Hunting rifles are on the ban list

Velocity is squared in the formula calculation for kinetic energy, but energy is maximized (in the real world), with increased mass... most of the cartridges you mentioned are not 10K joule guns.

Right, this is why as far as muzzle energy, the 130>150 in 270 WCF. The 150>170 in the 30-30, the 150>200 in the 300 Wby, the 270>300 in 375 Ruger, the 125>158 in 357 Mag, etc etc.

The 470 has more case capacity than the 460 Wby
If the 416 Wby can push a 400 grainer at 2700fps (8780J), it, the 450/400 and the Rigby are CAPABLE of making 10k with a lighter bullet as is the old 577/450 Martini.

My guess is any case larger than the 458 Winchester over 40 cal is capable of making 10k with bullets +/- 200 grains. Velocity is squared.
 
Right, this is why as far as muzzle energy, the 130>150 in 270 WCF. The 150>170 in the 30-30, the 150>200 in the 300 Wby, the 270>300 in 375 Ruger, the 125>158 in 357 Mag, etc etc.

The 470 has more case capacity than the 460 Wby
If the 416 Wby can push a 400 grainer at 2700fps (8780J), it, the 450/400 and the Rigby are CAPABLE of making 10k with a lighter bullet as is the old 577/450 Martini.

My guess is any case larger than the 458 Winchester over 40 cal is capable of making 10k with bullets +/- 200 grains. Velocity is squared.

You are confusing real world physics with your untested theory, ie. "X" .40 cal plus cartridge with "Y" microscopic bullet @ 1 Billion feet per second equals "BANNED."

Wrong, squaring velocity in the KE calculation does not inflate work by its square. In the real world of applied physics you will find that the opposite occurs. It is tough to show this with the larger cartridges, because nobody is making Superlight bullets for them and testing loads for that combination... but let's use a more moderate example and extrapolate data directly from the latest Nosler manual.

Using the .338 Lapua Magnum as a test case.

.338 LM with 300 grain bullet @ 2732 fps has KE = 6739.86 J

With your theory, a 200 grain bullet should have significantly more energy (as you said repeatedly, velocity is squared). Here is what we find in the real world;

.338 LM with 200 grain bullet @ 3188 fps has KE = 6118.36 J

Huh? Velocity was squared but the energy expressed in joules went down? This is because in the real world increased mass more efficiently utilizes the applied force and in addition it overcomes detracting factors such as friction and resistance.

Do you really think that our incompetent government are going to hire a team of scientists to manufacture and test ridiculously light bullets in order to ban firearms chambered large bore cartridges?

Here are some numbers for the top loads from manuals for various cartridges, as noted above, in the real world utilizing very light bullets will NOT dramatically increase the energy expressed in joules;

458 WM with 250, KE = 6557.52 J

.460 Wby with 350, KE = 8306.72 J

.470 NE with 500 = KE = 7178.66 J

.375 RUM with 260 = KE = 7166.03 J

.416 RM with 400 = KE = 7543.1 J
 
It easy to calculate energy in foot pound velocity X velocity X bullet weight in grains divide that by 450,240 = energy in foot pounds
not sure of the conversion to joules.
 
It easy to calculate energy in foot pound velocity X velocity X bullet weight in grains divide that by 450,240 = energy in foot pounds
not sure of the conversion to joules.

Theoretical physics and applied physics don't always line up... for example any archer can tell you that a heavier arrow nets MORE kinetic energy in real world numbers (mass times chronographed velocity squared), than does a lighter arrow travelling faster, with the same force applied to each. The principle holds true for bullets also. I can understand why there is confusion amongst people when they see the velocity being squared in the formula... this just does not translate in the real world.

With bullets and the myriad of powders and components, the practical application becomes far more convoluted and can only be confirmed with actual testing... until then we are stuck with generalizations and the experts data(manufacturers; ie, Nosler, Hornady, Hodgdon etc...).
 
Last edited:
458 Rem Mag?

The .458 is probably banned too. Does anyone know if a person can sell a prohibited rifle to someone in another country during the "amnesty"? I know it can't be sold in Canada.
 
The .458 is probably banned too. Does anyone know if a person can sell a prohibited rifle to someone in another country during the "amnesty"? I know it can't be sold in Canada.

If you mean the .458 "Win Mag," it would not appear to be a 10K Joules cartridge.
 
In the early 90's there was an article entitled something like "A 4000 Feet per Second 458" in a magazine named something like "Canadian Hunting and Shooting".

In it the author took the 458 Winchester in a Ruger No 1 to 4000 fps using 30 caliber bullets and homemade sabots made out of teflon spacers or something like that.

If the 30 cal bullet and sabot weighed 208 grains or more, that is 10,000 joules.
 
In the early 90's there was an article entitled something like "A 4000 Feet per Second 458" in a magazine named something like "Canadian Hunting and Shooting".

In it the author took the 458 Winchester in a Ruger No 1 to 4000 fps using 30 caliber bullets and homemade sabots made out of teflon spacers or something like that.

If the 30 cal bullet and sabot weighed 208 grains or more, that is 10,000 joules.

You are really working hard at this aren't you???

Ok, you win, everything over .40 cal is a 10K joules rifle and is effectively banned.
 
You are really working hard at this aren't you???

Ok, you win, everything over .40 cal is a 10K joules rifle and is effectively banned.

Right, because quoting reloading manuals and denying how wide the net has beem cast is the way to go.
 
Right, because quoting reloading manuals and denying how wide the net has beem cast is the way to go.

I agree, instead let's talk nonsense physics and tell them they missed a bunch of rifles that we are tired of oiling and storing.
 
I wonder if they will grandfather or buy back, not cheap to start buying back 460 weatherby's

Consider there is no market for a 460 weatherby or any other FA they just classified as Prohibited, it would make it worthless here in Canada.
 
Wake up for Gods sake.
We have a PM who is not capable of running a street side lemon aid stand.
Give away a couple hundred million a day each and every day.
Makes you feel good right?
Think his BS is coming for your 460?
This pack of clowns couldn’t ref a rock fight in a gravel pit.
 
You honestly think they “missed anything”?
The goal is complete disarmament.

What I think is that we are all on the same team here, we are all shooting sports enthusiasts, and this fascist BAN marks a significant shift in how we move forward... it would behoove us to not quibble over scraps and debate nuances, but collectively do all we can to let the government know that this is NOT "ok." Nobody here is happy about a single gun being banned, let alone thousands.
 
Back
Top Bottom