Ultimately for me firearms are tools that must function reliably in order to complete there intended task. I have however sold other mechanical items because I was not pleased with how they looked (sold a 4Dr. Jeep XJ to buy a 2Dr. Jeep XJ, solely on looks).
Saying that if I'm choosing between two equally capable AR's for example, I would most likely be influenced by looks to make the final choice more then cost or re-sale value.
Vehicles hold a much higher standard when thinking of form and although I still will choose function over form, several times a vehicle of mine has been sold because the form was just not pleasant enough for me to keep it even it functioned admirably.
However like most mechanical workings IMO they are not attractive. Why? Well I like objects to be equal and have lines of asymmetry in order to be attractive. Like the lines on a 1980's Ferrari 308 GTSi where all is in balance and of an equalling flowing design (there are no mis-matched components side to side like there is under the hood).
Firearms, Engines and most Machines in general are not capable of maintaining this aspect due to the demands of design due to their need to function. Well at least once the Bodywork or Inspection Covers etc. are removed. Perhaps we will start seeing rifles with fancy covers to give them more of an attractive style?
I say Probably not, because they are first and foremost a tool with a specific job to do and are not built for a fashion show. Having to remove un-necessary parts in order to strip the rifle would make for an un-attractive design to those that value firearms as a tool, however others may appreciate the improvement to the visual appeal.
Are there any firearms today that have un-needed parts on them solely to improve looks?
I suppose a Flash Hider on a Ruger 10/22 could be thought of as such an item. Any comments?
