I picked up a No.5 Jungle Carbine sporter from an estate sale that's a prime candidate for restoration, just replace the missing parts.
I wanted to check the headspace but because I'm super cheap, I reverse engineered a gauge from a picture and printed my own.

Go - 0.064"
No-Go - 0.068"
Field - 0.074"
These are the British armourer's spec. I think SAAMI and CIP are a bit tighter.
My No.4 Maltby passes the Field gauge no problem but the No.5 just about closes all the way with a #0 bolt head. The #1 bolt head from the No.4 fairs a bit better in the No.5 but still not where it should be.
Some potential solutions I've heard and read are:
I'm going to restore it regardless but I'd prefer to be able to shoot the rifle.
If anyone wants the STL, let me know. Your printer has be fairly dialed in to hit the tolerance but you could always print it 1-2% bigger then sand down to spec.
I wanted to check the headspace but because I'm super cheap, I reverse engineered a gauge from a picture and printed my own.

Go - 0.064"
No-Go - 0.068"
Field - 0.074"
These are the British armourer's spec. I think SAAMI and CIP are a bit tighter.
My No.4 Maltby passes the Field gauge no problem but the No.5 just about closes all the way with a #0 bolt head. The #1 bolt head from the No.4 fairs a bit better in the No.5 but still not where it should be.
Some potential solutions I've heard and read are:
- Find a #2 or #3 bolt head (probably hens teeth now)
- I reload, so use cases that have thicker rims (PPU maybe?)
- An old timer told me he puts orings around the base of the case to tighten the headspace on each round (is that legitimate or safe?)
- ????
I'm going to restore it regardless but I'd prefer to be able to shoot the rifle.
If anyone wants the STL, let me know. Your printer has be fairly dialed in to hit the tolerance but you could always print it 1-2% bigger then sand down to spec.
Attachments
Last edited:




















































