![]()
![]()
Next to no bluing left.
Strange. 1954 are mostly in a very good condition.
![]()
![]()
Next to no bluing left.
Ahem.![]()
![]()
Next to no bluing left.
Ahem.
This is off topic.
Reason: exact opposite of ugly.
Nice!
Note the peep sight made from a Lee Enfield " L " sight. Cut a slot in the cover and brazed the sight in position. The lever and pin have been replaced with a 1/4" bolt. The receiver is threaded. This holds the cover tight.
![]()
Welded a side mount rail to it. YUP guns destroyed. Its a complete piece of bubba'd 2MOA junk now
![]()
![]()
I bought this a few years ago from a retailer who claims it came in a crate. I have never seen one like it. Honest wear , no refurb all numbers match. Looks like a mag reblue when it was Frankenpinned. I have not fired this rifle.
Ready? Custom fiberglass stock lol.
![]()
![]()
I bought this a few years ago from a retailer who claims it came in a crate. I have never seen one like it. Honest wear , no refurb all numbers match. Looks like a mag reblue when it was Frankenpinned. I have not fired this rifle.
![]()
I bought this a few years ago from a retailer who claims it came in a crate. I have never seen one like it. Honest wear , no refurb all numbers match. Looks like a mag reblue when it was Frankenpinned. I have not fired this rifle.
I might be wrong but it looks like fir to me from the look of the bark, larch bark is redder. Have both in the woodshed this year and they look different when you see them beside each other.
Larch/Tamarak has a thinner, flaky bark?
I might be wrong but it looks like fir to me from the look of the bark, larch bark is redder. Have both in the woodshed this year and they look different when you see them beside each other.