Hot off the press re May 18

H2000 said:
Mark says it's "not a registry"!!! Guess the guy didn't go to school or he's just plain lying to us and the public. I choose the latter.
Click to expand...

He may have gone to school, but it doesn't mean he learned anything.

I say both are applicable in his case.
 
RyoTHC said:
Thank god I sold all my rifles already.
It’s a damn shame I had to cancel my Bren 2 pre order, but it’s not worth having when they are just going to confiscate it as soon as they have everyone’s info.

My gun license is going dormant from this point forward, thankfully it’s already valid until 2027 and hopefully Justin has came out as trans and ran for UN leader by then.
Click to expand...



Yup, selling all mine as well
It’s a shame !
 
This has been the worst dictatorship ever. I guess parking trucks on the street didn't help any. Canadians have the worst uprisings.
 
Not being a dink tired of people asking questions when the answer is in front of there nose simply read the act it is all there.
If you don’t get it read it again .!!!!
.another one what is the definition of a business do you have a business licence if no then you are not a business
 
For now the only affected purchase is at a retail outlet it will b called in just like before the difference is no registration certificate.
There is know time frame for individuals to comply for now .
Firearms coming into the country are not registered at point of entry the system is dropped on the retailer
 
The fact that guns will be "registered" even just for bringing them in for repairs is mind boggling. The amount of paperwork on that alone will fill up who knows how many filing cabinets. What happens when these businesses run out of room to keep paper? And isn't the government supposed to be preventing climate change, not exacerbating it with all of these files that I'm sure will have to be kept physically and digitally?
 
I wonder what would happen if let’s say a shop “had kept” all records but their computer crashed and died which had all their records on it and they had to throw it in the garbage? ��
 
It will make it easier for them to implement the U N gun marking plan.More than likely in the future even privately sold guns will have to be U N marked.I remember quite a while ago Bill Blair was complaining that without a gun registry it was harder to implement the U N system and they needed to find a way to do it.This new system will also probably kill the gun flippers as now it will be a real pain to do so on a regular basis and continually buying then quickly reselling might bring under suspicion of gun running or they might tell you that you will need a vendors license to do so if you buy and sell too many
 
Last edited:
diabeticfreak said:
The fact that guns will be "registered" even just for bringing them in for repairs is mind boggling. The amount of paperwork on that alone will fill up who knows how many filing cabinets. What happens when these businesses run out of room to keep paper? And isn't the government supposed to be preventing climate change, not exacerbating it with all of these files that I'm sure will have to be kept physically and digitally?
Click to expand...

Once you understand what their goals are, it is not mind boggling at all.
They are pretty much openly mocking us at this point...they are well aware of the fact, that this has nothing to do with reducing gun crimem
 
Most businesses have already been doing this for years. I know that Cabelas, p&d, wild west in Edmonton all kept a copy of my name, pal, gun serial, etc, when I purchased guns in person. I'm assuming most of the stores across the country have done it when I purchased online, as the receipts they sent me all contained that info as well. Surely they are keeping a copy of the receipt they send out.

Not that I support the changes, but realistically, what is changing?
 
Pipester said:
Most businesses have already been doing this for years. I know that Cabelas, p&d, wild west in Edmonton all kept a copy of my name, pal, gun serial, etc, when I purchased guns in person. I'm assuming most of the stores across the country have done it when I purchased online, as the receipts they sent me all contained that info as well. Surely they are keeping a copy of the receipt they send out.

Not that I support the changes, but realistically, what is changing?
Click to expand...

What is changing is the fact, that after you bring the firearm home from the store, before may 18-th you have the option of selling it to Mike from Canmore and that gun is gone from the system.
After the 18-th, you can legally no longer do that, as there will be a refference number requirement.

This way they put their foot in the door as far as tracking the movement of the firearms...
The next stage will be a requirement to call in the model/serial number...after that the LGR 2.0 will be complete.
 
CZ Shooter said:
What is changing is the fact, that after you bring the firearm home from the store, before may 18-th you have the option of selling it to Mike from Canmore and that gun is gone from the system.
After the 18-th, you can legally no longer do that, as there will be a refference number requirement.

This way they put their foot in the door as far as tracking the movement of the firearms...
The next stage will be a requirement to call in the model/serial number...after that the LGR 2.0 will be complete.
Click to expand...

It’s a requirement to provide all infos on the firearms in those new bs rules.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top Bottom