Hot off the press re May 18

powerbaitron said:
Have the Conservative candidates spoke about this issue at all in the leadership race?
Click to expand...

Leslyn Lewis. Got an email Yesterday

Canadians are not afraid of farmers, sports-shooters, or hunters, but that doesn’t stop the Liberals from rolling out another version of their infamous gun registry to punish these groups.

I desperately want Canada to be the safest country in the world. I know what it’s like to hear about a shooting in downtown Toronto, near where my kids were headed with their friends, and pray that they were alright.

And though I have never suffered such a tragedy, too many mothers have received the worst possible news one can ever get.

We need to focus on stopping the flow of illegal firearms being smuggled across our borders, and supporting our law enforcement to shut down real criminal activity.

We need to invest in effective programs that will stop gangs from preying on vulnerable youth.

All of this can be accomplished without another heavy-handed and pointless gun ban.

As my colleague Raquel Dancho pointed out yesterday, the Liberals have not put forward a single policy that would actually accomplish anything to make Canadians safer, and only attack law-abiding firearms owners to make a show.



When it comes to firearms, government action should focus on keeping guns out of the hands of criminals, while respecting law-abiding Canadians.

This is exactly how I will approach firearms as Prime Minister.

I am proposing a full review of ALL current firearms laws. I want to ensure that government efforts are entirely focused on keeping guns out of the hands of gangs and other criminals.

It’s time for a complete review of Canada’s firearms laws to make sure that they are actually doing what they’re supposed to do. Any law that doesn't follow common sense will have to go.

We need a simplified classification system that is determined by gun experts, law enforcement, farmers, and sports shooters, instead of politicians and bureaucrats.

In this race many candidates will have somewhat similar common-sense policies regarding firearms. The reason why I believe I am the candidate best positioned to defend your rights and freedoms is based on both my professional and life experience.

As a lawyer I have studied these laws and understand their weaknesses. As a mother who raised her children in the GTA, I am best positioned to reveal the hypocrisy and futility of the Liberals' failed policies. As a rural resident and MP my constituents are the ones who are now being punished for no reason by the Liberals and pointless firearm bans.

As someone who has gone through the Canadian Firearms Safety Course, I know firsthand the strong rules that are in place and the many hoops that law-abiding gun owners already need to jump through.

Do you agree with my common-sense approach on firearms?
 
Hear’s a thought!?! What’s stopping a person from contacting the individual web service for the transfer and giving them a random serial number for a non existent gun and using someone else’s real Pal number as the recipient of said firearm and just flooding the web service with fake transfers. And when they call the Recipient they have no knowledge. Good system RCMP! Hopefully what I said makes sense. As the transfer is only one sided.
 
Helka said:
Hear’s a thought!?! What’s stopping a person from contacting the individual web service for the transfer and giving them a random serial number for a non existent gun and using someone else’s real Pal number as the recipient of said firearm and just flooding the web service with fake transfers. And when they call the Recipient they have no knowledge. Good system RCMP! Hopefully what I said makes sense. As the transfer is only one sided.
Click to expand...

Runkle of the Bailey has made a video on this where he exposes how this law is the most vulnerable to fraud he could have thought of.
 
CZ Shooter said:
Once you understand what their goals are, it is not mind boggling at all.
They are pretty much openly mocking us at this point...they are well aware of the fact, that this has nothing to do with reducing gun crimem
Click to expand...
I second this… anything and everything to bog down private transactions… Miramache will simply leave the phone off the hook, and their online capacity, will be “ down” for “ maintenance “… major discouragement, for private sales.
 
I have an interesting thought, time to buy those serialized lowers of the guns you want before the 18th of May 2022 get the top part of the firearm 3 weeks later all lengths of the new gun are the same regardless. Now that you have the main part of the gun in your hands which is the serial number prior to the May 18th deadline on your bill of sale indicates you already own the firearm prior to the new regulations they mail it to you after they received your order paid in full. I have seen an example of this from the Shooting Edge. Go figure looks too simple and will go like hot cakes off the griddle in my humble opinion. Long live the freedom of owning a scary gun. I know I have one that is on the prohibited list and it's the Colt AR-15a2 Sporter California prohibition days
 
I wonder what would happen if let’s say a shop “had kept” all records but their computer crashed and died which had all their records on it and they had to throw it in the garbage?
Click to expand...

Lose your firearms business license instantly.

Get charged with obstruction of justice (and whatever other nonsense charges).

Get your store shut down and your entire inventory confiscated.

Get your bank accounts seized.

Get showcased on CBC news as a terrorist, racist, wife-beater, etc.
 
Helka said:
Hear’s a thought!?! What’s stopping a person from contacting the individual web service for the transfer and giving them a random serial number for a non existent gun and using someone else’s real Pal number as the recipient of said firearm and just flooding the web service with fake transfers. And when they call the Recipient they have no knowledge. Good system RCMP! Hopefully what I said makes sense. As the transfer is only one sided.
Click to expand...

you hit the nail right on the head,having a name and valid PAl number is all anyone needs to buy a gun privately,so much for the great safety of our license system,obviously this doesn't work for restricteds,then again,criminal buying handguns are concerned about buying them legally,LOL
 
Dexter Morgan said:
Lose your firearms business license instantly.

Get charged with obstruction of justice (and whatever other nonsense charges).

Get your store shut down and your entire inventory confiscated.

Get your bank accounts seized.

Get showcased on CBC news as a terrorist, racist, wife-beater, etc.
Click to expand...

Small fringe minority store with unacceptable views
 
Helka said:
Hear’s a thought!?! What’s stopping a person from contacting the individual web service for the transfer and giving them a random serial number for a non existent gun and using someone else’s real Pal number as the recipient of said firearm and just flooding the web service with fake transfers. And when they call the Recipient they have no knowledge. Good system RCMP! Hopefully what I said makes sense. As the transfer is only one sided.
Click to expand...

well with technology today you betch they have the number your calling from stored - by calling them your leaving a digital fingerprint
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top Bottom