Israeli M1 carbines - making a silk purse of a sow's ear?

Claven2

CGN Ultra frequent flyer
Rating - 100%
404   0   2
Location
Onterrible
So I'm starting my own thread on the Israeli M1 carbines I recently picked up from CGN dealers and will do some updating here on what I actually got, and what I'm doing with them.

As a recap, the first rifle was a full wood Inland. I had ordered it requesting to not get an M2 stock, but of course they shipped it with the rattiest M2 stock I'd ever held. Luckily, I'm not new to restoring military wood stocks (actually I have a LOT of experience with that...), and I was able to make it passable. Despite being an M2 stock, it was actually a walnut M2 lower made by Winchester with a sub-contractor-produced 2 rivet walnut handguard, and while I am unsure if it will stay on the rifle, it was worth restoring.

So the first rifle turned out to be a Dec 43 or Jan 44-produced Inland (4.88M, start of this production block, with 12-43 barrel) that definitely went through a thorough post-war rebuild. It left the factory with a flip sight (I can see the old locating chisel marks) and got a stamped adjustable sight post-war. The only real Inland parts still present are the receiver, rear sight (made by an Inland sub-contractor, even if it did not come on this rifle when it was new), and the slide (which will need the tab re-welded soon, I think). Lieterally every other part was from another manufacturer, which is not so uncommon for a refurb. The serial number was re-stamped forward of the sight, common on earlier receivers that were refurbished, as the new rear sights obscured the original placement of serial numbers.

Here are some shots of it after I restored the stock and cleaned up the metal:

dIyje39.jpg

TVrSf9u.jpg

WgPIBbL.jpg


Plans for this one (noting the second rifle I ordered is, in my view, nicer and worth preserving), is to install a new criterion non-restricted barrel, convert to push-button safety (I'm left handed), replace the Type 3 barrel band with a Type 2 band (I have a couple of them in the spares bin), replace the stamped rear sight with a better milled inland sight (which would have been used intermittently at the factory in this serial number range). I also have some correct inland parts on hand I'll likely install, just because, including a correct inland trigger group & housing, and an inland dished bolt which the rifle would still have had in Jan 44.

I should mention of course, I do have the correct chamber reamer, receiver and barrel wrench and vise, rear sight pusher, front sight puller, etc. I used to work on these guns a lot, years back. So apart from the barrel (which I have on order), this isn't a massive investment, and it will make this mixmaster much more useful to me.

I'm debating whether to get the parts that need it re-parkerized at Vulcan (I can't do manganese phosphating here) - sadly Nick;s prices have gone way up in recent years, so on the fence here.

I may also install a new Dupage walnut oval-cut low-wall stock. I have one here, and if I go the re-park route, this would make more sense. Thinking about it.

On to rifle No.2...

Rifle No.2 was ordered as a random choate sporter Israeli gun, mostly to see if what turned up would be any better than the first gun, and these are also a couple hundred cheaper. Bought from a different dealer, with no requests - so it was a total roll of the dice. I was pleasantly surprised. The gun that turned up was, predictably, an Inland - it seems all the dealers have inlands left, but really nothing else.

But despite the choate stock, this one turned out to be a non-refurb with a few armorer upgrades dumped into a plastic stock. 5.2M range, making it around a June 1944 gun with a 5-44 barrel. Every part on the gun is correct, and Inland made or a correct Inland sub-contractor. All the parts that are supposed to be blued, still are, and all the parts supposed to be in the white still are. It's not even parked at the chamber mouth or under the front sight. A rather lucky find, I think. Having researched everything, all that's been done to the gun since it was made was:

-put in choate stock with a random Standard Products recoil plate
-button safety changed to flip
-type 2 band changed to type 3 (but an Inland one, at least). Type 3 bands didn't leave the factory until around December 44, so it's definitely not original.

Photos as it arrived:

w7Afxcq.jpg

TKw47Bx.jpg

gvSS3IW.jpg

xrJsk5Z.jpg


This gun is lower mileage than the first gun I ordered above, and has much less finish wear. It has a correct for June 44 stamped rear sight with original factory staking. Definitely worth some minor restoration, so I went looking for appropriate wood and found a dirty, but promising looking mid-44 inland stock set for sale (HI lower and OI handguard). Pic of it as it arrived, almost black with who knows what oil, storage grunge, etc.:

XWLhp12.jpeg


It cleaned up pretty nice - it's a correct, un-sanded stock for this gun in this serial range, HI cartouche in the sling recess, IO clearly stamped on the HG. It definitely saw service and has the tasteful dings and bruises to prove it. P proof on the face of the pistol grip. This isn't the best photo, but trust me, in hand it looks really good.

Iv8SXsm.jpeg


Some random shots of a few of the parts:

2bULh9J.jpeg

7mFM1IP.jpeg


I'm planning to put it back into as-built configuration. I've already cleaned it all up and re-installed a correct Inland button safety. I need to dig through the bins to find an Inland Type 2 band I know I have but that has proven elusive to find yet, then it'll be back together for some glam shots. I've definitely decided to keep this one restricted - it's too nice to re-barrel I think.

So that's where things stand. I had forgotten how much I liked working on these things and shooting them, to be honest. I had sold off my last M1 carbine years ago, perhaps stupidly.

I'd buy another at this point, except all I can find for sale are either more Inlands (I don't need another!) or dealers saying they won't hand pick manufacturers. If anyone has a cheap isreali folder from another maker they regret buying, let me know what it is. I might just be interested (I have enough parts to convert a couple more back to GI anyhow)...

If anyone else hass some before and after shots of their Israeli surplus carbines, post some shots here!
 
As an aside - while the sample size is small, I have a theory that many of the better condition carbines are the ones the Israelis selected for the choate folders - which I suspect were in active use later than the wood stocked guns. The few people I've talked to have also noticed the folders are often in better condition than the wood stocked guns, despite their lower prices at dealers.

Just a theory that has borne out in my small sample size and the few other guys I've discussed these with.
 
Both my Inlands came with the wooden stock with Israeli stock markings. When I was on leave as a UN Peacekeeper in 1976 & 1978, in Israel , what I noticed was that everyone carrying the wooden stock version at that time was a civilian and the police carried the folding stock version. I also have a Winchester with what I believe is a "pot belly" stock that is wider than those on the Inland which I just can't get used too.

You are correct, it is a exceptionally fun and enjoyable firearm to shoot. I'm using one of the Inlands in a local 3 gun match this coming Saturday.
 
That makes sense. Firstly the police likely had someone maintaining the guns regularly, like an armorer. The civilians might have gotten the rougher guns to begin with, potentially shot them more than the police, and on average likely did not maintain them as well.

M2 stocks are definitely more robust to deal with automatic fire, but un-necessarily so for semi auto. I much prefer the slimmer m1 stock profile.
 
Claven2, do you have a source for M1 Carbine spare parts in Canada, as bringing in parts from the US is getting more and more difficult as time goes by.
 
Nice work Claven!

Are you going to leave the bayonet lug off?

Definitely leaving it off. M1 carbines were not built with type 3 bands until November 1944, and only Winchester and inland guns are verified to have left the factory with these type 3 bands.

Moreover, if the P firing proof on the barrel is covered by the bayonet lug shroud, that rifle definitely left the factory with no bayonet lug.

Type 2 bands were showing up on rifles from Jan 44 to about Nov 44. Prior to that they had type 1 bands.

I really have no use for a type 3 band on a non- restricted carbine as you can’t mount the bayonet, or on a correct pre-Nov 44 carbine that didn’t have one to begin with.
 
Definitely leaving it off. M1 carbines were not built with type 3 bands until November 1944, and only Winchester and inland guns are verified to have left the factory with these type 3 bands.

Moreover, if the P firing proof on the barrel is covered by the bayonet lug shroud, that rifle definitely left the factory with no bayonet lug.

Type 2 bands were showing up on rifles from Jan 44 to about Nov 44. Prior to that they had type 1 bands.

I really have no use for a type 3 band on a non- restricted carbine as you can’t mount the bayonet, or on a correct pre-Nov 44 carbine that didn’t have one to begin with.

Makes little sense on a longer barrel that's for sure, I was unaware that they were ever issued without the ability to run a bayonet.

It looks cleaner without it and if you ever need a bayonet mount it's not like you can't put it back on.... :)
 
I wish these were non restricted, they always interested me. A handy compact rifle is always a nice thing.

A lot of people do their shooting at a range so an RPAL and ATT facilitate this. Long and far away before M1 Carbines became restricted I only used mine for casual plinking. They were too little for deer and didn't compare with .22LR costs for rabbits, etc.
 
A lot of people do their shooting at a range so an RPAL and ATT facilitate this. Long and far away before M1 Carbines became restricted I only used mine for casual plinking. They were too little for deer and didn't compare with .22LR costs for rabbits, etc.

Honestly, I think that's only an issue with FMJ ammo.

30 carbine out of a 18" barrel is more powerful in terms of terminal energy than a .357 MAG out of a 6" handgun, yet LOTS of people in the states hunt close-range deer with scoped .357 handguns.

Using a decent soft point, I would not hesitate to shoot a deer with one under 100 yards.

It's amazing to me how many people think you need a big magnum round to kill a deer - they are really no more bullet resistant than a human.

Lots of people also think you can't or shouldn't hunt deer with cartridges such as 44-40, 351 WSL, 32 Special, 357 MAG, etc., and that you need something like 30-06, 7mm mag or even 338 Lapua to kill these animals - which is just crazy.

More deer have been killed with 30-30 and .44-40 in Canada than perhaps anything but maybe 303 British.

Here's a good breakdown of 357 vs 30 carbine:

and one on the effectiveness of 30 carbine on living things:

FMJ rounds would likely punch all the way through a deer and be ineffective unless you hit vitals, but you'd have to have rocks in the head to hunt with FMJ ;)

All this being said, I don't hunt deer with 30 carbine - I own lots of better tools for the job - but I did used to carry around an NR one for things like porcupine, coyotes, etc. and likely will again when one of mine gets an 18.75" barrel.
 
Definitely leaving it off. M1 carbines were not built with type 3 bands until November 1944, and only Winchester and inland guns are verified to have left the factory with these type 3 bands.

Moreover, if the P firing proof on the barrel is covered by the bayonet lug shroud, that rifle definitely left the factory with no bayonet lug.

Type 2 bands were showing up on rifles from Jan 44 to about Nov 44. Prior to that they had type 1 bands.

I really have no use for a type 3 band on a non- restricted carbine as you can’t mount the bayonet, or on a correct pre-Nov 44 carbine that didn’t have one to begin with.

You sure? My 499###xx Inland was built between Jan-Aug 44 and has a Type 3.
 
yes, I'm VERY sure (per the Larry Ruth's War Baby reference books, he had access to the actual manufacturing records).

Virtually all M1 carbines in US hands after 1945 were retrofitted with type 3 bands, flip safeties, and adjustable rear sights. This did not necessarily mean that the rifle was refurbished, many were just modified at unit armorer levels as it's not a difficult upgrade.

Those that escaped the mods were generally in service elsewhere, like the Bundeswehr, France, the UK, etc.

That said, if you like the bayonet lug, by all means keep it installed. In many ways it's a nod to how the rifle left service and perfectly fine to have them. I just elected to not use one on my particular rifle.
 
yes, I'm VERY sure (per the Larry Ruth's War Baby reference books, he had access to the actual manufacturing records).

Virtually all M1 carbines in US hands after 1945 were retrofitted with type 3 bands, flip safeties, and adjustable rear sights. This did not necessarily mean that the rifle was refurbished, many were just modified at unit armorer levels as it's not a difficult upgrade.

Those that escaped the mods were generally in service elsewhere, like the Bundeswehr, France, the UK, etc.

That said, if you like the bayonet lug, by all means keep it installed. In many ways it's a nod to how the rifle left service and perfectly fine to have them. I just elected to not use one on my particular rifle.

Mine must be a refurb. I got a flip safety, adjustable rear, m2 potbelly stock, the type 3.
 
Mine must be a refurb. I got a flip safety, adjustable rear, m2 potbelly stock, the type 3.

Israeli? Almost certainly a refurb. The M2 stocks are all post war, wartime M2’s initially just used modified m1 stocks. Potbelly came later to reduce stock cracking issues in full auto fire. Just after ww2.
 
Back
Top Bottom