Is The SAI Sterling R18 MKII Worth The Extra Cost?

Did some more testing last weekend of April - this time to develop a few loads with the abundance of Ramshot TAC I have on hand that were dialled down in powder as I was popping primers with my existing batch of hand loads. TAC is a fairly fine ball powder that is supposedly good with heavier .224 bullets - so 65gr. and up. The Stainless Steel Armalite barrel appears to be a fairly tight chambered .223; supposition on my part based on the pressure signs I'm seeing with the ammo I'm shooting through it.

IMG_5744 by M J, on Flickr

IMG_5747 by M J, on Flickr

All of the 68 and 69 grain stuff was mediocre producing ~2.5", 10 round groups.


I have a significant amount of 55gr. flat based AMAX on hand so did up some of that to see how it would do:

IMG_5746 by M J, on Flickr

IMG_5745 by M J, on Flickr

The last group with 23.0gr of TAC seems promising, and worth pursuing if i wasn't going to be shooting much further than a couple a hundred meters, but I need to stretch this out to 500m.

Next day I took the remainder of the hand loads varying in charge weight of tac, bullet types (68gr Hornady HPBTs & 69gr. SMKs), and primers (Winchester WSRs and Federal 205ms) down and shot a Service Rifle match in Taber.
The R18 performed well, even if my come-ups and wind calls were messed up and bouncing around :)

Took it home and did a stripping and cleaning - this with around 600 rounds through it:

IMG_5736 by M J, on Flickr

Not sure if the above is indicative of normal wear, but this is the portion where I believe the bolt cam pin comes into contact with the upper receiver. I'll be keeping an eye on this area.

IMG_5739 by M J, on Flickr

The firing pin shoulder that is up against the firing pin retaining pin is showing some adverse wear, in my mind - I'll keep an eye on this area too.

Lastly, considering the amount of hand loads I have for my other service rigs, I figured it was time to spin on a different barrel - this one a chrome lined 7 twist Colt H-Bar. Only a few more ounces over the other two Sterling and Armalite barrels who were both just shy of 3 lbs each... This one just over 3lbs.

IMG_5741 by M J, on Flickr
 
Also curious to see how that HBAR performs. Honestly, those 68 and 69gr loads aren't too shabby, just a hair over 1 moa. Shouldn't be any issues pushing that to 500m+. Are you gonna try any 75/77s? I usually jump straight to those for any kinda longer range .223 stuff. The BC bump compared to the 68/69s gives you a decent advantage at distance.

You've got me seriously contemplating one of these, haha.
 
I typically shoot the 68s and 69s to 300m and 77SMKs 400 & 500m. However, the 69s can be pushed to higher velocities than the 77s, so for our Service Rifle game, I don't think it really matters too much.
 
Shot on the weekend of May 11, 2023 and put another ~150 rounds through it.
The Colt Hbar was predictably more forgiving of my existing warm hand loads and increased firing schedule / tempo.

As with the other testing, groups are 10 rounds in around a minute.

Of the existing hand loads I tried, the most consistent were the 77smk over 24.0 grains of Varget. The 205m and WSR primers seemed to give similar performance with respect to grouping.
Once I have chewed through my existing SR handloads, I'll probably work up a load specific for this rifle.

100m:

IMG_0157 by M J, on Flickr

100m:

IMG_0156 by M J, on Flickr

Targets 8 & 5 overlay (20 rounds into 2 1/4" @ 100m:

IMG_0158 by M J, on Flickr

300m Prone monopod'ing off a magazine - 10 rounds into 9.5" (2.75 moa) with wind rear quartering full value right to left (Milo) Holding for dope half way middle to right edge of target.

IMG_0160 by M J, on Flickr
 
Back
Top Bottom