Henry US Survival Rifle Full Review with Range Report

mmatt

CGN Ultra frequent flyer
Rating - 100%
68   0   0
I've always wanted one of these little rifles. They look cool, they're compact, they float - what's not to like? Well, if you look up and read what others on the internet have to say about them, you'd soon be dissapointed. They're known to be of poor quality, inaccurate and have reliability issues. Well I'm not going to lie, most of the reviews are spot on. But don't give up hope yet, there's still a bit of light at the end of the tunnel. :)

The rifle comes from the factory equipped with a plastic, over-sized stock as seen at the bottom of the following picture:

46525_467443210198_509315198_7037207_4698627_n.jpg


We'll get to the custom made stock in a little bit, but suffice it to say, I was going for function, not form. :redface:

All the components of the rifle fit in the factory plastic stock for a nice compact package - that floats! Yeah, I thought that was pretty cool too. Now I won't worry so much when I'm out kayaking or canoeing. :cool:

The receiver is simplicity itself. Made up of only twenty-eight - yup, you read that right, 28 - individual parts including springs, washers and screws. Here is how it breaks down:

47879_467443795198_509315198_7037224_2765556_n.jpg


Remove the cocking pin and the bolt slides out the front:

47879_467443805198_509315198_7037225_8136741_n.jpg


Flip it over, remove one screw and the internals are revealed:

47879_467443810198_509315198_7037226_620240_n.jpg


Assemble in reverse order.

The barrel has an indexing pin on the top that fits into a slot on the receiver to ensure that you put it on the right way. It really is fool proof:

46525_467443250198_509315198_7037215_528960_n.jpg


Here's a shot of the breach end:

46525_467443245198_509315198_7037214_2506744_n.jpg


Notice the chamfering on the bottom. (left side of the pic) This is a common modification that is done to earlier models of this gun to help prevent loading malfunctions. I was pleasantly surprised to find that it now comes this way from the factory. The barrel is comprised of a very thin steel tube that contains the rifling, what appears to me as an aluminum piece that mates with the receiver and a polymer covering. It's very light which is great if you're carrying it all day through the woods, but I get the feeling that this is not a barrel that you'd want to just toss around.

Here's the muzzle: (sorry about the cat - he was sleeping)

47092_467441840198_509315198_7037158_5838174_n.jpg


The front sight is windage adjustable by sliding the blaze orange blade sight right or left. The rear sight is elevation adjustable by loosening a screw and sliding it up or down.

46525_467443240198_509315198_7037213_2258162_n.jpg


The sights work quite well as all peep sights do. I won't get into how accurate it is or isn't right now but I will say that I shot better groups at 50 yards with the sight then I did with the scope - although that may have had something to do with the fact that it was really hard to get a comfortable cheek weld with the scope installed.

The magazines hold 8 rounds each and look to be well constructed. I hear that the larger capacity mags that are available for ArmaLite's and Charter Arm's AR-7s will not work in this model. :( Too bad really as a 15 or 30 round mag would be a lot of fun.

47879_467443815198_509315198_7037227_5300488_n.jpg


So that's a brief overview of the rifle itself. As I mentioned earlier, it comes with an oversized plastic stock that keep the rifle afloat if you drop it overboard. The downside to this is that in order to keep it floating, the stock needs to be quite large. Being as large as it is, I find it quite uncomfortable to shoot. I have to crane my neck over just to see the sights properly. Not good. I initially thought that I'd pick up a kit from ar-7.com

part102.JPG


but they do not ship to Canada. :( So I hit the workshop one weekend and after scrounging around in the "leftover paintball gun parts" bin, I found a collapsing t-stock, adapter and a set of grips. I fabricated the pistol grip itself out of a chunk of maple (I think) that I had laying around from an old bed post and then put it all together. It's not too pretty, but it works and it's quite solid.

46525_467443215198_509315198_7037208_1714873_n.jpg


As you can see, the t-stock screws into the end of an adapter that is screwed directly into the pistol grip. With the t-stock removed, it measures 24 inches or 610 mm. Just 50 mm short of being allowed to use it with the t-stock removed. That being said, I used red loctite to semi-permanently affix it in position so there won't be any trouble out in the bush if I meet up with a Conservation Officer. With the t-stock set to a LOP of 14", the overall length if the rifle is 33.25". Completely collapsed, it is 32" long. (That's about the same length as my 10/22 which also has a 16" barrel.) Completely collapsing the t-stock, removing the barrel and placing the two parts side by side gives me an overall length of 17.5" which is plenty short enough to stow just about anywhere.

46525_467443230198_509315198_7037211_168777_n.jpg


So let's get into the range report. Like all .22s, this one likes and dislikes different types of ammo. I didn't do extensive testing with dozens of different types, the stuff I can find locally, mostly bulk pack stuff. The ammo I tested was:

Winchester DynaPoints
Winchester Xperts
Winchester 333
CCI Standard Velocity
CCI Sub Sonic
CCI Velocitors
CCI Stingers
CCI Blazers (both bulk pack and standard packaging - yes, there is a difference)

When I first got the rifle, only the Blazers, Stingers and Velocitors worked with no malfunctions. All the others either lacked the power to cycle the action properly or they got hung up to to their large hollowpoints. This is too bad as the Winchester 333 ammo is the cheapest stuff around here and I love to shoot cheap ammo. :D

So I hit the internet to see if there was anything I could do to modify the rifle to be able to shoot a larger diversity of ammo. The first tip I found was to remove one of the recoil springs. I think this is a mod that may work in the ArmaLite and Charter Arms AR-7s, but it does not in the Henry. It ejected the shells just fine, but often lacked the spring power to fully seat the next round in the chamber.

Then I caught a tid-bit of info that mentioned something about cutting the length of the recoil springs. It didn't give any specifics about how much to cut so I figured I'd start off small and work my way up. I started by cutting exactly 2 coils off each spring. Well wouldn't you know - I have only had three feeding and extracting malfunctions since, and we're talking thousands of rounds of ammo. The rifle will now shoot all the ammo in the above list with virtually no problems. A quick demonstration for you:

[youtube]k_Tl_QXzAco[/youtube]
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=k_Tl_QXzAco

So that brings us to accuracy. Just because the gun will cycle all of the above ammo, does not mean it will send it down range with any degree of accuracy. In fact, the only ammo that it really liked was the CCI Blazers in the standard packaging. I got groups of just under 1.5" at 50 yards using the peep sights. Group sizes were slightly better with the scope if I concentrated really hard, but it was impossible to get a good cheek weld. The bulk pack Blazers printed closer to 6" at 50 yards. I have no idea why they would turn out two different rounds with the same name, but they did. Stingers were the other big disappointment with shotgun like patterns. All the others did OK, hovering around the 2" mark, but the real winner here is the 50 round box of CCI Blazers.

So that, in a (very large) nutshell is a quick review on the Henry US Survival Rifle. Overall, I give it about a 7 out of 10. It's light, easy to break down and pack, unique, and (after mods anyway) quite reliable. It suffers a bit in the accuracy department, but as long as you limit your plinking or game taking to 50 yards or less, you'll be fine. The other thing I'd like to see changed is the barrel. having a plastic shrouded barrel is a great idea for weight savings, but lousy for durability. Even a steel barrel encased in aluminum would be better. At least then you could have a real front sight ramp screwed in place instead of a plastic one molded right in.

So I hope you found this review useful or helpful and as a reward for reading it all the way to the end, here are a few more pictures:

46525_467443235198_509315198_7037212_7650445_n.jpg


46525_467443225198_509315198_7037210_7630836_n.jpg


46525_467443220198_509315198_7037209_4684183_n.jpg
 
Last edited:
Good read. Chamfering a feed ramp into the barel was one of the first things I did to mine. I got it a few years ago at Gagnon, it's a Ducks Unlimited edition. Mine is a Henry, but does not have chering in the astock or an orange sight blade. I think I only paid around $200 for it in a nice aluminum DU carry case. I've often thought about what fun I could have with this simple little receiver if our gun laws were a little more lax.

-CZ
 
Your stock looks amazing :evil: , and I am excessively jealous and wishing you could cook one up for me as well! My previous attempts to use an AR-15 pistol-grip as the basis on a home-made replacement stock were met with only mixed success, and I've since abandoned the idea, but....

I still very much love my AR-7.....:yingyang:

So glad you got yours to work to your satisfaction!........:dancingbanana:

Also, great work on the front sight blade (greater visibility). By the way, my Henrry AR-7 had a dovetail groove cut into the top of the receiver....it looks liek the facotry changed things up on yours?

Regarding the cutting of the springs, well...;)...glad it worked for you! For my part, I've yet to do the spring-cutting, so I'm stuck with Minimags...for now!

Back in the day, Dino from Majestic Arms, as well as the guys at AR-7.com used to be able to ship to us here in Canada....sigh....

Finally, I've got a single 25-round Ramline plastic magazine; it seems to do okay in my Henry AR-7.

One more thing: If you ever take-down the rifle any further (i.e. pulling apart springs and such), just be careful and give yourself plenty of "work-space" because (1) the springs can/will fly places, and pieces can camoflauge themselves into carpet/flooring, and (2) it is possible to re-assemble the springs incorrectly (esp. the one that goes around the trigger).
 
Hey Cyclone, I've had it completely apart a few times now to see how it all works and a big +1 on keeping track of all the little parts. I haven't lost anything.... yet anyway. :)

The front sight blade comes from the factory blaze orange now. Some like it, some don't. I do as it makes it quite easy to find when looking through the little hole. The receiver has a standard 3/8 rail on the top with slots cut in to make it look more tacti-cool I guess... I guess they could probably market it as a weight saving feature. :rolleyes:

Cutting the recoil springs is super easy if you want to be able to shoot lighter loads - 2 coils off each spring. Simple as that. :D

I soooo want a 25 round mag for this gun!!!! If you ever sell yours (not that you actually would I imagine) send me a PM as I will snap it up for sure!! :dancingbanana:
 
Like I'd ever sell that! :rolleyes: Oh wait... :confused: I did already. :redface:

But I console myself with the fact that it has found a great safe to live in and will be used regularly to appease its appetite of grouse and rabbit. :)

ETA: Darn it! I think cyclone is rubbing off on me. :yingyang:
 
While I find Mini-mags are good quality and usually pretty good accuracy, I feel that they had better be for the price we pay for them!

I don't mind paying for quality, but only if I can't get that same, or at least very close, quality in something that is cheaper. And when it comes to .22 ammo, I usually can. Winchester DynaPoints for example often shoot much more accurately for me at a much reduced price and only a slight reduction in reliability. And don't even get me started on CCI Blazer; I love that stuff! :)
 
Nice review, I have a papoose and am thinking of making a similar type of stock for it, either chopping the existing one and adding to it or starting all over with a chunk of aluminum in school. (second year machining)

I do not like this idea of semi auto survival rifles though. Single shot bolt actions just seem to make more sense in a survival situation.

Soo, I am thinking of doing the same with my savage cub, making an aluminum stock.
 
Trigger pull is just a hair over 6 pounds. It has a bit of pre and post-travel but not as much as I thought there would be. It breaks cleanly and isn't mushy at all. It's actually a lot better than I expected.

It seemed rather heavy to me before I measured it (I originally estimated it at over 10 pounds) but I think the fact that the gun itself is so light, it gives the illusion of a heavier trigger.

I wouldn't say that I highly recommend this gun as it does have a few short comings and it really only fills a very narrow niche, but if you're a tinkerer and need a semi-auto rifle that is very lightweight and can be stored very compactly, then this is the rifle for you.
 
Back
Top Bottom