Typical does not = unequivocal.
I think I made that pretty clear in my previous post.
Minimal expansion does not always = poor bullet performance either
Last edited:
Typical does not = unequivocal.
I think I made that pretty clear in my previous post.
Minimal expansion does not always = poor bullet performance either
Yes, but the typical response "poo-poo's" the idea that it could be poor bullet performance. If I buy a bullet that is designed for caliber appropriate big game hunting (i.e. not a 450gr .458" TSX on a Dik-Dik) , and is designed to expand, then I expect it to expand when it hits game at a velocity that the manufacturer claims is within the envelope of performance.


Why would anyone want to shoot a deer through the front shoulders? Trophy hunters I guess who just want to kill it for the horns and don't care about the meat. Best Of The West.
Nice deer congrats. I think the neck shot was a better shot than going through the front shoulder.[/QUOTE]
You wouldn't if it had been you out there in -30 weather chasing that deer for more than 3 hours and bashing through the willow bottoms and poplar blowdowns............
I do believe I implied the shot could have been better placed, but my 14 year old son got enamored with the antlers and made a poor shot. I don't have the bullet to check expansion, however I most certainly did witness the deers reaction and saw the minimal tissue disruption after we recovered the animal. Hitting a solid meat mass such as the neck muscle of a WT I would have expected a much larger exit hole and much greater tissue disruption than what was present, had the bullet expanded to any degree.
I made a similar shot a few years back on a similar whitetail but at 300 or so mtrs and with a 300 Wby using 200 gn Nos Parts.........sacked the deer, it got up but only moved about 40 yds and was standing with it's head drooped and unable to run or hold it's head up at all. Y'all can preach about poor shot placement, and I have to agree but that really wasn't the point of the post, the lack of damage from the poorly placed shot was what struck me as odd, not that he flubbed the shot. We who actually go out in the bush and hunt and are honest, flub shots from time to time and admit it, no news there. My thinking was, what if that bullet had hit between the ribs just back of the shoulder (which many say is the perfect shot) instead of the solid mass of a whitetails neck in rut.........how much damage would it really have done given little to no resistance, considering the minimal damage given the relatively high resistance of solid neck muscle of a rutting WT buck.
One thing I can say for sure, were he using the 230 Douglas we would have picked up the head and admired it then went over and gutted and loaded the body...........



























