That 156 Sako Deerhead bonded core bullet in a 6.5x55 sounds like perfect moose and elk medicine. It's a damn shame we can't get the unloaded bullets in Canada for handloading. My substitute (not yet tried on game) is the Lapua 155-gr. Mega. QuickLoad indicates that 2750 fps with safe pressure in the 6.5x55 is possible with the slower-burning powders. Lapua advertises this bullet as "mechanically bonded," which I think is less preferable than chemical bonding, but may be fine. The problem with heavy 6.5 mm. bullets like the Sako Deerhead and Lapua Mega is poor ballistic coefficient--.344 reported for the Sako and .377 for the Lapua—so I’d limit range to 300 yards and under, I think. The standard advice re minimum retained energy for moose and elk is 1500 ft. lbs. (I’m not sure just how relevant retained energy is re killing power, but those are the suggestions.) The 155-gr. Lapua Mega at 2750 fps MV retains 1476 ft. lbs. at 300 yards and retains greater than the 2000 fps often cited as necessary for adequate expansion of soft-point bullets.I had a Sig Cross in 6.5 Creedmoor in the rotation this year for black bears. No qualms about driving the 156g Sako bonded soft point into one at 100 yards. Would work fine on moose and elk as well I imagine. I only ever shot deer with my 6.5x55mm but many pass throughs with the 140gr partition. Nice exit holes, no real tracking that I can recall. I prefer a bit more for moose or elk on the other side of the Pembina valley but that's a "me" thing.
I had a Sig Cross in 6.5 Creedmoor in the rotation this year for black bears. No qualms about driving the 156g Sako bonded soft point into one at 100 yards. Would work fine on moose and elk as well I imagine. I only ever shot deer with my 6.5x55mm but many pass throughs with the 140gr partition. Nice exit holes, no real tracking that I can recall. I prefer a bit more for moose or elk on the other side of the Pembina valley but that's a "me" thing.
That 156 Sako Deerhead bonded core bullet in a 6.5x55 sounds like perfect moose and elk medicine. It's a damn shame we can't get the unloaded bullets in Canada for handloading. My substitute (not yet tried on game) is the Lapua 155-gr. Mega. QuickLoad indicates that 2750 fps with safe pressure in the 6.5x55 is possible with the slower-burning powders. Lapua advertises this bullet as "mechanically bonded," which I think is less preferable than chemical bonding, but may be fine. The problem with heavy 6.5 mm. bullets like the Sako Deerhead and Lapua Mega is poor ballistic coefficient--.344 reported for the Sako and .377 for the Lapua—so I’d limit range to 300 yards and under, I think. The standard advice re minimum retained energy for moose and elk is 1500 ft. lbs. (I’m not sure just how relevant retained energy is re killing power, but those are the suggestions.) The 155-gr. Lapua Mega at 2750 fps MV retains 1476 ft. lbs. at 300 yards and retains greater than the 2000 fps often cited as necessary for adequate expansion of soft-point bullets.
Edit. There is also the Norma ORYX 6.5mm. 156 gr. Bonded Soft Point, which is available in Canada for handloading. It has a similar BC (.348) to the Sako and Lapua bullets. Should be a winner in the 6.5x55 on the heaviest game, but is expensive ($144 per 100 at present).
Can anyone report on how the Barnes 6.5 mm 127gr LRX perform on big game, Deer to Moose? Thank you, WK
Another heavy bullet for the 6.5x55 that might be the best of all for moose and elk is the 6.5mm Woodleigh 160-gr. PPSN (protected point, soft nose). As reported on the Woodleigh website, this bullet, with a bonded core, has a phenomenal BC of .509 with its streamlined spitzer form (Woodleigh also makes a 6.5mm round nose in the same weight), rather than the round-nose form of most heavy 6.5mm bullets. According to QuickLoad, 2700 fps MV with safe pressure is possible with the right slow-burning powder from my 23.5" barrel. This gives it a flatter trajectory than most 6.5mm heavyweights. Sighted to be +3.0" at 100 yards, it is down only about 11.5" at 350 yards and retains 1572 ft. lbs. of energy. With its great sectional density of .328, it should penetrate deeply and kill reliably out to 350 yards if put in the right place.
That's really interesting, Tod. It certainly changes the downrange potential of the 160 Woodleigh. A true BC of around .40 is still something of an improvement over the other high-end 6.5mm 160s (the Lapua and Norma). Do you have some Labradar doppler results for those two?based on Labradar doppler retained downrange velocity from two different 6.5 PRC rifles, the actual BC is between .388 & .409 G1
I emailed Woodleigh and asked how they determine their BC and they said "our BC are calculations only, based on charts supplied by Dupont many years ago. Approximates only"
Me favorite bullet for the 6.5 Swede is the Hornady 160 gr RN Interlock pushed out at 2300 fps using IMR 4831.
I've used this bullet for deer & black bear with fine results & would not worry about moose & big bears out to 100 yds or so.
https://www.hornady.com/bullets/rifle/6-5mm-264-160-gr-interlock-rn#!/#specs
Me favorite bullet for the 6.5 Swede is the Hornady 160 gr RN Interlock pushed out at 2300 fps using IMR 4831.
I've used this bullet for deer & black bear with fine results & would not worry about moose & big bears out to 100 yds or so.
https://www.hornady.com/bullets/rifle/6-5mm-264-160-gr-interlock-rn#!/#specs
Been trying to find these with no luck. I heard they work good in the carcano rifles too