It seems Type 81 is coming

The proof is that they can not be bought, that prohibits us from owning one. Same thing with the 958.
bbbls.gif
 
The proof is that they can not be bought, that prohibits us from owning one. Same thing with the 958.

You might want to stop talking as you are totally wrong. Both of these have not been classified yet. Anyone who says one or the other is speculating.
 
It stands Prohibited. :)

Oh ya right. That is why tvpresspass got one (a 958) to do a review. His video has him out on crown land shooting it.

It is non restricted. As per the reasons stated in his video. An frt entry doesn't classify a gun, it lists the Mountie opinion as to what the classification is under law. The law classifies guns.

Go educate yourself. Seriously.
 
Oh ya right. That is why tvpresspass got one (a 958) to do a review. His video has him out on crown land shooting it.

It is non restricted. As per the reasons stated in his video. An frt entry doesn't classify a gun, it lists the Mountie opinion as to what the classification is under law. The law classifies guns.

Go educate yourself. Seriously.

Show me your 958 and I will take back everything I have said.
 
Show me your 958 and I will take back everything I have said.

Is it me or do we have a new wave of newbies talking out of their arse?

If you have FRT information, post it or keep quiet. With your argument, almost any new firearm is prohibited. Pretty difficult to be classified as "Prohibited" when it hasn't been classified yet. Again, if you are an insider of some sort, post the proof - as starting a false scare on this classification subject has led to infractions.

I see some pink in your future.
 
Unavailable for sale does not equal legally prohibited. As for showing someone shooting a NR 958... Go look at tvpp's video.

Go troll somewhere else before you turn pink.

I did no say anything about legally prohibited, I just said prohibited, and the are.
 
Is it me or do we have a new wave of newbies talking out of their arse?

If you have FRT information, post it or keep quiet. With your argument, almost any new firearm is prohibited. Pretty difficult to be classified as "Prohibited" when it hasn't been classified yet. Again, if you are an insider of some sort, post the proof - as starting a false scare on this classification subject has led to infractions.

I see some pink in your future.

There is and never will be any FRT information. The rcmp don't want to go down that road, they have no need to go there when they already have what they want.
 
There is and never will be any FRT information. The rcmp don't want to go down that road, they have no need to go there when they already have what they want.

So the RCMP will never classify a firearm again, is what you are saying? Start posting proof of your position, as your 'top of your head' generalizations and semantics are getting tiresome.

:popCorn:

Do you own any guns? Who did you vote for in the last federal election?
 
So the RCMP will never classify a firearm again, is what you are saying? Start posting proof of your position, as your 'top of your head' generalizations and semantics are getting tiresome.

:popCorn:

Do you own any guns? Who did you vote for in the last federal election?

What I'm saying is that the rcmp are not going to classify the type 81. They have what they want.

Open your eyes and face the reality.
 
What I'm saying is that the rcmp are not going to classify the type 81. They have what they want.

Open your eyes and face the reality.

ive been thinking the same thing about a few firearms at the lab but to say they are prohibited is straight up trolling.

PS what is it they already have?
 
Back
Top Bottom