KAC SR15 vs Noveske N4 etc

TRG-42

Regular
EE Expired
Rating - 100%
13   0   0
Since there has been a couple of SR15 threads I thought I would share some info regarding the SR15 upper

Barrel

First off, the SR15 and N4s have CHF barrels . The SR15 has a CHF by Colt Canada ( yay ! ) , the Noveske N4 has a CHF by FN

Noveske N4 claim to fame is the N4 is a M249 machine gun spec barrel and apparently the chrome lining is twice as thick so they say

Daniel Defense DDM4 ( newer ones ) and XVM have CHF ( they say they forge them in house )

Noveske Stainless - these are made from Pac Nor blanks, at Pac Nor by Noveske on their own tooling ( button ). These barrels are insanely accurate

Gas System

Since mid length is the in thing, Noveske N4 has "std" mid length, the KAC has their proprietary mid ( I think its gas tube from SR25 ) but as you can see its a bit longer. KAC is on top

SR15-10.jpg


Noveske has their "intermediate" on their stainless barrels 18" that is between mid length and rifle

E3 Bolt

Here is where the KAC is significantly different than all the others

Not going to go over the advantages...you can read that on KAC web site. Look at the pictures...you don't have to be a engineer to see the advantages
KAC on left...notice generous radius

bcg-6.jpg


Note extractor...not only the lobster tail ( like LMT enhanced ) but pivot point is different

bcg-16.jpg


Cam pin hole is smaller leaving more area around this weak point. Hard to tell on this pic but will be readily apparent on next one

bcg-21.jpg


Here is cam pin. Notice E3 is smaller in dia

bcg-22.jpg


In case anyone is wondering how the firing pin fits in the smaller hole of the cam pin

bcg-29.jpg


BTW a standard bolt will cycle in the E3 extension....I didn't fire a round since my wife would not appreciate a hole in our living room

Value

I would consider the KAC SR15 a great value. Once you factor in the $500+ URX II, and $400 worth of BUIS that comes with it , you get all the benefits of the barrel and E3 bolt for the same price as other uppers ! The reality is most people will eventually pimp out their std upper with some railed forearm and decent BUIS sooner or later. With the SR15 you just pay for it up front

I will add more comparison pics later
 
One thing I don't like about the URX II are the screws that tighten the halves together. They constantly walk out on me, even with locktight.

I do prefer the profile and weight of the URX II over Noveske's SWS rail. The KAC is much lighter up front with the slimmer barrel profile and the URX II though.

Plus the many more differences of the KAC lower.

4369392084_87f7660cd7_b.jpg
 
Last edited:
My experience is that the FN and Colt Canada barrel shot about the same in terms of accuracy. Both are capable of about 1MOA at 200m if you feed them with decent quality ball ammunition. Of course, pound by pound Noveske has a medium contour barrel so in more sustained firing it will hold its accuracy better.

The KAC E3 bolt is a very neat design. The dual spring extractor was used by FN2000 as well. It tries to address some of the common issues with the AR bolt design to prolong its service life.

In a way, the KAC is a proprietary AR, that you may call it an AR variant but not quite an AR.

The Noveske is basicly close to what a modern M16 should be without altering the basic components. Basicly it is an AR with a high quality med profile CHF barrel.
 
I played with my standard F/A LMT BCG vs my KAC E3 bolt last night. I noted the same differences.

The carrier seemed the same. Is it just the bolt/barrel extension that differ?

I would be nervous firing a standard bolt in an E3 barrel extension, even if it appears to lock up.

BTW you can get most of the KAC E3 benefits from the LMT enhanced bolt for standard ARs (minus the improved cam region of the KAC bolt)

l7q3b_5.56_enhanced_bolt_assy_thumb.jpg
 
And i was done Christmas shopping..........now this.....you guys....
Thanks for your post (just wonder do you get any points from my credit card?)
 
Back
Top Bottom