- Location
- Central AB
I have one of their carbines in 9mm and really like it. Seams really reliable. Cheap little blaster.
Wow. The consensus is in. It doesn't look good for Hi-Point so far. I was just thinking that I could use the Hi-Points rather than putting 1000's of rounds through my Sigs.
I agree on the SKS for SHTF. I have two SKS's, but as a "throw-away" sidearm the Hi-Point could work well for WROL. You could arm your whole family and relatives really cheaply. LOL.
Lol a friend referred to them as robocops gun!
We have sold many Hi-Point pistols in .40 S&W and .45 ACP. Despite looking and feeling very much like a DeWalt cordless drill (my major selling point for these **ahem!** beauties), the guns do shoot. Yes, the triggers are heavy. Yes, the guns are buckin' fugly. And yes, they do weigh a ton. But consider this, for $249.00, do you really expect the esthetics of a Cabot 1911, or the fit and finish of a Krieghoff drilling?
Target triggers? Bah! These guns are essentially bricks with a handle. The weight comes from the slide, in that the guns are direct blowback and do not feature any sort of locking lugs to retard movement of the slide until pressures in the chamber have subsided. Thus the heavy slide slows rearward movement until the pressure are safe enough to permit the ejection port to open.
Cracking frames? Really? Oh, wait, they come from Detroit that way, therefore they must be garbage. Or could it be that gang-bangers routinely wrap their pistols and shotguns and sawed-off rifles in duct tape because it is almost impossible to lift viable fingerprints off the uneven surface as it wears? How about, with the number of Hi-Points we have sold, not one has ever been returned to our store with a cracked frame. But the Internet says it's true, so who are we to question that undeniable fact?
I personally find the Hi-Point JCP and JHP pistols to be just about the ugliest handguns currently in production, but the damned things SHOOT. Witness the three customers we have had in the past year who have purchased Hi-Point guns and gone on to win IPSC matches at several different clubs around the province.
Ugly? Yes.
Reliable? Yes.
Good SHTF gun? Well, there are prettier models that will get the job done if you want to dazzle the walking dead with your fancy blinged-out STIs or SIG Sauer P22xs, but if it hurls lead down the barrel and knocks down whatever you point it at with relative frequency, it's better than a pointy stick, IMHO.
Hey look everyone, the internet is now telling us what great shooters they are! The internet is taking back what he said about hipoints! They must be quality awesome guns cuz the three he sold went on to win some of the 200 and something IPSC matches in Ontario they had in 2013. The internet said that he witnessed it! Hey, just by chance, this internet sells them too!
Now I am not trying to be a ####, just making a point that your just saying stuff on the internet like the countless people who have bashed the gun.
And a tokarev ....much much better shtf pistol and darn near indestructible too!!I have played with them while living in the USA. I would NEVER own one. EVER!
Just my opinion, they felt cheap, Kel-Tec seems to be a better option. Which still feel too plastic for me.
SHTF I would start with an SKS, from there a CZ/VZ 858/58 rifle, and up from there.
What is your price point?
And by that standard, your post does no better or worse on the topic.
The difference between reports from persons who have actually handled these guns, such as our store staff, our customers, and individuals such as yourself, is that those reports can be verified, unlike faceless, anonymous claims such as "a friend of a friend said. . . .", or "I read somewhere that. . . .", or "someone told me. . . .".
You see, sir, by your own intellectual indulgence, your claims regarding the effectiveness and usefulness of a handgun in any encounter -- be it for target shooting or personal defence -- add up to nothing more than additional Internet gossip, based upon your remarks above.
I could not fail to notice that your statements fall short of actually claiming to have fired a Hi-Point pistol, ending only with the remark "I laughed my ass off at how badly that gun would cut me up if I shot it." So I am curious as to what additional value your statements make to this topic at all, since by your own admission you have no first-hand knowledge or experience with these guns beyond perhaps handling one or two examples at a sales counter?
Conversely, the experiences of our shop, which sells these guns in high numbers, and provides servicing for those firearms in question -- as well as receiving first-hand reports as to their reliability from persons who have bought them from our store and used them in competition, or for recreational shooting, and therefore have first-hand experience with the function and reliability of those weapons -- would also suggest a degree of merit over unsubstantiated and unverifiable claims to the contrary.
Statements and reports such as these would hold significantly more legitimacy than some random proclamation that states "All Hi-Point pistol frames crack and break", or "It didn't fit my hand, therefore it must be crap."
Would you not agree?