IPSC has its own rules, that is correct. However all Local Range rules supercede the IPSC rule book. If the local range says "You cannot shoot silhouette targets" (that's just a hypothetical, I doubt very much this is an issue) then beating your chest and crying that your rule book says it's okay is not going to win you many friends on the Board of Directors.
I wasn't at the meeting when IDPA made a presentation to my club (not Poco), but I heard that there was a great deal of concern about the lack of a "180 rule" in IDPA. Our BoD expressed concern about this safety issue, especially since the pro-IDPA presenters didn't say anything to alleviate the BoD's concerns other than "The rulebook allows it".
B. Pointing muzzle beyond designated “Muzzle Safe Points”.
A 180° rule does NOT exist and will NOT be grounds for DQ.
Muzzle Safe Points for all ranges consist of “The 180”—a line parallel to the rear berm in each shooting bay, unless otherwise specified.
Thank you, Slavex, I'm doing my best here. As you say "Politics at clubs is never fun." but as you know they're in everything from Pee-Wee girls soccer on up. That's why I quit them, especially when democratic procedure is perverted by one individuals agenda.Drew, now that was a better post. I started shooting IPSC after you stopped. Currently I am president at Abby Fish and Game. I am very aware about how things work at Exec levels in clubs including Poco. Politics at clubs is never fun, IDPA is going to have to learn to play the game if they want into Poco.
If, in your range regulations, you are not allowed to do action "X", then just because it is not disallowed in the rulebook gives you no grounds to say you should be allowed to do it or to dispute that said action is not allowed at the range in question.
Sorry, you lost me there????
John
Pats, nice post
I like the way you think.
I am not privy to the inside scoop at PoCo so I can't speak to the specifics of their approach to the BoD but I would like to offer this perspective.
First, I love multigun ! I would love to see multigun take off. To that end I have put on a few multigun matches on our range in Terrace. So far trying for 2 per year. With the other disciplines shooting here, IDPA and IPSC, open weekends are limited. With that in mind.......baby steps. 2 per year and lets see how it goes.
The analogy to IDPA starting out is not perfect of course. To have a chance of taking off I would expect to see a couple of practice nights per month and hopefully a club match every month or two.....whatever the range will bear. But the point is baby steps
You may wonder why I would even give a crap what happens in PoCo for IDPA...well I will tell you. I have shot there and seen their facilities. Poco has a setup that could easily host a Provincial IDPA match. No question. A National Championship Match would also be a downstream possibility. And....now IDPA has initiated a World Champ match. The facilties I have seen would, IMO, handle any of these matches.
Obviously the income possibilities for the hosting club are bright if this could ever come to pass.
But like Pats says we have to get on 1st base before we can ever dream about a homerun.
Baby steps.......
John
I totally agree with your comment. We are not trying to take over BOD at Poco, we only want to shoot IDPA matches occasionally at Poco. Also may be one practice session a week.
To organize it requires dedicated people who can commit to spend extra time and effort for the benefit of others who may be interested in it. No one is paid for the work. Whatever money collected will be for the club i.e. Poco.
At Chilliwack, we pay $5 for the targets everytime we shoot a practice session on Wed nights. (6pm to 9pm indoor in winter and outdoors in summer) Every first Sunday of the month we have a club match. Usually seven stages.
So range time required is miminal. This is a real baby step that we are proposing at Poco. Until more people are interested and join then the requirement may change. Prime example is to think back at the beginning of IPSC.
and from what your saying about chilliwack it sounds like you dont even need to be affilited with IDPA, or even a member, and that you just want to go out and shoot the style and have some fun with others that like shooting the style ..
Is this what your saying ???
and was it really just 1st base that you wanted all along?
yes, no one is paid for the work. but you gotta know that things still need to be payed for , targets, lath, tape, batterys, timers, range repairs, prop repairs, trophys if you do that, or a BBQ if you do that. money only helps us improve what we have at the range and have more of what we need. just because PCDHFC is a non-profit club does not mean we cant have a profit on events. that profit allows us to up grade the range and structures
can always change the name to POCODPA to get started..
first base, not home run
how many do you see at a classifier and how many do you see in a club match?
same with chilliwack?
There is no "image" problem.
Whatever it's roots back in the day IDPA, as it is shot NOW, is a sport - pure and simple.
Anyone promoting IDPA or wanting to shoot IDPA because they think it will teach them how to be a gunfighter is going to be sorely disappointed.
It is a sport - period.
John
Then perhaps it was not wise to write: "IDPA is the governing body of a shooting sport that simulates self-defense scenarios and real life encounters" on the petition.
Pats
Canuck is the IDPA BC provincial head. So he knows what he is talking about. Defer all questions on representation, affiliation, rules etc to him.
He is extremely nice and level headed. Would love to have Poco to be affiliated with IDPA as this club has the best facilities to serve many shooters.
But as you said first base not home run. That was all we wanted but we felt that we were not even allowed to pick up a ball and bat to walk into the playing field, let alone play.
Then perhaps it was not wise to write: "IDPA is the governing body of a shooting sport that simulates self-defense scenarios and real life encounters" on the petition.
For a club to advertize IDPA events it must be affiliated with IDPA. New shooters interested in IDPA are allowed one shoot before membership is required by rule.
The above statement is misleading, the actual rule from page 53 of the current rule book states,
"Contestants may only shoot one IDPA match as a non-
IDPA member. Competitors wishing to shoot additional matches
must become IDPA members."
only if the shooter wishes to compete in "matches" does he have to purchase an IDPA membership, for practice nights it does not matter if you are a member or not.
just to clarify that so you do not get forced to "require" IDPA membership for non match events and so that you clearly understand the requirment.




























