Walksalot, I messed wiht your post a bit to make a point. The same arguents have been made regarding bows, and We allow people wiht bows to hunt, and anyone that wants to be sucessful quickly learns that he must practice and beocme proficient. No difference to a handgun.
Have you considered that maybe it's you that's not average? There are lots of folks at my range who are a lot better shots with a handgun than me.
Nice stuff Foxer but why do we allow people to hunt with a bow?
Salty said:Foxer. Who are you at arguement with here in the last pile of pages other than everyone? Or is it just me?![]()
Its a drag that we seem left with those that would support hand gun hunting in this thread, and now we're argueing over ridiculous and frivolous details with, sorry, it seems just you.![]()
Gatehouse said:I've been checking out alaskas handgun hunting regulations. They seem perfect.![]()
Salty said:Care to give the Coles notes version??![]()
Gatehouse said:They don't appear to have any.
I mean, it's legal to hunt wiht a handgun, but the let peopel choose what works best for them.
There are restrictions on ML (over 45 cal) and Bows (weigth of draw/size of arrow) but noting I coudl see abut handguns.![]()
Gatehouse said:They don't appear to have any.
I mean, it's legal to hunt wiht a handgun, but the let peopel choose what works best for them.
There are restrictions on ML (over 45 cal) and Bows (weigth of draw/size of arrow) but noting I coudl see abut handguns.![]()
chambers only a straight wall cartridge,not originally developed for rifles.
Salty said:Interesting. So that precludes most of the Savage and TC bolt action pistols. They normally shoot bottle neck rifle type cartridges. Montana honours its traditional hand gun hunting only it seems...
Gatehouse said:Walksalot, I messed wiht your post a bit to make a point. The same arguents have been made regarding bows, and We allow people wiht bows to hunt, and anyone that wants to be sucessful quickly learns that he must practice and beocme proficient. No difference to a handgun.
The reallity of the situation would be that wanting and having are two different things. I would venture to say if handguns were legislated legal the majority would mess with them for the first while and then they would be left at home. I don't think most would do the practice required to become and remain proficient with a handgun. Hunters should be spending time becoming and remaing proficient with a rifle leave alone a handgun.
.
Tell us aboutthe negative publicity? Why woudl it make a difference?
The law enforcement community would be against people carrying hand guns and the media would suck it up through a flavour straw. It would do far more harm than good to our sport
The government isn't "arming" anyone. We woudl buy our own guns![]()
True that, bad choice of words.
What do border guards have to do wiht this? They are in the public every day, we are talking about going outin the bush and hunting wiht a handgun- 2 very different things.
Here we are talking about hunting with handguns and the people guarding our borders don't have them. It would be lidicrous of the government to let hunters carry handguns in the bush and let people guarding our borders go without. The net, net is you will walk on the frozen ceiling of hell bofore hunters will legally carry handguns hunting.




























