pete dobinson
CGN frequent flyer
- Location
- Courtenay BC.
I have an EW and yes mine has the same machine marks, maybe not quite as deep. My rifle is chambered in 7-08 and I'm thinking about re-barreling to 284 win.
Sure sounds to me like you've been unhappy with the poor finish on your particular rifle for some time and you're making yourself feel better by posting a tirade.
You can proclaim your brand loyalty all you like but at the end of the day it wouldn't matter if those marks were on a "Remchester" or a "Rugerby"... they look like hell.
As to your advice to the OP not to worry about the marks, he must ask himself, am I a "couch surfer" who expects a certain level of fit and finish from a 1500$ rifle or a "meat harvester" who is above such aesthetic nonsense?
Either way I'm sure the rifle shoots just fine.
That's how every Ruger looks. Laughing.
These marks are common to varying degree and I don't pay much mind to them: The Model 70 is still my favourite centrefire rifle. I would spend an extra $50 to $100 to see perfect work. Most others won't, as proven by myriad quality rifles discontinued because consumers vote for cheap and cheesy far too often.
Save up. Spend the extra on quality and enjoy the ride.
You can stone and polish metal work on a good action. I'm not sure what can be done with a Savage.




























