wtf..... at the end we're those 100's of dead animals piled up?
bastards.
peta would have a field day with them.
See: http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=kT1LCuxXdcg&feature=related
wtf..... at the end we're those 100's of dead animals piled up?
bastards.
peta would have a field day with them.
Don't forget,we are all descended from successful hunters.A pack of wolves taking down a moose ain't pretty either,but they gotta eat.Life ain't a Disney movie,and last I heard,Sobey's hasn't expanded into Africa.(yet,lol)
While watching the animals fight for life while suffering multiple spear hits is perhaps not for the faint of heart, it's simply reality. None of those guys have acess to a 375 H&H and they gotta eat.
I personally would be getting a huge rush, and if presented with the opportunity to hunt alongside those spearmen, I would take it in a heartbeat. I doubt there is much in the hunting world that compares to squaring off against an elephant, armed only with your spears.
Just thought I'd pipe up.
A lot of you were saying that they are 'doing this out of necessity'... which I don't believe is entirely true.
Watch the original video the (one first posted). Take special notice at 2:34 minutes in, the one where the natives are chucking spears at the Elephant's face. At 2:35 you can see a puff of gun smoke, and the Elephant drops suddenly. Obviously it was shot, and the only conclusion I can draw from that particular example is that they were spearing the Elephant for fun. The face isn't a good area to strike with a spear, and they are obviously smart enough to know that.
Possibly....I wasnt' there. But a spear through the eye of an animal might put it down fast, no?
Even if these 'men' are doing this out of necessity, they sure do suck at it. Even cavemen had half the mind to corral random herds and spook them into running off of cliffs, or picking one animal and dispatching it quickly, as the longer it lives the more at risk the hunters were to severe injury. A broken bone can be fixed easily today, it could have been life ending back then
Not too many cliffs on the plains of Africa, looks like. And a volley of spears was probably the fastest way to kill a single animal.![]()
what i cant see is why someone would want to kill an elephant.
Same reason as killing a deer- Meat and/or trophy.

I agree with you there on your points. BUT... did you see how many times each animal was shanked? like... wouldn't the gutts have ruptured on all of those animals= nasty meat?
Don't forget crop/habitat damage.Elephants are a terrible nuisance in areas where the bunnyhuggers have won the battle and they aren't hunted.They'll eat everything in site and literally starve themselves out,which is why they then need to be slaughtered.The videos of these elephant culls are just that,the culling of overpopulated elephants,however the bunny-huggers use such footage to tug on heartstrings and solicit funds,misrepresenting these cull hunts as the norm for bloodthirsty sporthunters.BOOHOO.....PLEASE...STOP THE SLAUGHTER!!!Fknidiots!!If they hadn't stopped the responsible management and hunting in the first place,there would be no need for the culls.![]()
The threat to the African elephant presented by the ivory trade is unique to the species. Larger, long-lived, slow-breeding animals, like the elephant, are more susceptible to overhunting than other animals. They cannot hide, and it takes many years for an elephant to grow and reproduce. An elephant needs an average of 140 kg (300 lb) of vegetation a day to survive. As large predators are hunted, the local small grazer populations (the elephant's food competitors) find themselves on the rise. The increased number of herbivores ravage the local trees, shrubs, and grasses. Elephants themselves have few natural predators besides man and, occasionally, lions.
Habitat destruction is a far greater threat to wildlife than a hunters bullet ever will be...
I don't get why so many people assume that man needs to regulate nature. It has been doing this for itself for millions of years, following boom and bust cycles. .




























