zero logic) to "feel" you should have better odds than someone else because you haven't been drawn in 10 years .. your odds are what ever is listed when you enter that LEH selection (unless you're at reduced odds due to being drawn previously...). But let's not let this thread slip into an LEH debate, it is what it is and our problems are not due to LEH, they are squarely with the Gov and how they handle game management and splitting the scraps between residents and GO's after FN's FSC hunts.
 
Last edited:
This is a disgusting case of lobbyists and campaign "contributions"

They are literally selling up to 40% of our game to the highest foreign bidder.
 
I couldn't disagree more, this is not the way to improve hunting opportunity. Equal access and the same odds for all residents applying for LEH, the odds are listed when you look at the LEH synopsis, make your choice and live with it. Trying to weigh LEH odds in favour of "local to the area" hunters is just wrong in my opinion and will only lead to people cheating about their address and it would be a nightmare to maintain the list of who lives where as people move and addresses change. I understand the feeling of smaller community hunters being over run by "out of towners" due to the shear number of LEH entries from the populated areas .. we all know what it feels like, similar to a degree for Westerners having lived under Liberal Rule from back East for so long ...but this is divisive and not good for the hunting community as a whole (JMO).

Being that i am one of the 1.4 million and you live in a town of about 30 K i find this odd. My point is that the people from the city will get the lions share of the draws and the locals will end up having resentment and a greater possibility of poaching. A belief that, that Moose might just as well be shot by the local as left for the out of towner. The entire LEH became necessary for Moose because much of the Cariboo was much closer to major centers than say the Omineca or Peace. Some South Province FSR needed traffic lights 15 years ago during the two week general Moose season. Any Bull that stepped on a road for two weeks died. Much simpler to travel one day and one tank of fuel than go to the Peace which is three times further and three times the fuel bill.

Recently, the government has also started Doe draws. IMO this should happen only in areas with a high number of vehicle vs wildlife crashes. A managed percentage of bucks and bulls should not influence populations, killing does and cows can. It is simply greed by the government, extra tag dollars going to general revenue.
 
Rather than argue about which postal code shoukd get the LEH, let's focus on ensuring that more LEH is allocated to residents, not given to outfitters to sell.

Fighting over scraps, indeed.
 
Maybe we as hunters should lobby against the " Outfitting of Wild Animals" being that most of us support wild game projects and Outfitters tend to use it for Financial gains !

I always thought I'd use a outfitter up North so I could go on a dream hunt, but when they are doing stuff like this, it makes us real resident hunters very angry. And maybe its time for us to lobby and get their tags reduced by a lot
 
It is time to lobby and get it reduced. They pushed too hard, for too much.

This is what has been adopted as POLICY right now. It's not legislated yet, still time to change it. Does this seem fair? 230ish outfitters controlling this large a percentage compared to what 102 000 residents get?

Turn up the heat guys. Contact your MLA's. Tell them you VOTE and will do what you can to put them out of office if this goes through. CC the Premier and the Minister, but most importantly put pressure on your MLA- Lib or NDP. Get the opposition doing it's job.



REGION SPECIES RESIDENT
% SPLIT
INDUSTRY
% SPLIT
1 Bull Elk 80 20
1 Either ### Elk 80 20
1 Grizzly Bear 60 40
2 Bull Elk 80 20
3 Mountain Goat 65 35
3 Grizzly Bear 60 40
3 Moose 80 20
3 Big Horn Sheep 70 30
4 Big Horn Sheep GOS GOS
4 Mountain Goat 65 35
4 Grizzly Bear 60 40
4 Bull Moose 80 20
5 Moose 75 25
5 Bull Caribou 75 25
5 Grizzly Bear 60 40
5 Mountain Goat 65 35
6 North Thin Horn Sheep 60 40
6 South Moose 75 25
6 North Moose 75 25
6 South Mountain Goat 65 35
6 North Mountain Goat 65 35
6 North Caribou 75 25
6 South Grizzly Bear 60 40
6 North Grizzly Bear 60 40
7 A Bull Moose 75 25
7 A Grizzly Bear 60 40
7 B Mountain Goat 65 35
7 B Antlerless Elk 98 2
7 B Grizzly Bear 60 40
7 B Bison 80 20
8 Bull Moose 80 20
8 Big Horn Sheep 70 30
8 Mountain Goat 65 35
8 Grizzly Bear 60 40

They are selling out resident hunters in exchange for outfitter donations:

bbca929f-70c8-4df6-94ff-3e471eeb4620.png
 
Keep in mind the GUIDE has all fall to hunt, and will over book to cover for failed early hunts so naturally their success rate is higher than the resident hunters. This becomes one of their prime arguments, if residents are not taking their quota then that should be turned over to the guides, (BULLSH!T)!
 
Keep in mind the GUIDE has all fall to hunt, and will over book to cover for failed early hunts so naturally their success rate is higher than the resident hunters. This becomes one of their prime arguments, if residents are not taking their quota then that should be turned over to the guides, (BULLSH!T)!

That's correct to a point .. but as Residents are harvesting very close to their allocation, we're knocking down as many as we are allowed. Even if we weren't, it wouldn't be an immediate transfer to the GO's. First the MOE would look at factors around why the residents aren't harvesting enough of their allocation and then make changes to address that (ease up on access restrictions, lengthen the season, etc.) and if and only if after three years of grossly under harvesting our quota would that un-harvested portion then move over to the GO's allocation. This is likely to never happen. This scenario works both ways, if the GO's don't harvest their allocation and changes have been made to 'help" them, then it transfers to the resident allocation, pretty fair really (jmo).
 
Last edited:
Just seen on FACEBOOK that the B.C. Guide Outfitters Association is lobbying the government to "sharply reduce the amount of game taken by the public."
Anybody got a bead on this?
:mad::mad::mad:
"

I'm just wondering why this thread has such an uninformative title considering the subject?
 
There will be an emergency town hall meeting of BCWF Region 2 next week
Wednesday Dec 17th, @ 7 PM in Langley Sandman Signature Hotel

8855 202nd St
Langley BC
V1M 2N9
Phone 604 888 7263

Meeting is regarding, you guessed it, Wildlife Allocation Policy.
President of Region 2 and Jesse Zeman will be there will be answering any questions.

Everyone is invited.
It's an open meeting.

Hope to see y'all there!

http://www.huntingbc.ca/forum/showthread.php?112890-BCWF-Region-2-emergency-meeting
 
As a commentator pointed out, why not just auction the licenses allocated for foreign hunters to the hunters directly? It's fair, simple, direct and produces the most revenue for the taxpayer.

Once the hunter has won the auction for the license, they can choose whichever guide/outfitter they wish to use - or none at all.

It's not like there are not already existing auction venues, both private and governmental.
 
Back
Top Bottom