From your quip, I deduce that you are not '...a Trump supporter...' so let me ask you this:
Do you believe that a constitution should be subject to constant subjective interperative revision based upon contemporary preferences or practices, or do you believe that a constitution should be regarded as the final word on the matter, and that a constitution should be interpreted only by it's actual words and the original intent of it's writers (rather than a subjective interperative renovation based primarily upon the personal preferences of the respective members of the court)? Do you know President Trump's record with respect to judicial appointments, and the effect of his appointments upon the American courts? For you, is it all about personality? Isn't policy - with actual deeds, and not simply words - more important than personality?