Is it necessary to "Break in" a new gun

Bullets with lapping compound on them are for poor quality barrels that shoot like crap to start with...and may not improve but you have nothing to lose... I would never consider using them in anything I would own.
 
I think it's that huge variance in barrels that makes the case for break in.....the next one you get could be the one that needs it.

I read somewhere that Savage maintains the barrel cutting equipment a little better and monitors the accuracy ongoing, when it starts to show near the limits of Q.C they change them.
 
Did you read Lijas article on what occurs when you fire a round, on how copper is vaporized and deposited in the bore? Do you have an opinion about what he says?

Indeed. Opinions don't matter. Even opinions from experts (remember when experts said Thalidomide, asbestos, and Urea Formaldehyde Foam Insulation was safe) Evidence does. What I do have is a borescope and many pieces of paper with holes in them. I used to break-in religiously. then I didn't. The borescope tells me that it takes no effort at all to get rid of copper from a custom lapped barrel, if it builds up at all - with or without break-in. It is molecules thick and it is easy to eliminate. Carbon takes a bit more effort if it builds up, but in the end there is no difference between breaking-in and not. Dan Lilja has a vested interest in selling you barrels, so the faster you can wear them out, the better. I'd waste up to 10%+ of an overbore cartridge barrel life if I believed in the break in theory. To each his own
 
Dan Lilja has a vested interest in selling you barrels, so the faster you can wear them out, the better. I'd waste up to 10%+ of an overbore cartridge barrel life if I believed in the break in theory. To each his own

Considering it only takes a few shots to break a match grade barrel in if one were to do so, those few shots can also be used to adjust a scope, check pressure signs... I seriously doubt those few shots would have reduced barrel life by any amount you can measure.

Any one who thinks a barrel maker is going to sell more barrels because someone might wear a barrel out by cleaning it between shots a few times early in it's life is out to lunch... a barrel maker will sell more barrels if his product consistently performs well...
 
Not to mention its been stated multiple times by multiple members that break-in is much less necessary with nicely lapped match barrels and usually most beneficial to factory offerings. There is no answer to "is it necessary?" There are multiple answers depending on exactly which barrel we are talking about. If its a little rough then a break-in can improve its performance. If its lapped you won't see as big of a difference, if any. That's the whole point to lapping, it wouldn't be done if those burrs were acceptable. Break-in helps finish that step depending on how much work the bore still needs. I do it anyways and let the rifle tell me what's going on. Its over quick then its shoot till she opens up, clean, repeat.
 
Indeed. Opinions don't matter. Even opinions from experts (remember when experts said Thalidomide, asbestos, and Urea Formaldehyde Foam Insulation was safe) Evidence does. What I do have is a borescope and many pieces of paper with holes in them. I used to break-in religiously. then I didn't. The borescope tells me that it takes no effort at all to get rid of copper from a custom lapped barrel, if it builds up at all - with or without break-in. It is molecules thick and it is easy to eliminate. Carbon takes a bit more effort if it builds up, but in the end there is no difference between breaking-in and not. Dan Lilja has a vested interest in selling you barrels, so the faster you can wear them out, the better. I'd waste up to 10%+ of an overbore cartridge barrel life if I believed in the break in theory. To each his own
Thats what I figured as well.
 
Breaking in your guns is very important but don't do it yourself!!! Send all your guns to a professional "gunner breaker inner" like me and I will shoot thousands of rounds through them. When you get them back, they will be thoroughly broken in. Some may even be just plain "broken".:evil:
 
Breaking in your guns is very important but don't do it yourself!!! Send all your guns to a professional "gunner breaker inner" like me and I will shoot thousands of rounds through them. When you get them back, they will be thoroughly broken in. Some may even be just plain "broken".:evil:

Your on the list..:evil:
 
Most of your top guys take a lot of care to break in and clean their barrels , having said that there is a variance mostly based on past experience . some shoot one clean one for the first five while fire forming then shoot groups of five rounds to finish fire forming and call it good , others will shoot one and clean for the first 15-20 rounds depending on how the patches look ,after its broke in clean every 7-20 rounds , the groups will tell you when to clean . Is it a gun to be used in benchrest or a gun your going to use to shoot from a bench ? I have never seen a savage in a registered bench shoot or a .223 , most bench guns are 6ppc .
 
Suggest going to Krieger barrels(heard of them) and read their explanation as to why break-in is recommended. Only guntech and those agreeing with him are on track.

Regards,

Peter
 
Well my buddy and I may have sacrificed a brand new Savage 10 FCP HS Precision in the name of this thread today. We threw the scope on and said to hell with breaking it in and set about firing 60 straight rounds thru it. And guess what? The first 3 rounds were touching at 100m and the 58th 59th and 60th rounds were touching at 100m. A lot of blue on the patches at the end but nothing out to left field. Any thoughts?
 
Dan Lilja believes in barrel break-in, the folks at Shilen do not, Krieger does, Bartlein does not, Hart does, and so on. If even the top barrel makers in the world cannot agree on it, I doubt that we will settle it here on an internet forum.
 
For the sake of me i can't find this article on Lilja's website. Anyone got a link.

EDIT** Nevermind found it on KRIEGER'S website.

It's about barrel fouling...
http://www.riflebarrels.com/articles/barrel_making/barrel_fouling.htm

Part of it - It is important to break-in a barrel though. The jacket material must be removed after every shot during the initial few rounds. If this isn't done the areas of the barrel that fouled will tend to pick up more fouling and it will build on itself. It is important to get a layer of powder fouling on top of the lands & grooves. This hard deposit will prevent the copper from stripping off the bullets. However, if the internal finish of the barrel is too rough the barrel will never be completely broken-in and fouling will always be a problem. Some barrels can't be broken-in.
 
Well my buddy and I may have sacrificed a brand new Savage 10 FCP HS Precision in the name of this thread today. We threw the scope on and said to hell with breaking it in and set about firing 60 straight rounds thru it. And guess what? The first 3 rounds were touching at 100m and the 58th 59th and 60th rounds were touching at 100m. A lot of blue on the patches at the end but nothing out to left field. Any thoughts?

My thoughts,

The copper will continue to build up and eventually will need to be completely removed as your accuracy will drop off... and then you start over...

A barrel that is broken in will most likely not have copper build up as much, and not need to be stripped clean as often, resulting in more predictable uniform accuracy over a longer period of time.
 
Suggest going to Krieger barrels(heard of them) and read their explanation as to why break-in is recommended. Only guntech and those agreeing with him are on track.

Regards,

Peter

Yes they want you to "break in" a barrel because it induces more wear on it. In turn makes you buy more barrels. I think I read that exact line on 6mmbr. The barrel makers are in it for making money just like every other business. If they can get a little more they will tell you whatever you want to listen to.


My thoughts,

The copper will continue to build up and eventually will need to be completely removed as your accuracy will drop off... and then you start over...

A barrel that is broken in will most likely not have copper build up as much, and not need to be stripped clean as often, resulting in more predictable uniform accuracy over a longer period of time.


When I got my savage 223 I just shot the hell out of it. To the point sometimes you couldnt touch the barrel even. The first time I cleaned it was after 1500 rounds ish. I was bored one night so cleaned it although it still shot the same as day one. Now about 3000 rounds through it and still shoots like day one. There still isnt ever any copper in it. Never even heard of barrel break in until I came on here. Never heard of anyone ever doing a special process except "get 3 boxes of ammo, go to a gravel pit and blast away."
If break in is so special youd think more people would know about it or have some proof that its more then a fairy tail.
 
Well my buddy and I may have sacrificed a brand new Savage 10 FCP HS Precision in the name of this thread today. We threw the scope on and said to hell with breaking it in and set about firing 60 straight rounds thru it. And guess what? The first 3 rounds were touching at 100m and the 58th 59th and 60th rounds were touching at 100m. A lot of blue on the patches at the end but nothing out to left field. Any thoughts?

I think you answered your own question, just shoot it, enjoy, and clean it when your done.
 
Back
Top Bottom