Yup its getting used. You running jacketed also. that will make the forcing cone wear faster the rest looks normal wear and tare. You've ran more ammo threw one gun than I shot in the last 50 yrs LOL! Awesome to see the gun still holding up. Any timing issues spitting lead or stiil good.
Yup its getting used. You running jacketed also. that will make the forcing cone wear faster the rest looks normal wear and tare. You've ran more ammo threw one gun than I shot in the last 50 yrs LOL! Awesome to see the gun still holding up. Any timing issues spitting lead or stiil good.
Side cover crack is NOT normal wear an tear....well at least not in my eyes.....if I seen that on one of my revolvers it would be going In for warranty replacement asap
The flame cutting should only go so far i understand. Also, setting the barrel back and recutting the forcing cone sounds like a royal pain in the butt. Not sure how you would do that on the smith without it resulting in a canted barrel?I'll weld it at the same time as the flame cutting gets filled in, the forcing cone re-cut and the barrel set back.
The flame cutting should only go so far i understand. Also, setting the barrel back and recutting the forcing cone sounds like a royal pain in the butt. Not sure how you would do that on the smith without it resulting in a canted barrel?
Wow! That s some pile of 44 shooting. Can shooters get Carpel Tunnel Syndrome.
Hickock 45 has put 75,000 rounds through his 8 3/8" 29. He's had to replace a few parts, but it's still going strong.
To use your analogy, pretty much any engine from the 426 Hemi era was completely done by 100K compared to modern engines that are barely broken in by then. As far as S&W quality control, other than the grips shattering and all the screws coming loose, no part has actually failed on my gun. There may be something to their "endurance package" after all. It took 14k plus rounds to work all the bugs out but I have to say that this particular gun works far better than it did when it was new. I was going to visit their museum but spent too much time finding and visiting the Springfield National Armory museum. Really wish I had been able to stay the extra day.I've owned a few S&W revolvers. I owned a 629 for wilderness carry in the 80s, and currently own an older 29-2 with 4" barrel. I've never really considered a revolver of this type a good candidate for high volume shooting. To me it would be like trying to drive a 426 Hemi 200,000 miles. Not gonna happen. My thoughts on S&W in general - Their factory is in a fairly liberal town, in a fairly liberal state. I have to wonder if the employees take much pride in their product. The company is also taking a path that wasn't sustainable for GM. They just have too many distinct models. I've seen their factory in Springfield. Keeping track of the tooling for 100 different products can't be easy. I'm OK thinking they could probably get by with half as many models.
15603 rounds
100 - Federal 24, 25, 26, 27 times fired, 23.8 gr IMR4227, CCI300 and 100 - Starline 7 times fired, 22.0 gr Vectan Ba6-1/2, CCI300 both with Campro 240s.
This Vectan powder is my new favourite. It's cleaner, quieter and smoother than anything else I've ever used.
Where did you get the Vectan powder?




























