How good will my rifle shoot at 1078 yards...

Status
Not open for further replies.
Please elaborate?

No one knows me..........:confused:

PM will do.

All I can Say is that I heard alot about you, from other used to talk to, that all, I can't judge You because I don't really know you, So just leave at that.

As a business owner I find these discussions (right or wrong) extremely distasteful.
The potential loss of both business and reputation is chilling and it needs to be stopped.

Given the (current) lofty public stature of PGW I would most respectfully suggest that a widely viewed forum such as this is no place to publicly flog a competitor.

I will continue to support both businesses.

Regards

Like I said, they like to make Outrageous Statement, this is not the first or Last Either, it about time that there Other heavy weight come in and straighten thing out abit,
From What I see from PGW, my next gun would be a Timberwolf, or C. That the Kind of Respect that I got for them, they don't just say They going to make action , they do it, Probably more successful than Most Other, that why it piss Some right OFF!...

GUNBOY
 
Tell you what guys, instead of just saying it can't be done, direct your energy towards making a gun that will do it. I'm not going to change my setup before going back out to our range and coming back with results so why don't you guys do the same. If you can't be bothered to crank out a non-military spec Timberwolf that will actually produce amazing results then don't post a bunch of trash talk and get everyone on the band wagon. I know for a fact that my guns built by Alberta Tactical Rifle aren't ment to be hauled into a sand box because of the tolerances so I'm not sure why you're trying to compare apples to oranges. Is one better then the other? For a particular application both are better then the other so let it go already. Realisticly, if I wanted to shoot consistent groups at extended range, I'd probably try to launch the heaviest most consistently built bullet I could get my hands on because every bullet no matter the wieght has it's range limits but inside of it's limits, it's got a predictable trajectory and it will consistently fall towards the same point of aim. I showed you guys a target that four rounds fell consistently onto at a recorded distance that I thought wasn't THAT big a deal. Obviously my idea of 'Not that big a deal' was more of a big deal to some and I guess I offended 'SOME' people with my statement.
All you've done now is make me want to show you up and personally I think that's the wrong reason for going out and trying to do your best. As Rick mentioned there are a number of enthusiasts who have been surprised with the accuracy of their custom rifles upon delivery and load developement and some post results and some don't. The guys that post results are laughed off the forum by nonbelievers that either don't have the skill or don't have the discipline to go out and try it themselves. This particular area of the forum is dedicated to 'Precision Rifles' and the pursute of just that so why ruin it?

By the way, thanks for the link to the world record holder. I think we all find articles like that interesting. Personally I wouldn't have gone with that caliber but this guy set a world record with it and that's more then I can say I've done.


If this thread has taught me anything it's that I now have something to proove to the rest of the member on this forum and it's going to speak volumes for the rifle I've had built, the caliber I've chosen, the scope I've equipped it with and all the rest of the components that have gone into the results I'm going to come back with.

Steve and Ross, I think the offer was made clear to you that if you want to come out and shoot with us not as competitors but as enthusiests having a good time, then come on out and enjoy our hospitality. There's something that can be learnt from everyone because we've all traveled down different paths in our lives. All we can do is extend the courtesy. The guys behind the wheel of the BMWs aren't always a**holes, and Rick came to realize that too. LOL


If you regularly/consistently shoot sub 3" groups @ 1100 yards, then you have the gun and ability. Perhaps you should do so in official competition so you can put your name on a world record.
 
I don't think the tone of my posts has been flogging a competitors product. My posts have been directed at an anonymous person on the internet that has many times stated he does not work for ATR and is making some pretty incredible claims about his and his rifles shooting ability. I would simply like to see these claims backed up. I have next to no knowledge of ATR's business and I have never seen one of his rifles so I can't make any informed opinion, and if I did have an opinion, I wouldn't be slagging him on the internetz. Again, I'm questioning some wild claims and nothing more.

Not Just you , but any one visiting the site would laught about it, Like I said Outrageous!, and Mis representing.
 
I wouldn't think twice about buying my NEXT RIFLE from PGW, now that I see they COME out and Strait A FEW THING, actually Have some balls and say what in their Mind.

Timberwolf338.jpg
 
Here's some more fodder for you GunBoy lol

I've owned Sako, HS Precision, and Timberwolf.

Sold all 3 and moved up to an ATRS tactical rifle. HUGE difference in accuracy. ATRS tactical rifle is much better in every way. Consistent MOA under 1/4 when dialed.

No offense/mockery intended for Toomanyguns or ATRS - it just seemed relevant to this thread.
 
Originally Posted by Toomanyguns
I've owned Sako, HS Precision, and Timberwolf.

Sold all 3 and moved up to an ATRS tactical rifle. HUGE difference in accuracy. ATRS tactical rifle is much better in every way. Consistent MOA under 1/4 when dialed.

That's a good laugh.
 
"Consistent MOA under 1/4 when dialed." How can you argue with results like that? These groups just keep getting smaller.....

AMP DSR is good enough to get .2 MOA on a 10 shot string using premium ammuntion maybe not consistantly but when you do your part it does and can happen
 
So I'm new to all this precision/competition stuff but in my world 30 sec (1/2 min) at 1078 yards is
sin 0.008333(1078*3)
=0.47'
If you can shoot at 1/2 min thats 0.5' at 1078yards right or am I off track?
3" at 1078yards would be around 15 sec or (1/4 min) right?

Just trying to get this all straight.
 
So I'm new to all this precision/competition stuff but in my world 30 sec (1/2 min) at 1078 yards is
sin 0.008333(1078*3)
=0.47'
If you can shoot at 1/2 min thats 0.5' at 1078yards right or am I off track?
3" at 1078yards would be around 15 sec or (1/4 min) right?

Just trying to get this all straight.

Treebutcher you have got the math straight. 60 minutes of angle in a degree, etc. Half a minute of angle is 0.47 feet at 1078 yards, or 5.64 inches.

The math is made much easier using the approximation that "one minute of angle is one inch per hundred yards of range" (not exactly correct, it's actually 1.047", but "an inch" is oftentimes the right approximation to use). Sometimes this is called a "shooters minute", or sometime "IPHY" (an awkward abbrev. for "inch per hundred yards")

So ten inches at a thousand yards is (about) a minute. Half a minute at a thousand is five inches. Three inches at a thousand yards is less that a third of a minute.

At 1078 yards (not a standard shooting distance either in yards or in meters), three inches is less than 0.3 MOA

It so happens that the standard US "Long Range" target, which is used at 800, 900 and 1000 yards, uses a 10" diameter X-ring and a 20" diameter ten-ring. It is a fairly challenging target to shoot at using iron sights. A good shooter on a day with easy conditions can expect to get a majority of his shots in the ten-ring, with about half his shots going into the "X". Getting a "clean" score (15 shots into the ten, scoring 150 out of 150) is not certainly unheard of, but you can be pretty proud of yourself when you do it. I've never done it.

For F-Class, which in many ways is "prone benchrest", there is an F-Class version of the target - basically every scoring ring value is moved "one in". So on the "LR-FC" target, the 20" diameter circle scores nine points, the 10" diameter circle scores ten points, and an added 5" diameter ring scores an "X". This target has been in use in the USA for several years now, you can check out what sorts of scores are being fired in US F-Class matches, and you can see what sorts of records are being set (see the US NRA web site). Generally it seems that the F-Class target for an F-Class shooter is a little bit more difficult (score-wise) than the iron sights target for an irons shooter. At a match where the top iron sight shooter might score say a 150-9X, the winning F-Class score might be 148-7X (to give you an idea of the relative difficult level).

While "clean" scores (all tens) in 1000 yard F-Class are doable, they too are pretty worthwhile. And while you sometimes see impressively high "X" counts, I don't think anybody has ever shot 150-15X at 1000 yards (that would be fifteen out of fifteen shots into a 5" circle).

The F Class World Championship was fired in July 2009 in Bisley. The results can be found on the NRA-UK web site, they shot on the same target mentioned above except that it was a five-point target system, i.e. the ten inch ring scored five points and the five inch ring scored a "V-bull". (Americans and Europeans like targets with tens and Xs. Brits Canadians etc like targets with fives and Vs. Same general idea though!)

Have a look at the scores fired by the best F-Class shooters in the world, you will see that very few shooters managed to get half of their shots into the 5" V-ring.
 
Last edited:
Originally Posted by Toomanyguns
I've owned Sako, HS Precision, and Timberwolf.

Sold all 3 and moved up to an ATRS tactical rifle. HUGE difference in accuracy. ATRS tactical rifle is much better in every way. Consistent MOA under 1/4 when dialed.

That's a good laugh.

I have ask Rick in the pass gun show about his Gun with the Neskisa action, and his answer was more than $10,000 for it, if it was that good, people would know about it already, everytime they on Gunnutz talking about tactical, it alway about how good the stuff they carry, how much better lapua brass is better than Federal, even went on Gunnutz and say that he only make $50 Per Gunstock(Mcmillan),and continuedly shooting other down for there Opinion, I know alot of people I talk to here in Edmonton, also in Calgary, they know how ATR is and will stay away from them, but his Side kick cause alot of trouble, he is more trouble than he worth to Rick, that my Opinion, even go so far Threaten about coming to Edmonton all the time and visiting his Biker buddy, I wish the guy would let me know ahead of time when he is coming, he know that I am at Genesee all the time, about the only range I go to, that not the only thing that happen, there is more, but like I say have nothing again Rick, but but thte sidekick was another story..., I am still Laughting my head of, it a good story when you got you bud in you hand, and laught about it, 3"-1000yard, Fuucking funny!....
 
Last edited:
Status
Not open for further replies.
Back
Top Bottom