** Edited the title of the post to make it a bit more clear as the the intentions of this project and the thread. **
So here is the dilemma.
I love my rifle and the stock it is sitting in... a Remington 700 MLR chambered for .338LM, resting in an HS-Precision stock. (This was her a long time ago...)

I now have the NF optic and SPUHR scope mount I wanted for this rifle, and have been getting good results as I work on building the rifle into what works for me.
Now, with the optic and rings combo, proper cheek weld is not possible, as the comfortable line of sight leaves the comb of the stock 3/4" under the proper part of my cheek.
Thanks to attending one of Hungry's Precision rifle seminars, I learned just how far off comfortable cheek weld I really was.
I already had one of the velcro on side bag cheek risers, which raised it by about 1/4", so at the course all the students adjusted their cheek weld with some home brew gunsmithing in the form of foam padding and duct tape. Instant, and surprisingly large improvement in the comfort of the cheek weld while sitting behind the gun for extended periods.
Now I am on the hunt for a more permanent solution to get the cheek piece to the right height.
I hate the Kydex style bolt on cheek risers. They have exposed bolts, nooks, and crannies that will snag on everything in sight while packing the rifles thorough thick brush, which I do frequently with this rifle. I will not be considering this style whatsoever.
Kydex style...
The only viable style that suits my needs seems to be an internal adjustable cheek rising mechanism.
There were a bunch of benchrest style ones, which have an exposed thumbwheel, but I don't like exposed stuff that can be adjusted accidentally.
I stumbled across a website during my search with a product that seemed perfect... The Loggerhead cheek riser. (Their website is partially under construction, so it is unfinished)
The guts of it are simple too, not much to go wrong... basically you have a professional cut and inlet your stock for the hardware, and it sits completely inside the stock. It is adjustable with a single allen key, and has E clips to save your preferred height when removing the comb to remove the bolt of the rifle.
I have been chatting with the owner of the company back and forth via email, Terry Cross, and he is very helpful describing his product and why it was designed.
I picked one up, as they are very affordable, only $50.00 US... and was just curious if anybody had any similar experiences or insight with this product or similar ones, and what your opinion would be on the suitability of the HS-precision stock for this product. (If I don't use it on this rifle I will on a custom build later anyways)
I have thus far been unable to get any answer from anybody about the inside of HS-precision stocks... as to if they are hollow or solid. (I assume solid, but don't exactly want to have a pro cut into an expensive stock before confirming this.
Anyways, I will keep you guys updated as this goes on, but was just curious about your opinions on this topic.
Cheers, and sorry for the long winded post.
So here is the dilemma.
I love my rifle and the stock it is sitting in... a Remington 700 MLR chambered for .338LM, resting in an HS-Precision stock. (This was her a long time ago...)

I now have the NF optic and SPUHR scope mount I wanted for this rifle, and have been getting good results as I work on building the rifle into what works for me.
Now, with the optic and rings combo, proper cheek weld is not possible, as the comfortable line of sight leaves the comb of the stock 3/4" under the proper part of my cheek.
Thanks to attending one of Hungry's Precision rifle seminars, I learned just how far off comfortable cheek weld I really was.
I already had one of the velcro on side bag cheek risers, which raised it by about 1/4", so at the course all the students adjusted their cheek weld with some home brew gunsmithing in the form of foam padding and duct tape. Instant, and surprisingly large improvement in the comfort of the cheek weld while sitting behind the gun for extended periods.
Now I am on the hunt for a more permanent solution to get the cheek piece to the right height.
I hate the Kydex style bolt on cheek risers. They have exposed bolts, nooks, and crannies that will snag on everything in sight while packing the rifles thorough thick brush, which I do frequently with this rifle. I will not be considering this style whatsoever.
Kydex style...

The only viable style that suits my needs seems to be an internal adjustable cheek rising mechanism.
There were a bunch of benchrest style ones, which have an exposed thumbwheel, but I don't like exposed stuff that can be adjusted accidentally.


I stumbled across a website during my search with a product that seemed perfect... The Loggerhead cheek riser. (Their website is partially under construction, so it is unfinished)



The guts of it are simple too, not much to go wrong... basically you have a professional cut and inlet your stock for the hardware, and it sits completely inside the stock. It is adjustable with a single allen key, and has E clips to save your preferred height when removing the comb to remove the bolt of the rifle.
I have been chatting with the owner of the company back and forth via email, Terry Cross, and he is very helpful describing his product and why it was designed.
I picked one up, as they are very affordable, only $50.00 US... and was just curious if anybody had any similar experiences or insight with this product or similar ones, and what your opinion would be on the suitability of the HS-precision stock for this product. (If I don't use it on this rifle I will on a custom build later anyways)
I have thus far been unable to get any answer from anybody about the inside of HS-precision stocks... as to if they are hollow or solid. (I assume solid, but don't exactly want to have a pro cut into an expensive stock before confirming this.
Anyways, I will keep you guys updated as this goes on, but was just curious about your opinions on this topic.
Cheers, and sorry for the long winded post.
Last edited: