- Location
- AB foothills
These work:
And if you are cheap and just want something for your pocket, these work:
And if you are cheap and just want something for your pocket, these work:
In my opinion they make a rifle look ugly and I can't see why anyone would want one. Most rifles have a magazine with at least four extra cartridges. What in the world makes you think you need quick access to more ammunition? Many years ago I went on a day hunt and took seven cartridges so I could have two left over for my pocket. Actually, I put one in each of two pockets so they wouldn't rattle. I shot a moose that day, so thought I had found a lucky number, and most of my life I have gone out hunting with a full mag and two in the pocket.
why would anybody need more than one shell?
gak said:Mags are always easiest to throw in a pocket.
Popcan:Mags look stupid taped to a Ruger #1
HeavenIsAlie: always just loaded the internal mag up (5) never really thought about carrying extra, but for a single shot it makes sense
In my opinion they make a rifle look ugly and I can't see why anyone would want one. Most rifles have a magazine with at least four extra cartridges. What in the world makes you think you need quick access to more ammunition? Many years ago I went on a day hunt and took seven cartridges so I could have two left over for my pocket. Actually, I put one in each of two pockets so they wouldn't rattle. I shot a moose that day, so thought I had found a lucky number, and most of my life I have gone out hunting with a full mag and two in the pocket.
If you have a wooden stock, then leather is the way to go, it just works better. Mine was custom made by my own design (well kinda). The bullets will never fall out, the leather just hugs them nicely. I believe that crazy_davey also knows some guy in Alaska that sells them, mine is from a local saddle maker.
![]()




























