This is NOT fact. You are absolutely incorrect. The APRA holds no keys. The facts are that the APRA ceased to be involved with the DCRA about 5 years ago. APRA is not the designated PRA for Alberta. As I have explained every year about this time, the APRA is merely the leaseholder with K Country. The APRA does not hold matches!
Just because no other entity in Alberta will step forward and start a new affiliate with the DCRA is not the APRA's problem. For reference, access to military ranges is not on anyone's radar at the APRA.
There is nothing stopping anyone from starting a new Alberta affiliate with the DCRA and taking their shoots to the military ranges.... except nobody involved with those disciplines seems interested in doing the legwork, so yet another season will drift by for those shooters. This annual blaming of the APRA is almost comical, if it wasn't so pathetic and ill informed. I predicted it for 2015, I will predict it again for 2016. I imagine at this rate you guys will still be blaming everyone else in 10 years, not just the 5 years that you have under your belt now.
It is easy to blame the APRA.........they went from being a full DCRA affiliated PRA with provincial reach to being a single location, under the same name, claiming the same history and privileges, private range.
As for not being the designated (and therefore legitimate) PRA, according to the DCRA for 2014 the provincially appointed vice-president for Alberta was F. Lalear, and the PRA designated member to DCRA council was A. Tikkanen.
That must be a mistake however as the "The facts are that the APRA ceased to be involved with the DCRA about 5 years ago. APRA is not the designated PRA for Alberta".
The DCRA must be wrong however because that would mean the APRA is the DCRA affiliate which means the APRA is and has been sitting on the authority to book military ranges (the keys to the ranges I spoke of). The fact that participation might be very limited and only conducted so APRA members are eligible to compete at other PRA/DCRA events and be members of DCRA teams if they choose is still participation.
rpollock I await your rebuttal to my pathetic and ill-informed opinion.
I just read the DCRA bylaws and it makes sense now.
It is pretty much a have their cake and eat it too relationship that the APRA has with the DCRA.
As there is no affiliated PRA in Alberta APRA/Homestead members can join the DCRA for cheap and participate in DCRA and other PRA matches those years that they want to travel out of province. If there was an affiliated PRA in Alberta they would also need to join that PRA in order to be able to join the DCRA. Kind of like how I can't opt out of the BCRA and just join the DCRA.
Am I pretty close?
Frank may very well be the DCRA appointed delegate for Alberta, this has no bearing on today's APRA. Frank knows APRA is not the PRA and so does DCRA. Frank was the one who lobbied to sever the relationship. Why the charade continues is anyone's guess, maybe optics?
The APRA being the recognized PRA is the very premise behind the approved lease hold in the first place...
I'd wager a bet the Fullbore group no doubt still receives and issues the annual allotment of medals as well.
On second thought ,Looks like like a ten year prediction may have been a little light .The APRA being the recognized PRA is the very premise behind the approved lease hold in the first place...
I'd wager a bet the Fullbore group no doubt still receives and issues the annual allotment of medals as well.



























