redbirddog
CGN frequent flyer
- Location
- Maple Syrup land Ontario
John is more of a somebody than a 4 post count nobody...
Sweet! Just what I was thinking!
John is more of a somebody than a 4 post count nobody...
John was the IPSC rep for Barrie.
John is more of a somebody than a 4 post count nobody...
I guess that went right over your head.
Read it again, the whole thing, and this time see if you can get the Sarcasm.
I was in a rush, very well sarcastic! I'll give you that!I guess that went right over your head.
Read it again, the whole thing, and this time see if you can get the Sarcasm.
Dear BOD IPSC ON, can you please let us know as soon as possible what is going on and where we gonna have ON Provincials?
Also, how a man who didn't RO any matches can be allow to be Head of NROI?
What are the merits to become a Head of NROI?
John was the IPSC rep for Barrie.
John is more of a somebody than a 4 post count nobody...
Mark Hamrol is the head of NROI...and has more than enough experience.
Agreed...just wondering why it's been taken down![]()
I am just speculating, but I think it has been taken down while the BOD is re-working and/or preparing our constitution for final review and voting on by our membership.
This WHOLE EPISODE has nothing but bad optics......
I am just speculating, but I think it has been taken down while the BOD is re-working and/or preparing our constitution for final review and voting on by our membership.
Was there ever a vote of the membership to approve the 1996 version. I can't remember voting except for the new BOD. There is nothing in the Sitreps for 1996 that alludes to a new constitution as far as I can tell. Maybe it should be the 1997 version or the version that was never ratified by the membership.
Maybe MrClean can shed some light on the subject as he was elected to the BOD at the end 0f '96.
Hello Everyone,
I have been contacted by a number of people about what is going in this thread.
I have no idea. I only learned about what was happening by this thread on the forum.
I will be speaking with the SC this evening.
I do not want to comment or make any decisions until I have spoken to the people involved.
DVC
There is nothing in the Sitreps for 1996 that alludes to a new constitution as far as I can tell. .
Just when I thought that things could not get worse..............
Now we find out that we have a member who....
KEEPS HIS SITREPS FOR DECADES!!!!
The humanity!!
Was there ever a vote of the membership to approve the 1996 version. I can't remember voting except for the new BOD. There is nothing in the Sitreps for 1996 that alludes to a new constitution as far as I can tell. Maybe it should be the 1997 version or the version that was never ratified by the membership.
Maybe MrClean can shed some light on the subject as he was elected to the BOD at the end 0f '96.
)It's really a mute point this many years later. I doubt any BOD would move forward based on someones recolection of what may or may not have happened 14 years ago.
It's the only complete and credible version we were able to find and we had to make a judgement call (ahem...perhaps you fine folks should have addressed this a decade ago.)
That being said, your current BOD is refreshing the constitution...



























