I don't believe that my reading skills are lacking, I believe that they are just fine. Perhaps it is simply your inference that "Since I am not retarded, I never forget my ammo". There are 2 logic statements, which, when combined with the conjunctive comma, deliver a finite conclusion.
1. You are not retarded.
2. you never forget your ammo.
For the sake of argument, I can accept that and I will. Therefore you are not retarded and you do not forget your ammo. However, if you did forget your ammo, that would make you retarded. Extrapolating this further is the generalization implied by your statement that anyone forgetting their ammo must be retarded. This inference is further re-enforced by your next two statements of "how the hell could anyone forget their ammo?" and "Would they forget their truck?"
Allowing as there was no dis-associative verbiage between your first statement and the next two, there is no way for the reader to ascertain that the subjective "you" used when applying the first statement pertaining to yourself in a indiscriminate manner, is not directly applied to the subsequent amplifying statements.
That being the case, a logical derivation of the three statements is that anyone forgetting their ammo, or truck, would have to be retarded. If this was not the intention of your post, perhaps you should have reviewed the composition of your submission and edited it accordingly. Thanks for playing.![]()
Personally I haven't forgot ammo, but I did forget the key for the trigger lock. Same result: no hunting.
I don't believe that my reading skills are lacking, I believe that they are just fine. Perhaps it is simply your inference that "Since I am not retarded, I never forget my ammo". There are 2 logic statements, which, when combined with the conjunctive comma, deliver a finite conclusion.
1. You are not retarded.
2. you never forget your ammo.
For the sake of argument, I can accept that and I will. Therefore you are not retarded and you do not forget your ammo. However, if you did forget your ammo, that would make you retarded. Extrapolating this further is the generalization implied by your statement that anyone forgetting their ammo must be retarded. This inference is further re-enforced by your next two statements of "how the hell could anyone forget their ammo?" and "Would they forget their truck?"
Allowing as there was no dis-associative verbiage between your first statement and the next two, there is no way for the reader to ascertain that the subjective "you" used when applying the first statement pertaining to yourself in a indiscriminate manner, is not directly applied to the subsequent amplifying statements.
That being the case, a logical derivation of the three statements is that anyone forgetting their ammo, or truck, would have to be retarded. If this was not the intention of your post, perhaps you should have reviewed the composition of your submission and edited it accordingly. Thanks for playing.![]()
If you are traveling by air to your hunting location, consider how often bags are misplaced by the airlines? Thats how often it happens. So you've landed in Schefferville on the way to your caribou hunt of a lifetime when you discover the bag with your 6.5-284 handloads didn't make it. Good luck with that.
I've flown a couple of times withing Canada on hunting trips.
I sent my ammo down well in advance of the actual hunt. Problem solved.
Not a whole lot of 250 Ackley kicking around in the local gun shops.![]()
Wow, this is good. You're not known as Cliff Claven as per chance?![]()
I said I'm not retarded, never called anyone retarded.![]()



























