I agree, but i was thinking more of the O/U like the Savagestraightshooter said:A drilling would have clear advantages over all others. I didn't think of those (and others may be in the same boat) because I don't have one. The damn thinks are so expensive and not really practical except in a situation such as the one we're hypothesizing. They'd be bloody heavy to carry and not the best suited to the job otherwise.
Thinking along those same lines, though, one of those Savage rifle over 20 guages'd be nice.
SS
Otokiak said:Well this one is for BIGREDD ...... just teasing ... but seriously if I only had one choice of rifle ... it would be my .223 Blue Star ... shot it in minus 35 degree's celsius weather the other day and nailed me a couple of tuktu(caribou)! Cheers,
Otokiak ...![]()
Rankin Inlet, NU
CANADA
![]()
Otokiak any pic's of the tuktu? Would love to see some.
Dave.
catnthehatt said:Combination gun, 12gauge/.22LR
That would kill anything you wanted it to.
Cat
You forgot to attach a hummingbird fish sonar.Rohann said:An FN-2000 with a multi-purpose launcher. Switch from a holographic sight to a scope, and switch the multi-purpose launcher with a shotgun. Or maybe a very Sop-Modded M4 (in 6mm SPC): with an M203, an Illume launcher, a shotgun attachment and a Q-D Harris bipod; a QD 10x42 Leupold M1 (on top of a Picatinny rail), an A.C.O.G Red-Dot, and a holographic sight; a QD Sound/flash suppressor, and a Q-D flashlight and laser. How's that for an "everything" rifle? (Now I know I sound like a mall ninja but I don't know too much when it comes to AR's).
-Rohann
You would think that with the Russian and yank subs secretly using our Arctic waters, that the government would put some more effort into the Rangers up north, at least newer guns and training.Canuck44 said:there's a reason why the canadian rangers are still using Lee Enfield's
Yes because the government is to cheap to give them a better rifle as in the M 16 and train them in it's function.
Stay Safe