so, you're saying it's acceptable for someone to sit back and videotape an animal that is suffering simply because they want footage of the critter in a leg hold trap?
i have zero issues with trapping, but i have a big problem with people that intentionally prolong the suffering of animals. if a hunter wounds an animal they're expected to finish the job asap rather than screwing around with a camera. could you please explain how this is any different.
For sure I would, but I don't have to because Paatz already did it for me..
See Below:
Animals in traps are there until they are killed by the trapper, when the trapper gets there.
They may "suffer" for quite a while. All of which is considered humane enough to be legal.
A short video is only a snapshot of reality, a reality which most people insulate themselves from, and then are "shocked" (with their "moral" self-righteous self-superiority and created indignation) when faced with it.



















































